
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.南京医科大学附属宿迁第一人民医院麻醉与围术期医学科,江苏 宿迁 223800
2.南京医科大学第一附属医院麻醉科,江苏 南京 210000
潘熊熊,E-mail:panxx2024@126.com
收稿:2024-12-10,
纸质出版:2025-10-25
移动端阅览
徐幻浠,潘熊熊,马蓉等.布比卡因脂质体与罗哌卡因腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜全子宫切除术后的镇痛效果比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(10):892-895.
XU Huan-xi,PAN Xiong-xiong,MA Rong,et al.Comparative study on analgesic effect of bupivacaine liposome and ropivacaine on quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(10):892-895.
徐幻浠,潘熊熊,马蓉等.布比卡因脂质体与罗哌卡因腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜全子宫切除术后的镇痛效果比较[J].局解手术学杂志,2025,34(10):892-895. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.12E024053.
XU Huan-xi,PAN Xiong-xiong,MA Rong,et al.Comparative study on analgesic effect of bupivacaine liposome and ropivacaine on quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy[J].JOURNAL OF REGIONAL ANATOMY AND OPERATIVE SURGERY,2025,34(10):892-895. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.12E024053.
目的
2
明确布比卡因脂质体与罗哌卡因用于腹腔镜全子宫切除患者腰方肌阻滞效果的差异。
方法
2
选取2023年1月至2024年10月于南京医科大学附属宿迁第一人民医院行腹腔镜全子宫切除的70例患者为研究对象,将患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组35例。在全身麻醉前,对照组患者给予罗哌卡因腰方肌阻滞,观察组患者给予布比卡因脂质体腰方肌阻滞。对2组患者手术前后一般情况、术后不同时点视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、补救镇痛情况、术后不同时点简易智能状态检查量表(MMSE)评分、术后康复情况和镇痛不良反应进行比较。
结果
2
2组患者手术前后一般情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。在术后24 h、48 h和72 h,观察组患者腹部静息VAS评分均明显低于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。观察组患者静脉镇痛泵术后首次自控使用
时间明显晚于对照组(
P
<
0.05),术后48 h内镇痛泵按压次数和羟考酮补救镇痛率均明显少/低于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。在术后24 h、48 h和72 h,观察组患者MMSE评分均明显高于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。观察组患者术后下床活动时间和肛门恢复排气时间均显著早于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。2组患者的术后镇痛不良反应发生率无统计学差异(
P
>
0.05)。
结论
2
相对于使用罗哌卡因对腹腔镜全子宫切除患者进行腰方肌阻滞,布比卡因脂质体可以提供更长时间的镇痛作用,降低患者对静脉镇痛的依赖,有利于保护患者认知功能,可加快患者康复速度且不增加不良反应发生率。
Objective
2
To clarify the differences in the effects of bupivacaine liposome and ropivacaine on quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy.
Methods
2
A total of 70 patients who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy at Suqian First People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University from January 2023 to October 2024 were selected as the research subjects. The patients were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 35 cases in each group. Before general anesthesia,patients of the control group were given ropivacaine quadratus lumborum block, while patients of the observation group were given bupivacaine liposome quadratus lumborum block. The general conditions before and after operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at different time points after operation, rescue analgesia, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores at different time points after operation, postoperative rehabilitation and analgesic adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.
Results
2
There was no statistically significant difference in the general conditions of patients in the two groups before and after the operation (
P
>
0.05).At 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after surgery, the abdominal resting VAS scores of patients in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05).The time of the first self-controlled use of the
intravenous analgesic pump after surgery in the observation group was significantly later than that in the control group(
P
<
0.05).The number of analgesic pump compressions and the rate of oxycodone rescue analgesia in the observation group were significantly fewer/lower than those in the control group within 48 hours after surgery (
P
<
0.05).At 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after surgery, the MMSE scores of patients in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05).The time for patients to get out of bed and move around after surgery and the recovery time of anal exhaust in the observation group were significantly earlier than those in the control group (
P
<
0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative analgesic adverse reactions between the two groups of patients (
P
>
0.05).
Conclusion
2
Compared with the use of ropivacaine for quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy, bupivacaine liposome can provide a longer-lasting analgesic effect, reduce patients' dependence on intravenous analgesia, be conducive to protecting patients' cognitive function, accelerate the recovery of patients without increasing the incidence of adverse reactions.
Sailofsky S , Darin C , Alfahmy A , et al . Comparison of surgical outcomes after total laparoscopic hysterectomy or total vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri [J]. Obstet Gynecol , 2021 , 137 ( 3 ): 445 - 453 . doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004274 .
刘红燕 . 超声引导下弓状韧带上腰方肌阻滞与传统前路腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜子宫切除术后镇痛效果的影响 [J]. 反射疗法与康复医学 , 2024 , 5 ( 2 ): 95 - 97 . doi: 10.13664/j.cnki.2024.02.021 http://dx.doi.org/10.13664/j.cnki.2024.02.021 .
钟明强 , 王金英 , 纪凡层 , 等 . 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞对腹腔镜子宫切除术后镇痛效果的影响 [J]. 中国现代医生 , 2020 , 58 ( 32 ): 122 - 124 . doi: 10.13664/j.cnki.2020.11.031 http://dx.doi.org/10.13664/j.cnki.2020.11.031 .
张黄丽 , 殷昌生 , 贾晓姝 , 等 . 布比卡因脂质体术后镇痛应用进展 [J]. 武警医学 , 2023 , 34 ( 6 ): 530 - 534 . doi: 10.14010/j.cnki.wjyx. 2023.06.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.14010/j.cnki.wjyx.2023.06.011 .
李正阳 , 周路路 , 贾宁 , 等 . 布比卡因脂质体超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞用于胸腔镜手术患者的临床观察 [J]. 麻醉安全与质控 , 2024 , 6 ( 5 ): 270 - 274 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-2681.2024.05.007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-2681.2024.05.007 .
Clark IC , Allman RD , Rogers AL , et al . Multimodal pain management protocol to decrease opioid use and to improve pain control after thoracic surgery [J]. Ann Thorac Surg , 2022 , 114 ( 6 ): 2008 - 2014 . doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.059 .
Prabhakar A , Ward CT , Watson M , et al . Liposomal bupivacaine and novel local anesthetic formulations [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Aaesthesiol , 2019 , 33 ( 4 ): 425 - 432 . doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.012 .
陈洁 , 汪小海 , 葛卫红 . 局部麻醉药脂质缓释制剂的研究及临床分析 [J]. 药学与临床研究 , 2023 , 31 ( 1 ): 71 - 76 . doi: 10.13664/j.cnki.pcr.2023.01.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.13664/j.cnki.pcr.2023.01.011 .
段振馨 , 段光友 , 李洪 . 围术期神经认知障碍诊断方法、流程及注意事项的研究进展 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志 , 2019 , 35 ( 10 ): 1026 - 1029 . doi: 10.12089/jca.2019.10.022 http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2019.10.022 .
杜小强 , 吴俊雄 , 郭丽娜 , 等 . 超声引导腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在全腹式子宫切除术后的镇痛效果比较 [J]. 青岛大学学报(医学版) , 2024 , 60 ( 3 ): 417 - 421 . doi: 10.11712/jms.2096-5532. 2024.60.100 http://dx.doi.org/10.11712/jms.2096-5532.2024.60.100 .
周瑞芬 , 朱曼华 , 王玲志 . 罗哌卡因复合曲马多腰方肌阻滞对老年前列腺癌手术的应用效果 [J]. 中国临床药学杂志 , 2024 , 33 ( 3 ): 199 - 204 . doi: 10.19577/j.1007-4406.2024.03.006 http://dx.doi.org/10.19577/j.1007-4406.2024.03.006 .
蔡敏 , 尹泓 , 易明亮 , 等 . 超声引导下经弓状韧带上或前路腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜全子宫切除术中的比较 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志 , 2022 , 38 ( 3 ): 229 - 233 . doi: 10.12089/jca.2022.03.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.12089/jca.2022.03.001 .
杨越 , 朱琦 . 腰方肌阻滞联合喉罩全麻在老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉效果 [J]. 中国老年学杂志 , 2025 , 45 ( 1 ): 53 - 57 . doi: 10. 3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2025.01.015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2025.01.015 .
曾昭平 , 龙翔 , 谢晓燕 , 等 . 氢吗啡酮联合腰方肌阻滞在老年腹腔镜结肠癌根治术患者术后镇痛中的应用效果观察 [J]. 山东医药 , 2023 , 63 ( 22 ): 46 - 49 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2023.22.011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2023.22.011 .
陈军 , 张南南 , 张帆 , 等 . 布比卡因脂质体腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜妇科手术镇痛中的应用效果观察 [J]. 山东医药 , 2024 , 64 ( 29 ): 34 - 38 . doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2024.29.008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2024.29.008 .
仲明杰 , 刘勇 , 陈悦 , 等 . 竖脊肌平面阻滞对胸腔镜下老年肺癌根治术后谵妄及认知功能的影响 [J]. 局解手术学杂志 , 2024 , 33 ( 8 ): 718 - 721 . doi: 10.11659/jjssx.09E023007 http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.09E023007 .
朱曼华 , 应骐潞 , 王玲志 , 等 . 氟比洛芬联合腰方肌阻滞对老年患者全身麻醉肾切除术后神经认知功能及炎症反应的影响 [J]. 中国新药与临床杂志 , 2024 , 43 ( 6 ): 450 - 454 . doi: 10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2024.06.11 http://dx.doi.org/10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2024.06.11 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621