基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练方案构建及其效果

吕恬歌; 贾臻; 罗青青; 杜军; 杨超; 阳逸; 杨国愉

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401111

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练方案构建及其效果

医学心理学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练方案构建及其效果
- Construction of a group psychological training program for junior officers based on competency model and its effectiveness evaluation
- 陆军军医大学学报 2024年46卷第10期页码：1172-1179
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系军人发展心理学教研室
  2.110000 沈阳，北部战区总医院干部病房一科
- 作者简介：
  
  [杨国愉，E-mail: gyyang0122@foxmail.comYANG Guoyu, E-mail: gyyang0122@foxmail.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401111
  中图分类号： R395.1;R395.6;R821.2
- 收稿：2024-01-26，
  
  修回：2024-03-14，
  
  纸质出版：2024-05-30
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吕恬歌, 贾臻, 罗青青, 等. 基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练方案构建及其效果[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(10):1172-1179.

Tiange LYU, Zhen JIA, Qingqing LUO, et al. Construction of a group psychological training program for junior officers based on competency model and its effectiveness evaluation[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(10): 1172-1179.
吕恬歌, 贾臻, 罗青青, 等. 基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练方案构建及其效果[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(10):1172-1179. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401111.

Tiange LYU, Zhen JIA, Qingqing LUO, et al. Construction of a group psychological training program for junior officers based on competency model and its effectiveness evaluation[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(10): 1172-1179. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401111.

摘要

目的

构建基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练，并探究其对初级军官的胜任力与心理健康的干预效果。

方法

采用Delphi法，构建基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练方案。于2023年10-11月采用方便抽样方法对63名初级军官进行团体心理训练干预，根据随机对照试验设计原则，采用系统随机化法将研究对象分为试验组(

=30)和对照组(

=33)。试验组共参加8次团体心理训练，每周2次，每次团体心理训练时间为90~120 min，对照组不参加训练。分别在训练前、训练结束时使用胜任力测评表、12项一般健康问卷(GHQ-12)、工作绩效量表(Chinese perceived stress scale，CPSS)、大五人格量表(Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventory，NEO-FFI)对2组初级军官进行评估。

结果

① 2轮专家咨询结果显示，总回收率为100%，专家权威系数为0.87，2轮专家咨询肯德尔协调系数(ω)分别为0.102(

0.001)、0.410(

0.001)，变异系数均

0.3，专家咨询结果可靠。②干预后时间主效应结果显示，试验组胜任力总分(

0.001)、外向性得分(

0.05)、责任心得分(

0.01)均显著高于对照组；试验组GHQ-12总分显著低于对照组(

0.001)。③干预后组别主效应结果显示，试验组外向性得分显著高于对照组(

0.01)。④干预后时间×组间的交互作用结果显示，试验组胜任力总分(

0.01)、工作绩效得分(

0.05)、外向性得分(

0.05)、宜人性得分(

0.001)和责任心得分(

0.01)均显著高于对照组；试验组GHQ-12总分显著低于对照组(

0.01)。

结论

基于胜任力模型的初级军官团体心理训练能够显著提升初级军官的胜任力，强化人格特质中的外向性、宜人性和责任心，提升工作绩效。

Abstract

Objective

To construct a group psychological training for junior officers based on competency model and explore its intervention effect on competency and mental health of junior officers.

Methods

Delphi method was used to construct a group psychological training program for junior officers based on competency model. A total of 63 junior officers were subjected with convenience sampling during October and November 2023. According to the principle of randomized controlled experimental design

the participants were divided into experimental gro

up (

=30) and control group (

=33). The experimental group was given our group psychological training program for totally 8 sessions

90~120 min per session

2 sessions per week

while the control group received no such training. Competency scale

12-item general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)

Chinese perceived stress scale (CPSS)

and Neuroticism Extraversion Openness Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) were used to assess the 2 groups before and at the end of intervention.

Results

① The results of the 2 rounds of expert consultation showed that the total recovery rate was 100%

the expert authority coefficient was 0.87

the Kendall's coordination coefficients (ω) of the 2 rounds of expert consultation were 0.102 (

0.001) and 0.410 (

0.001)

respectively

with a coefficients of variation of

0.3

indicating reliable expert consultation. ② The results of post-intervention time main effect indicated that the total score of competence (

0.001)

extroversion score (

0.05) and responsibility score (

0.01) were significantly higher

but the total score of GHQ-12 was obviously lower in the experimental group than the control group (

0.001). ③ The results of post-intervention group main effects revealed that the extraversion score of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (

0.01). ④ The results of the post-intervention time × group interaction displayed that the experimental group had notably higher total competency score (

0.01)

job performance score (

0.05)

extraversion score (

0.05)

agreeableness score (

0.001) and responsibility score (

0.01)

but lower total GHQ-12 score (

0.01) than the control group.

Conclusion

Competency-based modeling group psychological training for junior officers can significantly enhance the competency

strengthen the extroversion

agreeableness and responsibility in personality traits

and thus improve job performance for them.

关键词

Keywords

references

李梅英. 青年军官心理压力的社会学分析[J]. 理论月刊, 2007(2): 108-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0544.2007.02.038.

LI M Y. Sociological analysis of psychological pressure of young officers[J]. Theory Mon, 2007(2): 108-110. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0544.2007.02.038.

刘敢新, 杜俊容. 国防生教育管理问题及对策研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 16(4): 149-152. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5831.2010.04.026.

LIU G X, DU J R. Analysis of the problem and countermeasure on education of national defense students[J]. J Chongqing Univ Soc Sci Ed, 2010, 16(4): 149-152. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5831.2010.04.026.

MCCLELLAND D C. Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence. "[J]. Am Psychol, 1973, 28(1): 1-14. DOI: 10.1037/h0034092.

ENNIS M R. Competency models: a review of the literature and the role of the employment and training administration (ETA)[M]. Washington: US Department of Labor, 2008: 5-10.

KOEPPEN K, HARTIĆ J, KLIEME E, et al . Current issues in competence modeling and assessment[J ] . Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/J Psychol, 2008, 216(2): 61-73. DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.61.

刘宏伟, 王广新. "12345" 市民热线承办人员胜任力模型构建[J]. 心理技术与应用, 2023, 11(4): 222-233. DOI: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2023.04.004.

LIU H W, WANG G X. The construction of competency model of "12345" civil hotline functionaries[J]. Psychol Tech Appl, 2023, 11(4): 222-233. DOI: 10.16842/j.cnki.issn2095-5588.2023.04.004.

WILLⅡAMS R S. Performance Management[M]. London: International Thomson Business Press, 1998: 17-18.

林起雄. 武警部队内卫总队政治指导员胜任力模型研究: 以武警龙岩支队为例[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2013.

LIN Q X. Study on competency model of political instructor of armed police internal security corps——Taking Longyan detachment of armed police force as an example[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2013.

陈树利. 基于DEMATEL方法的预备役军官选拔评价及对策研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2017.

CHEN S L. DEMATEL-based evaluation method of reserve officers' selection and suggestions[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2017.

王芙蓉, 陈林, 易盼. 基于初级指挥军官任职需求的军校技术类学员胜任力模型研究[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2015, 23(3): 393-396. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.03.003.

WANG F R, CHEN L, YI P. The competency model of technical cadets based on the position needs for junior commanding officer[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2015, 23(3): 393-396. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2015.03.003.

董振宝. 基于军官职业化的军官岗位任职资格标准研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2018.

DONG Z B. Research on the qualification standard of officer post based on officer professionalization[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2018.

苗丹民, 罗正学, 王京生, 等. 初级军官胜任特征心理品质评价模型建立[J]. 第四军医大学学报, 2004, 25(8): 755-758.

MIAO D M, LUO Z X, WANG J S, et al . Establishment of rating model of psychological qualities in coherence of competency for low-ranking commanders[J ] . J Fourth Mil Med Univ, 2004, 25(8): 755-758.

王兴, 李钦, 周青, 等. 基于德尔菲法HIV/AIDS中医证候专家问卷分析[J]. 医学信息, 2021, 34(2): 73-77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.02.020.

WANG X, LI Q, ZHOU Q, et al . An expert questionnaire HIV/AIDS TCM syndrome based on Delphi method[J ] . J Med Inf, 2021, 34(2): 73-77. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1959.2021.02.020.

KANG H. Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Powersoftware[J]. J Educ Eval Health Prof, 2021, 18: 17. DOI: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17.

GOLDBERG D. Use of the general health questionnaire in clinical work[J]. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed), 1986, 293(6556): 1188-1189. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6556.1188.

赵文璐. 员工满意度、组织承诺与员工工作绩效关系研究[D]. 北京: 清华大学, 2012.

ZHAO W L. A study on the relationship between employee satisfaction and organizational commitment with job performance[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2012.

COSTA P T, MCCRAE R R. Neo Personality Inventory[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000: 407-409.

梁宇, 李诺恩. 国际中文教材评价指标体系构建: 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法[J]. 贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2023(6): 30-40. DOI: 10.16614/j.gznuj.skb.2023.06.004.

LIANG Y, LI N E. Construction of evaluation indicator system for CSL textbooks: based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process[J]. J Guizhou Norm Univ Soc Sci, 2023(6): 30-40. DOI: 10.16614/j.gznuj.skb.2023.06.004.

邱春冬, 马思雨, 孟亚兵, 等. 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建医院内部配置大型医疗设备评价指标的研究[J]. 江苏卫生事业管理, 2023, 34(1): 110-115.

QIU C D, MA S Y, MENG Y B, et al . Research on constructing internal evaluation index of large medical equipment in hospital based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process[J ] . Jia ngsu Health Syst Manag, 2023, 34(1): 110-115.

高小彤, 张成欢. 基于三维结构医疗机构主导的"互联网+护理服务" 质量评价体系的构建[J]. 江苏卫生事业管理, 2023, 34(10): 1383-1388.

GAO X T, ZHANG C H. Construction of a medical institution-led quality evaluation system for"Internet+Nursing service" Based on a three-dimensional structure[J]. Jiangsu Health Syst Manag, 2023, 34(10): 1383-1388.

CHOPIK W J, NEWTON N J, RYAN L H, et al . Gratitude across the life span: age differences and links to subjective well-being[J ] . J Posit Psychol, 2019, 14(3): 292-302. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2017.1414296.

MCRAE K, GROSS J J. Emotion regulation[J]. Emotion, 2020, 20(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000703.

王婷婷. 大五人格对大学生网络强迫性购买的影响及干预: 沉浸体验的中介作用[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2021.

WANG T T. The influence and intervention of big five personality on college students' online compulsive purchase——the mediating role of immersion experience[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2021.

DEVIH M, PURBORINI N, CHANG H J. Mediating effect of resilience on association among stress, depression, and anxiety in Indonesian nursing students[J]. J Prof Nurs, 2021, 37(4): 706-713. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.04.004.

崔红, 王登峰. 中国人的人格与心理健康[J]. 心理科学进展, 2007, 15(2): 234-240. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2007.02.008.

CUI H, WANG D F. Chinese personality and mental health[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2007, 15(2): 234-240. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2007.02.008.

王征, 徐凯赟. 企业社会工作介入员工职业倦怠干预: 基于工作绩效的分析[J]. 岭南师范学院学报, 2022, 43(5): 66-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4702.2022.05.008.

WANG Z, XU K Y. The intervention of professional social work in employees' job burnout: based on analyses of work performance[J]. J Lingnan Norm Univ, 2022, 43(5): 66-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-4702.2022.05.008.

崔国东, 程延园, 赵锴, 等. 工作使命感与抑制性建言: 工作心理所有权和权力距离的作用[J]. 经济与管理研究, 2022, 43(7): 132-144. DOI: 10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2022.07.008.

CUI G D, CHENG Y Y, ZHAO K, et al . Linking calling with employee's prohibitive voice: roles of job-based psychological ownership and power distance[J ] . Res Econ Manag, 2022, 43(7): 132-144. DOI: 10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2022.07.008.

ELANGOVAN A R, PINDER C C, MCLEAN M. Callings and organizational behavior[J]. J Vocat Behav, 2010, 76(3): 428-440. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2009.10.009.

杨国愉. 军人团体心理训练[M]. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社, 2016: 171.

YANG G Y. Group psychological training for military personnel[M]. Chongqing: Southwest Normal University Press, 2016: 171.

浏览量

349

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

初级军官胜任力与工作绩效的关系：人格和心理弹性的中介作用

基于幸福素养理论的军校学员团体心理训练的干预研究

陆军军士发展性团体训练方案构建及应用

我国团体心理训练研究进展与趋势(2003-2022年)——基于CiteSpace和VOSviewer的可视化分析

患者安全胜任力护理人员自评量表的编制及信效度评价