
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.江苏省人民医院宿迁医院急诊科,江苏 宿迁 223800
2.江苏省人民医院宿迁医院泌尿外科,江苏 宿迁 223800
汪东亮,E-mail:majinzhu2024@163.com
纸质出版日期:2025-02-25,
收稿日期:2023-12-19,
移动端阅览
马金柱, 高海燕, 王浩, 等. 不同消毒剂对超声引导颈内静脉穿刺和敷贴粘合的影响[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2025,34(2):147-149.
MA JIN-ZHU, GAO HAI-YAN, WANG HAO, et al. Influence of different disinfectants on ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture and adhesive application. [J]. Journal of regional anatomy and operative surgery, 2025, 34(2): 147-149.
马金柱, 高海燕, 王浩, 等. 不同消毒剂对超声引导颈内静脉穿刺和敷贴粘合的影响[J]. 局解手术学杂志, 2025,34(2):147-149. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.12E023079.
MA JIN-ZHU, GAO HAI-YAN, WANG HAO, et al. Influence of different disinfectants on ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture and adhesive application. [J]. Journal of regional anatomy and operative surgery, 2025, 34(2): 147-149. DOI: 10.11659/jjssx.12E023079.
目的
2
明确不同消毒剂对超声引导颈内静脉穿刺情况和敷贴粘合的影响。
方法
2
选择行超声引导颈内静脉穿刺置管的急诊外伤失血患者102例为研究对象,随机分为碘伏组(51例)和氯己定醇组(51例),分别于穿刺前使用0.5%有效碘的碘伏和2.0%葡萄糖酸氯己定+70.0%乙醇消毒。比较2组患者穿刺部位消毒效果、穿刺情况、超声成像情况和敷贴粘合力。
结果
2
2组患者穿刺部位消毒前菌群计数、消毒后菌群计数及消毒合格率比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>
0.05)。2组一次穿刺成功率、穿刺次数和穿刺置管时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。2组超声成像清楚率、敷贴粘合力和穿刺后24 h敷贴起翘或脱落率比较,差异均有统计学意义(
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
对于急诊外伤失血患者,在超声引导颈内静脉穿刺前使用0.5%有效碘的碘伏和2.0%葡萄糖酸氯己定+70.0%乙醇消毒,均可获得较好的消毒效果,其中碘伏消毒能获得更清楚的超声成像,且一次穿刺成功率更高,但敷贴粘合力较差,容易发生起翘或脱落。
Objective
2
To investigate the influence of different disinfectants on the ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture and adhesive application.
Methods
2
A total of 102 emergency patients with traumatic hemorrhage who underwent ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture and catheterization were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided into the iodine group(51 cases) and the chlorhexidine-alcohol group(51 cases). Iodophor (0.5% effective iodine) and 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate+70.0% ethanol were used for disinfection before puncture, respectively. The disinfection effect of the puncture site, puncture condition, ultrasound imaging, and adhesive force of the application of patients were statistically compared between the two groups.
Results
2
There was no significant difference in the bacterial count before disinfection, the bacterial count after disinfection or the qualified rate of disinfection at the puncture site of patients between the two groups (
P
>
0.05). There were significant differences in the success rate of one-time puncture, the number of puncture and the time of puncture and catheterization between the two groups (
P
<
0.05). There were significant differences in the rate of clear ultrasound images, adhesive force and rate of warping or shedding of the application between the two groups (
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
For emergency patients with traumatic hemorrhage, using iodophor(0.5% effective iodine) and 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate+70.0% ethanol disinfection before ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein puncture can achieve good disinfection effects. Iodine disinfection can obtain clearer ultrasound images and a higher success rate of one-time puncture, but the adhesive force of the application is poor, making it prone to warping or shedding.
消毒方法超声引导颈内静脉穿刺一次穿刺成功率敷贴粘合力
disinfection methodsultrasound guidanceinternal jugular vein puncturesuccess rate of one-time punctureapplicationadhesive force
杨犇,程志坤,马启刚,等.超声引导锁骨上入路锁骨下静脉穿刺在颅脑手术中的应用效果[J].局解手术学杂志,2022,31(4):328-332.doi:10.11659/jjssx.08E021081http://dx.doi.org/10.11659/jjssx.08E021081.
方叶,雷恩骏,龚海霞.超声引导下颈内静脉穿刺置管的研究进展[J].江西医药,2022,57(11):2019-2024.doi:10.3969/j.issn. 1006-2238.2022.11.0973http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-2238.2022.11.0973.
尹随,吴昊,陈立如,等.颈内静脉入路与锁骨下静脉入路行输液港置入术的对比分析[J].临床外科杂志,2023,31(7):614-616.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.07.005http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2023.07.005.
段梦娣,王征,马亚男.PICC置管后局部皮肤过敏患者使用氯己定醇的疗效观察[J].河北医药,2023,45(9):1370-1372.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2023.09.020http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2023.09.020.
孟真,魏兰芬,郑云燕,等.某碘伏与胍类复合消毒剂消毒相关性能研究[J].中国消毒学杂志,2021,38(2):84-87.doi:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2021.02.002http://dx.doi.org/10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2021.02.002.
冯文菊,朱冬红,谢敏飞,等.不同消毒剂控制血透患者中心静脉置管感染的效果研究[J].医院管理论坛,2023,40(5):53-55.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9069.2023.05.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9069.2023.05.014.
时丹萍,秦钟.不同消毒方法对超声引导下中心静脉穿刺成像的影响[J].医学理论与实践,2019,32(7):1081-1082.doi:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2019.07.078http://dx.doi.org/10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2019.07.078.
中华人民共和国卫生部.消毒技术规范(2012年版)[M].北京:卫生部卫生法制与监督司,2012:11.
张燕燕,曾辉,郑德良.超声引导下右侧颈内静脉穿刺术在肾衰竭患者血液透析中的应用价值[J].贵州医药,2023,47(5):781-782.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2023.05.063http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-744X.2023.05.063.
Imataki O,Shimatani M,Ohue Y,et al.Effect of ultrasound guided central venous catheter insertion on the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections and mechanical complications[J].BMC Infect Dis,2019,19(1):857.doi:10.1186/s12879-019-4487-0http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4487-0.
Attie GA,Flumignan C,Silva M,et al.What do cochrane systematic reviews say about ultrasund-guided vascular access[J].Sao Paulo Med J,2019,137(3):284-291.doi:10.1590/1516-3180.2019. 0113070519http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0113070519.
中心静脉血管通路装置安全管理专家组.中心静脉血管通路装置安全管理专家共识(2019版)[J].中华外科杂志,2020,58(4):261-272.doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191226-00638http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191226-00638.
Rosenthal VD,Al-Abdely HM,El-kholy AA,et al.International nosocomial infection control consortium report,data summary of 50 countries for 2010-2015:device-associated module[J].Am J Infect Control,2016,44(12):1495-1504.doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.007http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2016.08.007.
孙卸美,兰允平,郑群燕,等.不同消毒法应用于超声引导中心静脉穿刺的消毒效果及成像清晰度比较研究[J].医院管理论坛,2022,39(4):62-64.doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9069.2022. 04.018http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-9069.2022.04.018.
赵婧,张宇婷.关于外周静脉穿刺置入中心静脉导管维护中碘伏待干与75%乙醇脱碘的研究分析[J].临床医药实践,2023,32(13):146-148.doi:10.16047/j.cnki.cn14-1300/r.2023.02.013http://dx.doi.org/10.16047/j.cnki.cn14-1300/r.2023.02.013.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621