军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应及外显测量研究

柳雪荣; 詹雨; 李威; 张李斌; 赵梦雪; 高鑫艳; 陈志毅; 冯正直

doi:10.16016/j.2097-0927.202309124

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应及外显测量研究

军事心理学 | 更新时间：2026-01-09

- 军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应及外显测量研究
- Implicit and explicit measures of loyalty assessment among military cadets
- 陆军军医大学学报 2024年46卷第3期页码：203-208
- 作者机构：
  
  1.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系医学心理实验研究中心
  2.100088 北京，北京师范大学心理学部
  3.400038 重庆，陆军军医大学(第三军医大学)医学心理系军事心理学教研室
  4.400715 重庆，西南大学心理学部
- 作者简介：
  
  [陈志毅，E-mail: chenzhiyi@tmmu.edu.cn CHEN Zhiyi, E-mail: chenzhiyi@tmmu.edu.cn
  [冯正直，E-mail: fzz@tmmu.edu.cn FENG Zhengzhi, E-mail: fzz@tmmu.edu.cn
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(32300907);作者贡献声明柳雪荣与詹雨负责研究思路整理、实验设计与实施、数据分析、文章的写作及手稿修改等工作；冯正直与陈志毅主要负责文章整体规划并提供课题资助；张李斌负责实验设计；高鑫艳与李威协助实验过程；李威与赵梦雪进行了手稿的最终修改与参考文献的检查
- DOI：10.16016/j.2097-0927.202309124
  中图分类号： G645.5;R395.6;R821.2
- 收稿：2023-09-21，
  
  修回：2023-12-15，
  
  纸质出版：2024-02-15
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
柳雪荣, 詹雨, 李威, 等. 军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应及外显测量研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(3):203-208.

Xuerong LIU, Yu ZHAN, Wei LI, et al. Implicit and explicit measures of loyalty assessment among military cadets[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(3): 203-208.
柳雪荣, 詹雨, 李威, 等. 军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应及外显测量研究[J]. 陆军军医大学学报, 2024,46(3):203-208. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202309124.

Xuerong LIU, Yu ZHAN, Wei LI, et al. Implicit and explicit measures of loyalty assessment among military cadets[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2024, 46(3): 203-208. DOI： 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202309124.

摘要

目的

探索军校学员内隐忠诚与外显忠诚的相关关系及其特异性，为更加全面、客观地评估个体忠诚提供理论依据和客观指标。

方法

使用E-Prime2.0参照经典内隐联想范式编制内隐联想-忠诚测验对64名军校学员进行内隐忠诚测验，同时使用《中国军人忠诚量表》进行外显忠诚测量。

结果

① 军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应显著，即均倾向于认为自我的忠诚高，非自我的忠诚低。②外显忠诚测评发现：军校学员被试对党、国家和人民的忠诚得分最高(4.79±0.34)，对职业的忠诚次之(4.38± 0.53)，对单位及领导的忠诚相对较低(4.03±0.83)。在忠诚的3个维度上，规范忠诚水平最高，继续忠诚得分较低。③军人内隐忠诚与外显测量结果显示：对党、国家和人民的忠诚(

=-0.030，

=0.823)、对职业的忠诚(

=-0.047，

=0.728)、

对单位的忠诚(

=0.050，

=0.710)、对领导的忠诚(

=0.043，

=0.749)相关均不显著。

结论

军校学员忠诚评价的内隐效应显著，且外显测量的忠诚与内隐忠诚之间无显著相关，不能够通过单一的外显测量去判断他们的忠诚态度。

Abstract

Objective

To explore the relevant relationship and specificity between the implicit and explicit loyalty of military cadets in order to provide a theoretical basis and objective indicators for a more comprehensive and objective assessment for individual loyalty.

Methods

E-Prime 2.0

a classic implicit association paradigm was employed to construct an implicit association loyalty test for 64 military cadets. Simultaneously

an explicit loyalty measurement was conducted using the Chinese Military Personnel Loyalty Scale.

Results

① Significant implicit effect was observed in the loyalty assessment of military cadets

indicating a general tendency to perceive higher levels of personal loyalty and lower levels of loyalty to external entities. ② Explicit loyalty assessment revealed that the participants had the highest loyalty score towards the Party

the Nation

and the People (4.79±0.34)

followed by the loyalty score to their profession (4.38±0.53)

and the relatively lower loyalty score towards the unit and leaders (4.03±0.83). Among the 3 dimensions of loyalty

the normative loyalty score ranked highest

while continuance loyalty score took lower. ③ There were no correlations among the scores of loyalty to the Party

the Nation

and the People (

=-0.030

=0.823)

to the profession (

=-0.047

=0.728)

to the unit (

=0.050

=0.710)

or to the leaders (

=0.043

=0.749).

Conclusion

The implicit effect in the loyalty assessment is significant in military cadets

and there is no significant correlation between explicit and implicit loyalty measurements. Thus

we cannot rely solely on explicit measurements to assess their loyalty attitudes.

关键词

Keywords

references

高景柱. 论爱国主义的忠诚之维[J]. 思想理论教育, 2021(12): 47-54. DOI: 10.16075/j.cnki.cn31-1220/g4.2021.12.007.

GAO J Z. The dimensions of patriotism loyalty[J]. Thought Theor Educ, 2021(12): 47-54. DOI: 10.16075/j.cnki.cn31-1220/g4.2021.12.007.

王芙蓉, 杨芳. 军人忠诚度研究进展[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(1): 186-190. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.01.041.

WANG F R, YANG F. Review on the research progress of soldiers loyalty[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2014, 22(1): 186-190. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.01.041.

SUKENDAR A, USMAN H, JABAR C S A. Teaching-loving-caring (asah-asih-asuh) and semi-military education on character education management[J]. J Cakrawala Pendidikan, 2019, 38(2): 292-304. DOI: 10.21831/cp.v38i2.24452.

GAL R. Commitment and obedience in the military: an Israeli case study[J]. Armed Forces Soc, 1985, 11(4): 553-564. DOI: 10.1177/0095327x8501100405.

宋乃平, 许维娣. 充分发挥政治工作对部队战斗力生成的重要作用[J]. 政工学刊, 2019(7): 35. DOI: 10.16296/j.cnki.zgxk1979.2019.07.017.

SONG N P, XU W D. Give full play to the important role of political work in the formation of combat effectiveness of troops[J]. Polit Work J, 2019(7): 35. DOI: 10.16296/j.cnki.zgxk1979.2019.07.017.

NYE C, WHITE L, HORGEN K, et al . Predictors of attitudes and performance in U.S. Army recruiters: does personality matter?[J ] . Mil Psychol, 2020, 32(1): 81-90. DOI: 10.1080/08995605.2019.1652486.

NICHOLS R, NOURY L. Assessing baseline proficiency of national guard combat medics due for recertification: a pilot study[J]. Mil Med, 2023, 188(1/2): e37-e41. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usab525.

UNGRADY G, DABKOWSKI M. Exploring the causal relationship between factors affecting US army recruitment[J]. Ind Syst Eng Rev, 2022, 9(2): 83-90. DOI: 10.37266/iser.2021v9i2.pp83-90.

HENDERSON W. Cohesion, the human element in combat: leadership and societal influence inthe armies of the Soviet Union, the United States, North Vietnam, and Israel[M]. Washington DC: National Defense University Press, 1985.

ZACCARO S J. The effects of cohesion source on process loss in group performance[D]. Storrs: University of Connecticut, 1982.

MULLEN B, COPPER C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: an integration[J]. Psychol Bull, 1994, 115(2): 210-227. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210.

王芙蓉, 陈罡, 雷潇. 中国军人忠诚量表的初步编制[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(6): 1119-1122. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.06.015.

WANG F R, CHEN G, LEI X. Development of the loyalty scale for Chinese servicemen[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2018, 26(6): 1119-1122. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.06.015.

陈罡, 王芙蓉, 雷潇. 中国军人忠诚度的特点及影响因素[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2018, 26(1): 162-169. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.036.

CHEN G, WANG F R, LEI X. The characteristics and influencing factors of Chinese army's loyalty[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2018, 26(1): 162-169. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2018.01.036.

ANDERSON B, MEYER J, GOLDENBERG I, et al . Development and evolution of commitment profiles among military recruits: implications for turnover intention and well-being[J ] . Mil Psychol, 2022, 34(5): 570-590.

FARAMARZI A, BHATTACHARYA A. The economic worth of loyalty programs: an event study analysis[J]. J Bus Res, 2021, 123: 313-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.044.

蔡华俭. Greenwald提出的内隐联想测验介绍[J]. 心理科学进展, 2003, 11(3): 339-344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2003.03.017.

CAI H J. A review on implicit association test[J]. Adv Psychol Sci, 2003, 11(3): 339-344. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2003.03.017.

YAN M, LI H, SU Y Q, et al . The perceptual span and individual differences among Chinese children[J ] . Sci Stud Read, 2020, 24(6): 520-530. DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2020.1713789.

冯柔佳, 毕研玲, 付小丽, 等. 伪装情绪的人际影响及其作用机制[J]. 心理科学进展, 2020, 28(10): 1762-1776. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01762.

FENG R J, BI Y L, FU X L, et al . The interpersonal effects of fake emotion and the way it works[J ] . Adv Psychol Sci, 2020, 28(10): 1762-1776. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2020.01762.

RABBITT S M, RODRIGUEZ C M. Assessing parental attributions through an implicit measure: development and evaluation of the noncompliance IAT[J]. J Child Fam Stud, 2019, 28(4): 894-905. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-018-01315-2.

蔡华俭. 内隐自尊效应及内隐自尊与外显自尊的关系[J]. 心理学报, 2003, 35(6): 796-801.

CAI H J. The effect of implicit self-esteem and the relationship of explicit self-esteem and implicit self-esteem[J]. Acta Psychol Sin, 2003, 35(6): 796-801.

GREENWALD A G, NOSEK B A, BANAJI M R. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2003, 85(2): 197-216. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.

LEE K, CARSWELL J J, ALLEN N J. A meta-analytic review of occupational commitment: relations with person- and work-related variables[J]. J Appl Psychol, 2000, 85(5): 799-811. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.799.

王芙蓉. 初级军官职业承诺特点及影响因素[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2013, 21(4): 662-665. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.04.006.

WANG F R. Investigations on career commitment of junior military officers and its influential elements[J]. Chin J Clin Psychol, 2013, 21(4): 662-665. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2013.04.006.

韩文琴, 张雨青. 军人忠诚度与性格优势和心理韧性的关系[J]. 解放军医学杂志, 2019, 44(8): 695-700. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2019.08.12.

HAN W Q, ZHANG Y Q. The relationship between military loyalty and both character strengths and psychological resilience[J]. Med J Chin PLA, 2019, 44(8): 695-700. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2019.08.12.

王卓. 军人全面发展研究综述[J]. 青年与社会, 2019(23): 258-259.

WANG Z. A review of comprehensive development of soldiers[J]. Youth Soc, 2019(23): 258-259.

段彩彬, 周会, 许晓辉. 大学生的外显自尊和内隐自尊及自尊分离与就业焦虑的关系[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2019, 33(4): 301-306. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.04.012.

DUAN C B, ZHOU H, XU X H. Relationship among self-esteem, discrepancy of self-esteem and employment anxiety in college students[J]. Chin Ment Health J, 2019, 33(4): 301-306. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2019.04.012.

TISSERA H, LYDON J E. Seeing you, seeing me: links between perceived commitment, metaperceptions, and relationship well-being[J]. Pers Relatio, 2021, 28(3): 521-537. DOI: 10.1111/pere.12376.

柳施展. 新时期军队在我国社会利益结构的重要变化[J]. 才智, 2019(9): 227-228. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0208.2019.09.198.

LIU S Z. The important changes of the army's social interest structure in China in the new period[J]. Ability Wisdom, 2019(9): 227-228. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0208.2019.09.198.

SCHIMMACK U. The implicit association test: a method in search of a construct[J]. Perspect Psychol Sci, 2021, 16(2): 396-414. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619863798.

KURDI B, MANN T C, CHARLESWORTH T E S, et al . The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs[J ] . Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2019, 116(13): 5862-5871. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820240116.

CHARLESWORTH T E S, BANAJI M R. Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: I. long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016[J]. Psychol Sci, 2019, 30(2): 174-192. DOI: 10.1177/0956797618813087.

DENG W, ROSENBLATT A K, TALHELM T, et al . People from the U.S. and China think about their personal and collective future differently[J ] . Mem Cognit, 2023, 51(1): 87-100. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01344-9.

ZARUBA N, WESTPHAL A, GUTMANN F, et al . Preservice teachers' implicit and explicit attitudes towards teaching and learning[J ] . Front Educ, 2021, 6: 619098. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.619098.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于幸福素养理论的军校学员团体心理训练的干预研究

两种不同血流限制训练对军校学员上肢肌肉即时效应的影响