A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial

Ignace De Decker; Henk Hoeksema; Jozef Verbelen; Petra De Coninck; Marijn Speeckaert; Sofie De Schepper; Phillip Blondeel; Ali Pirayesh; Stan Monstrey; Karel E Y Claes

doi:10.1093/burnst/tkad015

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial

更新时间：2023-08-29

- A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial
- A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial
- Burns & Trauma 2023年11卷第1期
- 作者机构：
  
  1. Ghent University Hospital
  2. Plastic surgeon in private practice in Amsterdam
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) supplied a grant within Applied Biomedical Research (TBM) for project number T001316N entitled: ‘The application of Glyaderm® as a dermal substitute in the reconstruction of deep burns or other full-thickness skin defects’.
- DOI：10.1093/burnst/tkad015
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2023，
  
  网络出版日期：2023-5-2，
扫描看全文
Ignace De Decker, Henk Hoeksema, Jozef Verbelen, 等. A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial[J]. Burns & Trauma, 2023,11(1).

Ignace De Decker, Henk Hoeksema, Jozef Verbelen, Petra De Coninck, Marijn Speeckaert, Sofie De Schepper, Phillip Blondeel, Ali Pirayesh, Stan Monstrey, Karel E Y Claes, A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial, Burns & Trauma, Volume 11, 2023, tkad015, https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad015
Ignace De Decker, Henk Hoeksema, Jozef Verbelen, 等. A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial[J]. Burns & Trauma, 2023,11(1). DOI： 10.1093/burnst/tkad015.

Ignace De Decker, Henk Hoeksema, Jozef Verbelen, Petra De Coninck, Marijn Speeckaert, Sofie De Schepper, Phillip Blondeel, Ali Pirayesh, Stan Monstrey, Karel E Y Claes, A single-stage bilayered skin reconstruction using Glyaderm® as an acellular dermal regeneration template results in improved scar quality: an intra-individual randomized controlled trial, Burns & Trauma, Volume 11, 2023, tkad015, https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad015 DOI：

摘要

Abstract

BackgroundAbsence of almost the entire reticular dermal layer is inherent to the use of autologous split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) to close full-thickness wounds

often resulting in hypertrophic scars and contractures. Many dermal substitutes have been developed

but unfortunately most have varying results in terms of cosmetic and/or functional improvement as well as patient satisfaction

in addition to high costs. Bilayered skin reconstruction using the human-derived glycerolized acellular dermis (Glyaderm®) has been reported to result in significantly improved scar quality using a two-step procedure. Unlike the necessary two-step procedure for most commercially available dermal substitutes

in this study we aimed to investigate the use of Glyaderm® in a more cost-effective single-stage engrafting. This is a method which

if autografts are available

is preferred by the majority of surgeons given the reduction in costs

hospitalization time and infection rate.MethodsA prospective

randomized

controlled

intra-individual

single-blinded study was performed

investigating the simultaneous application of Glyaderm® and STSG vs. STSG alone in full-thickness burns or comparable deep skin defects. During the acute phase

bacterial load

graft take and time to wound closure were assessed and were the primary outcomes. Aesthetic and functional results (secondary outcomes) were evaluated at 3

9 and 12 months follow-up using subjective and objective scar measurement tools. Biopsies for histological analysis were taken at 3 and 12 months.ResultsA total of 66 patients representing 82 wound comparisons were included. Graft take (>95%)

pain management and healing time were comparable in both groups. At 1 year follow-up

the overall Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale assessed by the patient was significantly in favour of sites where Glyaderm® was used. Not infrequently

patients attributed this difference to improved skin sensation. Histological analysis showed the presence of a well-formed neodermis

with donor elastin present for up to 12 months.ConclusionsA single-stage bilayered reconstruction with Glyaderm® and STSG results in optimal graft take without loss of Glyaderm® nor the overlaying autografts due to infection. The presence of elastin in the neodermis was demonstrated during long-term follow-up in all but one patient

which is a crucial factor contributing to the significantly improved overall scar quality as evaluated by the blinded patients.Trial registrationThe trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov and received the following registration code: NCT01033604.

关键词

Keywords

BurnScarskinGlyaderm®Dermal substituteDermal regeneration templateElastin

references

1.Gsa P, Phillips G, Andrews S. The use of dermal regeneration templates for primary burns surgery in a Uk regional burns Centre. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020;33:245–52.

2.Claes KEY, De Decker I, Monstrey S, Shoham Y, Vyncke T, Depypere B, et al. Helpful hints in deciding what and when to operate after enzymatic debridement. Burns. 2022;49:80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2022.01.004.

3.Rijpma D, Claes KEY, De Decker I, Verbelen J, Pijpe A, Van Zuijlen P. The meek micrograft technique for burns; review on its outcomes. Searching for the superior skin grafting technique. Burns. 2022;48:1287–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2022.05.011.

4.Lohana P, Hassan S, Watson SB. Integra™ in burns reconstruction: our experience and report of an unusual immunological reaction. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2014;27:17–21.

5.Widjaja W, Tan J, Maitz PKM. Efficacy of dermal substitute on deep dermal to full thickness burn injury: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87:446–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13920.

6.Gauglitz GG, Korting HC, Pavicic T, Ruzicka T, Jeschke MG. Hypertrophic scarring and keloids: Pathomechanisms and current and emerging treatment strategies. Mol Med. 2011;17:113–25. https://doi.org/10.2119/molmed.2009.00153.

7.Rudnicki PA, Purt B, True D, Siordia H, Lohmeier S, Chan RK. Single-stage composite skin reconstruction using a dermal regeneration template. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2622. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002622.

8.Finnerty CC, Jeschke MG, Branski LK, Barret JP, Dziewulski P, Herndon DN. Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury. Lancet. 2016;388:1427–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4.

9.Steinstraesser L, Flak E, Witte B, Ring A, Tilkorn D, Hauser J, et al. Pressure garment therapy alone and in combination with silicone for the prevention of hypertrophic scarring: randomized controlled trial with intraindividual comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:306e–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c69.

10.Pruksapong C, Burusapat C, Hongkarnjanakul N. Efficacy of silicone gel versus silicone gel sheet in hypertrophic scar prevention of deep hand burn patients with skin graft: a prospective randomized controlled trial and systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e3190. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003190.

11.Deitch EE. Hypertrophic burn scars analysis of variables. J Trauma. 1983;23:895–8.

12.Lawrence JW, Mason ST, Schomer K, Klein MB. Epidemiology and impact of scarring after burn injury: a systematic review of the literature. J Burn Care Res. 2012;33:136–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182374452.

13.Bombaro KM, Engrav LH, Carrougher GJ, Wiechman SA, Faucher L, Costa BA, et al. What is the prevalence of hypertrophic scarring following burns? Burns. 2003;29:299–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(03)00067-6.

14.De Decker I, Hoeksema H, Vanlerberghe E, Beeckman A, Verbelen J, De Coninck P, et al. Occlusion and hydration of scars: moisturizers versus silicone gels. Burns. 2022;49:365–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2022.04.025.

15.De Decker I, Hoeksema H, Verbelen J, Vanlerberghe E, De Coninck P, Speeckaert MM, et al. The use of fluid silicone gels in the prevention and treatment of hypertrophic scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns. 2022;48:491–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2022.03.004.

16.De Decker I, Hoeksema H, Speeckaert M, Delanghe JR, Blondeel P, Van Vlierberghe S, et al. Treatment of hypertrophic scars with corticoid-embedded dissolving microneedles. Journal of burn care and research. n.d.;44:158–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2018.1471059.

17.Pirayesh A, De Decker I, Richters CD, Paauw NJ, Hoeksema H, Hoekstra MJ, et al. Comparison of Glyaderm with different dermal substitute matrices in a porcine wound model. JPRAS Open. 2022;34:257–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.09.005.

18.Druecke D, Lamme EN, Hermann S, Pieper J, May PS, Steinau HU, et al. Modulation of scar tissue formation using different dermal regeneration templates in the treatment of experimental full-thickness wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2004;12:518–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.012504.x.

19.Rippa AL, Kalabusheva EP, Vorotelyak EA. Regeneration of dermis: scarring and cells involved. Cell. 2019;8:607. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8060607.

20.Rnjak J, Wise SG, Mithieux SM, Weiss AS. Severe burn injuries and the role of elastin in the design of dermal substitutes. Tissue Eng - Part B Rev. 2011;17:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0452.

21.Debels H, Hamdi M, Abberton K, Morrison W. Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes: a critical review of current options. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3:e284. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000219.

22.Bell E, Ivarsson B, Merrill C. Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative potential in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979;76:1274–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.3.1274.

23.Dallon JC, Ehrlich HP. A review of fibroblast-populated collagen lattices. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16:472–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00392.x.

24.Mithieux SM, Weiss AS. Design of an elastin-layered dermal regeneration template. Acta Biomater. 2017;52:33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.11.054.

25.Cohen BE, Geronemus RG, McDaniel DH, Brauer JA. The role of elastic fibers in scar formation and treatment. Dermatologic Surg. 2017;43 Suppl 1:S19–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000840.

26.Pirayesh A, Hoeksema H, Richters C, Verbelen J, Monstrey S. Glyaderm dermal substitute: clinical application and long-term results in 55 patients. Burns. 2014;41:132–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.05.013.

27.Richters CD, Pirayesh A, Hoeksema H, Kamperdijk EWA, Kreis RW, Dutrieux RP, et al. Development of a dermal matrix from glycerol preserved allogeneic skin. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008;9:309–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-008-9073-4.

28.Brusselaers N, Pirayesh A, Hoeksema H, Richters CD, Verbelen J, Beele H, et al. Skin replacement in burn wounds. J Trauma. 2010;68:490–501. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181c9c074.

29.Pirayesh A, Dur AHM, Paauw NJ, Monstrey S, Kreis RW, Hoekstra MJ, et al. Evaluation of acellular dermis for closure of Abdominal Wall defects in a rat model. Eur Surg Res. 2008;41:346–52. https://doi.org/10.1159/000161079.

30.van Baare J, Buitenwerf J, Hoekstra MJ, du Pont JS. Virucidal effect of glycerol as used in donor skin preservation. Burns. 1994;20:S77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(94)90096-5.

31.Marshall L, Ghosh MM, Boyce SG, MacNeil S, Freedlander E, Kudesia G. Effect of glycerol on intracellular virus survival: implications for the clinical use of glycerol-preserved cadaver skin. Burns. 1995;21:356–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(95)00006-2.

32.Yeo SY, Hamzan MI, Wan Sulaiman WA, Halim AS. The cost-effectiveness of maintaining an in-house glycerol-preserved skin bank. Burns. 2022;48:390–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2021.05.001.

33.Rooney P, Eagle M, Hogg P, Lomas R, Kearney J. Sterilisation of skin allograft with gamma irradiation. Burns. 2008;34:664–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.08.021.

34.Kawałkiewicz W, Matthews-Kozanecka M, Janus-Kubiak M, Kubisz L, Hojan-Jezierska D. Instrumental diagnosis of facial skin—a necessity or a pretreatment recommendation in esthetic medicine. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20:875–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13638.

35.Spronk I, Stortelers A, Van Der Vlies CH, Van Zuijlen PPM, Pijpe A. Scar quality in children with burns 5 – 7 years after injury: a cross-sectional multicentre study. Wound Repair Regen. 2021;29:951–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12953.

36.Philandrianos C, Andrac-Meyer L, Mordon S, Feuerstein JM, Sabatier F, Veran J, et al. Comparison of five dermal substitutes in full-thickness skin wound healing in a porcine model. Burns. 2012; 38: 820–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.008.

37.Arno AI, Jeschke MG. The use of dermal substitutes in burn surgery: acute phase. Dermal Replace Gen Burn Plast Surg Tissue Eng Clin Pract. 2014;9783709115:193–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1586-2_16.

38.Shahin H, Elmasry M, Steinvall I, Söberg F, El-Serafi A. Vascularization is the next challenge for skin tissue engineering as a solution for burn management. Burn Trauma. 2020;8:22. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkaa022.

39.Yi CR, Kim JH, Joon Y, Ph D. The capacity of 2 mm Matriderm as a dermal substitute in single stage skin resurfacing. J Korean Burn Soc. 2015;18:19–23.

40.Boháč M, Danišovič Ľ, Koller J, Dragúňová J, Varga I. What happens to an acellular dermal matrix after implantation in the human body? A histological and electron microscopic study. Eur J Histochem. 2018;62:1–11. https://doi.org/10.4081/ejh.2018.2873.

41.Wen Q, Mithieux SM, Weiss AS. Elastin biomaterials in dermal repair. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:280–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.08.005.

42.Hur GY, Seo DK, Lee JW. Contracture of skin graft in human burns: effect of artificial dermis. Burns. 2014;40:1497–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.08.007.

43.Delgado LM, Bayon Y, Pandit A, Zeugolis DI. To cross-link or not to cross-link? Cross-linking associated foreign body response of collagen-based devices. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2015;21:298–313. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0290.

44.Ji H, Sukarto A, Deegan D, Fan F. Characterization of inflammatory and fibrotic aspects of tissue Remodeling of acellular dermal matrix in a nonhuman primate model. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021;9:e3420. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003420.

45.Chepla KJ, Dagget JR, Soltanian HT. The partial AlloDerm™ sling: reducing allograft costs associated with breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:924–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.02.016.

46.de Henau M, Kruit AS, Ulrich DJO. Reconstruction of full thickness wounds using glyaderm in a single-staged procedure. Cell Tissue Bank. 2021;22:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-021-09907-x.

47.Lamy J, Gourari A, Atlan M, Zakine G. Use of Matriderm® 1mm in reconstructive surgery. Series of 31 cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013;58:235–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2013.01.001.

48.Park JY, Lee TG, Kim JY, Lee MC, Chung YK, Lee WJ. Acellular dermal matrix to treat full thickness skin defects: follow-up subjective and objective skin quality assessments. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2014;15:14–21. https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2014.15.1.14.

49.Gonzalez SR, Wolter KG, Yuen JC. Infectious complications associated with the use of Integra: a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020;8:e2869. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002869.

50.Watfa W, di Summa PG, Meuli J, Raffoul W, Bauquis O. MatriDerm decreases donor site morbidity after radial forearm free flap harvest in transgender surgery. J Sex Med. 2017;14:1277–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.08.003.

51.Dantzer E. Place of skin substitutes in burns sequelae. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2011;56:369–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2011.08.009.

52.Verbelen J, Hoeksema H, Pirayesh A, Van Landuyt K, Monstrey S. Exposed tibial bone after burns: flap reconstruction versus dermal substitute. Burns. 2016;42:e31–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.08.013.

53.Doornaert M, Depypere B, Creytens D, Declercq H, Taminau J, Lemeire K, et al. Human decellularized dermal matrix seeded with adipose-derived stem cells enhances wound healing in a murine model: experimental study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019;46:4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.033.

查看原文

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

Vascularization is the next challenge for skin tissue engineering as a solution for burn management

Laser management of hypertrophic burn scars: a comprehensive review

Metabolic reprogramming in skin wound healing

Luminol-conjugated cyclodextrin biological nanoparticles for the treatment of severe burn-induced intestinal barrier disruption

The impact of burn injury on the central nervous system