口罩遮挡条件下面部情绪识别对医学生亲社会行为的影响：状态共情的中介作用

张振铭; 郑莹灿; 唐映丹; 谭鑫杰; 王菲菲; 王佳; 朱梦音; 薛奕童; 杨国愉

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401093

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

口罩遮挡条件下面部情绪识别对医学生亲社会行为的影响：状态共情的中介作用

医学心理学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 口罩遮挡条件下面部情绪识别对医学生亲社会行为的影响：状态共情的中介作用
- Effects of facial emotion recognition on prosocial behavior of medical students in mask-obscured scenes: mediating effect of state empathy
- 陆军军医大学学报 2024年46卷第13期页码：1585-1592
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学医学心理系军人发展心理学教研室
  2.671000 云南大理，陆军第七十五集团军医院精神心理科
- 作者简介：
  
  [ 杨国愉，E-mail: 876274215@qq.com YANG Guoyu, E-mail: 876274215@qq.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401093
  中图分类号： R192;R395.1
- 收稿：2024-01-26，
  
  修回：2024-04-25，
  
  纸质出版：2024-07-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张振铭, 郑莹灿, 唐映丹, 等. 口罩遮挡条件下面部情绪识别对医学生亲社会行为的影响：状态共情的中介作用[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(13):1585-1592.

Zhenming ZHANG, Yingcan ZHENG, Yingdan TANG, et al. Effects of facial emotion recognition on prosocial behavior of medical students in mask-obscured scenes: mediating effect of state empathy[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(13): 1585-1592.
张振铭, 郑莹灿, 唐映丹, 等. 口罩遮挡条件下面部情绪识别对医学生亲社会行为的影响：状态共情的中介作用[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(13):1585-1592. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401093.

Zhenming ZHANG, Yingcan ZHENG, Yingdan TANG, et al. Effects of facial emotion recognition on prosocial behavior of medical students in mask-obscured scenes: mediating effect of state empathy[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(13): 1585-1592. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202401093.

摘要

目的

探讨状态共情在口罩遮挡条件下面部情绪识别对医学生亲社会行为影响的中介作用。

方法

于2023年7-9月招募53名来自重庆某医学高校的医学生，完成面部情绪识别任务、独裁者博弈任务、状态共情测试，采用Spearman相关分析考察口罩遮挡与否、状态共情、特质共情、亲社会行为之间的相关性，采用PROCESS程序检验状态共情的中介以及口罩遮挡与否的调节作用。

结果

① 口罩遮挡与否、状态共情与亲社会行为显著相关(

0.01)；②状态共情在面部情绪识别与亲社会行为之间起中介作用，其中悲伤的相对中介效应的效果量最大(47%)；③面部情绪识别、口罩遮挡与否的交互项对状态共情的影响显著(

0.05)。

结论

面部情绪识别可以直接影响亲社会行为，也可以通过状态共情间接影响亲社会行为。相比于无口罩遮挡条件，口罩遮挡会显著增强快乐、悲伤、中性情绪对状态共情的促进作用。

Abstract

Objective

To explore the mediating effect of facial emotion recognition on prosocial behavior of medical students in mask-obscured scenes.

Methods

Fifty-three medical students from a medical university in Chongqing were enrolled from July to September 2023 to complete the facial emotion recognition task

the dictator gaming task and the state empathy test. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the correlation between mask wearing and state empathy

trait empathy and prosocial behaviours

and the PROCESS procedure was used to test the mediation of state empathy and the moderating effect of mask wearing or not.

Results

① mask wearing

state empathy and prosocial behaviour were significantly correlated (

0.01); ②State empathy exerted mediated effect between facial emotion recognition and prosocial behavior

with the largest effect size (47%) for the relative mediating effect of sadness; ③The interaction terms of facial emotion recognition and mask wearing had a significant effect on state empathy (

0.05).

Conclusion

Facial emotion recognition can influence prosocial behavior directly and also exert indirect effect on prosocial behavior through state empathy. Compared to the condition without mask wearing

mask wearing can significantly facilitate the effect of happy

sad and neutral emotions on state empathy.

关键词

Keywords

references

XU H, GONZALEZ MENDEZ M J, GUO L, et al . Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes relating to the COVID-19 pandemic among different populations in central China: cross-sectional survey[J ] . J Med Internet Res, 2020, 22(10): e22628. DOI: 10.2196/22628.

林海荣, 柏欣, 张俊辉, 等. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情前后某高校大学生其他法定传染病流行态势分析[J]. 疾病预防控制通报, 2023, 38(2): 18-21, 57. DOI: 10.13215/j.cnki.jbyfkztb.2212022.

LIN H R, BAI X, ZHANG J H, et al . Analysis of epidemic trend of other legal infectious diseases among college students before and after COVID-19 outbreak[J ] . Bull Dis Contr Prev China, 2023, 38(2): 18-21, 57. DOI: 10.13215/j.cnki.jbyfkztb.2212022.

TIMPKA T, NYCE J M. Face mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic-the significance of culture and the symbolic meaning of behavior[J]. Ann Epidemiol, 2021, 59: 1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.03.012.

CARBON C C. Wearing face masks strongly confuses counterparts in reading emotions[J]. Front Psychol, 2020, 11: 566886. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566886.

RUBA A L, POLLAK S D. Children's emotion inferences from masked faces: implications for social interactions during COVID-19[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(12): e0243708. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243708.

HAXBY J V, HOFFMAN E A, GOBBINI M I. Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2002, 51(1): 59-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01330-0.

DUNFIELD K A. A construct divided: prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes[J]. Front Psychol, 2014, 5: 958. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00958.

王玲. 具身情绪视角下大学生面部情绪识别对亲社会行为的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳师范大学, 2018.

WANG L. The influence of college students' facial emotion recognition on prosocial behavior based on embodied emotion theory[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Normal University, 2018.

MARSH A A, KOZAK M N, AMBADY N. Accurate identification of fear facial expressions predicts prosocial behavior[J]. Emotion, 2007, 7(2): 239-251. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.239.

刘宏艳, 葛列众. 面部表情识别对社会交往能力的影响作用[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(3): 413-417. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.03.054.

LIU H Y, GE L Z. Effects of facial expression recognition on social competence[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2014, 22(3): 413-417. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.03.054.

魏玉桂, 李幼穗. 不同移情训练法对儿童分享行为影响的实验研究[J]. 心理科学, 2001, 24(5): 557-562, 638. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2001.05.012.

WEI Y G, LI Y S. The experimental research on the ineluence of different empathy training methods to children's sharing behavior[J]. Psychol Sci, 2001, 24(5): 557-562, 638. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2001.05.012.

SILKE C,BRADY B, BOYLAN C, et al . Factors influencing the development of empathy and pro-social behaviour among adolescents: a systematic review[J ] . Child Youth Serv Rev, 2018, 94: 421-436. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.07.027.

WEIB M, HEIN G, HEWIG J. Between joy and sympathy: smiling and sad recipient faces increase prosocial behavior in the dictator game[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(11): 6172. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18116172.

BIERMANN M, SCHULZE A, UNTERSEHER F, et al . Trust worthiness appraisals of faces wearing a surgical mask during the Covid-19 pandemic in Germany: an experimental study[J ] . PLoS One, 2021, 16(5): e0251393. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251393.

GRUNDMANN F, EPSTUDE K, SCHEIBE S. Face masks reduce emotion-recognition accuracy and perceived closeness[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(4): e0249792. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249792.

FATFOUTA R, TROPE Y. Keeping one's distance: mask wearing is implicitly associated with psychological distance[J]. Soc Psychol Pers Sci, 2022, 13(4): 875-883. DOI: 10.1177/19485506211044061.

李继波, 黄希庭. 时间定价对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2014, 37(4): 925-929. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2014.04.035.

LI J B, HUANG X T. The effects of accounting for time on prosocial behaviors[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2014, 37(4): 925-929. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.2014.04.035.

KRATZKE I M, ROSENBAUM M E, COX C, et al . Effect of clear vs standard covered masks on communication with patients during surgical clinic encounters: a randomized clinical trial[J ] . JAMA Surg, 2021, 156(4): 372-378. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0836.

WONG C K, YIP B H, MERCER S, et al . Effect of facemasks on empathy and relational continuity: a randomised controlled trial in primary care[J ] . BMC Fam Pract, 2013, 14: 200. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-200.

PAVLOVA M A, SOKOLOV A A. Reading covered faces[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2022, 32(2): 249-265. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhab311.

FERRARI C, VECCHI T, SCIAMANNA G, et al . Facemasks and face recognition: potential impact on synaptic plasticity[J ] . Neurobiol Dis, 2021, 153: 105319. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105319.

LU J G, SONG L L, ZHENG Y H, et al . Masks as a moral symbol: masks reduce wearers' deviant behavior in China during COVID-19[J ] . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2022, 119(41): e2211144119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2211144119.

MARTINELLI L, KOPILAŠ V, VIDMAR M, et al . Face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic: a simple protection tool with many meanings[J ] . Front Public Health, 2020, 8: 606635. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.606635.

PERACH R, LIMBU M. Can culture beat Covid-19? Evidence that exposure to facemasks with cultural symbols increases solidarity[J]. Br J Soc Psychol, 2022, 61(3): 991-1010. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12521.

DROSSMAN D A, CHANG L, DEUTSCH J K, et al . A review of the evidence and recommendations on communication skills and the patient-provider relationship: a Rome foundation working team report[J ] . Gastroenterology, 2021, 161(5): 1670-1688.e7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.037.

YANG T, YANG Z Y, XU G Z, et al . Tsinghua facial expression database—A database of facial expressions in Chinese young and older women and men: development and validation[J ] . PLoS One, 2020, 15(4): e0231304. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231304.

GUTH W, SCHMITTBERGER R, SCHWARZE B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining[J]. J Econ Behav Organ, 1982, 3(4): 367-388. DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

BATSON C D, BATSON J G, TODD R M, et al . Empathy and the collective good: caring for one of the others in a social dilemma[J ] . J Pers Soc Psychol, 1995, 68(4): 619-631. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.4.619.

温忠麟, 叶宝娟. 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补?[J]. 心理学报, 2014, 46(5): 714-726. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714.

WEN Z L, YE B J. Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: competitors or backups?[J]. Acta Psychol Sin, 2014, 46(5): 714-726. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00714.

方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强. 类别变量的中介效应分析[J]. 心理科学, 2017, 40(2): 471-477. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20170233.

FANG J, WEN Z L, ZHANG M Q. Mediation analysis of categorical variables[J]. J Psychol Sci, 2017, 40(2): 471-477. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20170233.

方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量: 回顾与展望[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(1): 105-111. DOI: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2012.01.015.

FANG J, ZHANG M Q, QIU H Z. Mediation analysis and effect size measurement: retrospect and prospect[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2012, 28(1): 105-111. DOI: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2012.01.015.

方杰, 温忠麟, 何子杰. 常见的类别变量的有调节的中介模型分析[J]. 应用心理学, 2023, 29(4): 291-299. DOI: 10.20058/j.cnki.cjap.022150.

FANG J, WEN Z L, HE Z J. Moderated mediation analyses of a frequently-used types of categorical variable[J]. Chin J Appl Psychol, 2023, 29(4): 291-299. DOI: 10.20058/j.cnki.cjap.022150.

SHARIFF A F, TRACY J L. What are emotion expressions for?[J]. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2011, 20(6): 395-399. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411424739.

REED L I, ZEGLEN K N, SCHMIDT K L. Facial expressions as honest signals of cooperative intent in a one-shot anonymous Prisoner's Dilemma game[J]. Evol Hum Behav, 2012, 33(3): 200-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.09.003.

VAN DOORN E A, VAN KLEEF G A, VAN DER PLIGT J. How emotional expressions shape prosocial behavior: interpersonal effects of anger and disappointment on compliance with requests[J]. Motiv Emot, 2015, 39(1): 128-141. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-014-9421-6.

VAN KLEEF G A. How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model[J]. Curr Direct Psychol Sci, 2009, 18(3): 184-188. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x.

陈璟, 汪为. 情绪即社会信息模型述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 214-223. DOI: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.02.014.

CHEN J, WANG W. A review of the emotion As social information model[J]. Psychol Dev Educ, 2013, 29(2): 214-223. DOI: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2013.02.014.

VAN KLEEF G A, HOMAN A C, BEERSMA B, et al . Searing sentiment or cold calculation? The effects of leader emotional displays on team performance depend on follower epistemic motivation[J ] . IEEE Eng Manag Rev, 2012, 40(1): 73-94. DOI: 10.1109/emr.2012.6172771.

MAIBOM H L. The many faces of empathy and their relation to prosocial action and aggression inhibition[J]. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci, 2012, 3(2): 253-263. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1165.

CHENG K K, LAM T H, LEUNG C C. Wearing face masks in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: altruism and solidarity[J]. Lancet, 2022, 399(10336): e39-e40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30918-1.

TSANG P M, PROST A. Boundaries of solidarity: a meta-ethnography of mask use during past epidemics to inform SARS-CoV-2 suppression[J]. BMJ Glob Health, 2021, 6(1): e004068. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004068.

PERACH R, LIMBU M. Can culture beat Covid-19? Evidence that exposure to facemasks with cultural symbols increases solidarity[J]. Br J Soc Psychol, 2022, 61(3): 991-1010. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12521.

OLIVERA-LA ROSA A, CHUQUICHAMBI E G, INGRAM G P D. Keep your (social) distance: Pathogen concerns and social perception in the time of COVID-19[J]. Pers Individ Dif, 2020, 166: 110200. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110200.

SESSA P, MECONI F. Perceived trustworthiness shapes neural empathic responses toward others' pain[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2015, 79(Pt A): 97-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.028.

AKSAN N, KISAC B, AYDIN M, et al . Symbolic interaction theory[J ] . Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 2009, 1(1): 902-904. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.160.

OLDMEADOW J A, KOCH C. Effects of face masks on person perception[J]. Perception, 2021, 50(10): 876-889. DOI: 10.1177/03010066211045172.

KAMATANI M, ITO M, MIYAZAKI Y, et al . Effects of masks worn to protect against COVID-19 on the perception of facial attractiveness[J ] . i-Perception, 2021, 12(3): 20416695211027920. DOI: 10.1177/20416695211027920.

浏览量

152

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据