Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives

Kaige Xu; Xiaozhuo Wu; Xingying Zhang; Malcolm Xing

doi:10.1093/burnst/tkac033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives

更新时间：2023-09-05

- Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives
- Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives
- Burns & Trauma 2022年10卷第1期
- 作者机构：
  
  Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  None.
- DOI：10.1093/burnst/tkac033
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2022，
  
  网络出版日期：2022-10-5，
扫描看全文
Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives[J]. Burns & Trauma, 2022,10(1).

Kaige Xu, Xiaozhuo Wu, Xingying Zhang, Malcolm Xing, Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives, Burns & Trauma, Volume 10, 2022, tkac033, https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac033
Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives[J]. Burns & Trauma, 2022,10(1). DOI： 10.1093/burnst/tkac033.

Kaige Xu, Xiaozhuo Wu, Xingying Zhang, Malcolm Xing, Bridging wounds: tissue adhesives’ essential mechanisms, synthesis and characterization, bioinspired adhesives and future perspectives, Burns & Trauma, Volume 10, 2022, tkac033, https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac033 DOI：

摘要

Abstract

Bioadhesives act as a bridge in wound closure by forming an effective interface to protect against liquid and gas leakage and aid the stoppage of bleeding. To their credit

tissue adhesives have made an indelible impact on almost all wound-related surgeries. Their unique properties include minimal damage to tissues

low chance of infection

ease of use and short wound-closure time. In contrast

classic closures

like suturing and stapling

exhibit potential additional complications with long operation times and undesirable inflammatory responses. Although tremendous progress has been made in the development of tissue adhesives

they are not yet ideal. Therefore

highlighting and summarizing existing adhesive designs and synthesis

and comparing the different products will contribute to future development. This review first provides a summary of current commercial traditional tissue adhesives. Then

based on adhesion interaction mechanisms

the tissue adhesives are categorized into three main types: adhesive patches that bind molecularly with tissue

tissue-stitching adhesives based on pre-polymer or precursor solutions

and bioinspired or biomimetic tissue adhesives. Their specific adhesion mechanisms

properties and related applications are discussed. The adhesion mechanisms of commercial traditional adhesives as well as their limitations and shortcomings are also reviewed. Finally

we also discuss the future perspectives of tissue adhesives.

关键词

Keywords

Adhesive patchAdhesion mechanismNature-inspiredTissue adhesivesBioadhesives

references

1.Armitage J, Lockwood S. Skin incisions and wound closure. Surgery (Oxford). 2011;29:496–501.

2.Cooney G, Kiernan A, Winter D, Simms C. Optimized wound closure using a biomechanical abdominal model. Br J Surg. 2018;105:395–400.

3.Kuo F, Lee D, Rogers GS. Prospective, randomized, blinded study of a new wound closure film versus cutaneous suture for surgical wound closure. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:676–81.

4.Ghoreishian M, Gheisari R, Fayazi M. Tissue adhesive and suturing for closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e14–6.

5.Artzi N. Sticking with the pattern for a safer glue. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:205ec161–1.

6.George W. Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg. 1991;78:337–41.

7.Pai D, Shenoy R, Chethan K. Comparison of non-absorbable (polypropylene) versus delayed absorbable (polydioxanone) suture material for abdominal wound closure after laparotomy. Int Surg J. 2018;5:1690–6.

8.Takayama S, Yamamoto T, Tsuchiya C, Noguchi H, Sato J, Ishii Y. Comparing Steri-strip and surgical staple wound closures after primary total knee arthroplasties. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27:113–8.

9.Katz S, Izhar M, Mirelman D. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection. Ann Surg. 1981;194:35.

10.Galal I, El-Hindawy K. Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection. Am J Surg. 2011;202:133–8.

11.Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park K. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1157–68.

12.Essani R, Bergamaschi R. Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a review. Gastroentero Pl/Gastroentero. 2009;16:123–7.

13.Cai W, Shen K, Ji P, Jia Y, Han S, Zhang W, et al. The notch pathway attenuates burn-induced acute lung injury in rats by repressing reactive oxygen species. Burns Trauma. 2022;10:tkac008. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac008.

14.Donkerwolcke M, Burny F, Muster D. Tissues and bone adhesives—historical aspects. Biomaterials. 1998;19:1461–6.

15.Mehdizadeh M, Yang J. Design strategies and applications of tissue bioadhesives. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13:271–88.

16.Vakalopoulos KA, Daams F, Wu Z, Timmermans L, Jeekel JJ, Kleinrensink G-J, et al. Tissue adhesives in gastrointestinal anastomosis: a systematic review. J Surg Res. 2013;180:290–300.

17.Chen S, Zhang M, Shao X, Wang X, Zhang L, Xu P, et al. A laminin mimetic peptide SIKVAV-conjugated chitosan hydrogel promoting wound healing by enhancing angiogenesis, re-epithelialization and collagen deposition. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:6798–804.

18.Guo Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, Li X, Wang Q, Zhong W, et al. Snake extract-laden hemostatic bioadhesive gel cross-linked by visible light. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabf9635. https://doi.10.1126/sciadv.abf9635.

19.Xu K, Chang Q, Liu Y, Xing M. In: Bingyun Li, Thomas Fintan Moriarty, Thomas Webster, Malcolm Xing (eds). Recent Physical Interaction-based Bioadhesives.New York City, US: Racing for the Surface: Springer, 2020, 693–721.

20.Cronkite EP, Lozner EL, Deaver JM. Use of thrombin and fibrinogen in skin grafting: preliminary report. JAMA. 1944;124:976–8.

21.Bré LP, Zheng Y, Pêgo AP, Wang W. Taking tissue adhesives to the future: from traditional synthetic to new biomimetic approaches. Biomater Sci. 2013;1:239–53.

22.Chen Y, Cheng W, Teng L, Jin M, Lu B, Ren L, et al. Graphene oxide hybrid supramolecular hydrogels with self-healable, bioadhesive and stimuli-responsive properties and drug delivery application. Macromol Mater Eng. 2018;303:1700660. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201700660.

23.Spotnitz W. In: David H Sierra, Renato Saltz (des). History of tissue adhesive. Lancaster, PA:Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., 1996.

24.Li X, Zhou J, Liu Z, Chen J, Lü S, Sun H, et al. A PNIPAAm-based thermosensitive hydrogel containing SWCNTs for stem cell transplantation in myocardial repair. Biomaterials. 2014;35:5679–88.

25.Ayyıldız SN, Ayyıldız A. Cyanoacrylic tissue glues: biochemical properties and their usage in urology. Turk J Urol. 2017;43:14–24.

26.Bravo-Osuna I, Vauthier C, Farabollini A, Palmieri GF, Ponchel G. Mucoadhesion mechanism of chitosan and thiolated chitosan-poly (isobutyl cyanoacrylate) core-shell nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2233–43.

27.Nicolas J, Vauthier C. In: Wang DO, Packwood D (ed). Poly (Alkyl Cyanoacrylate) Nanosystems.New York City, US: Intracellular Delivery: Springer, 2011, 225–50.

28.Ritterband DC, Meskin SW, Shapiro DE, Kusmierczyk J, Seedor JA, Koplin RS. Laboratory model of tissue adhesive (2-octyl cyanoacrylate) in sealing clear corneal cataract wounds. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:1039–43.

29.Leggat PA, Smith DR, Kedjarune U. Surgical applications of cyanoacrylate adhesives: a review of toxicity. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:209–13.

30.Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Hollander JE. The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:490–6.

31.Yu P, Zhong W. Hemostatic materials in wound care. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkab019. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab019.

32.Janmey PA, Winer JP, Weisel JW. Fibrin gels and their clinical and bioengineering applications. J R Soc Interface. 2009;6:1–10.

33.Radosevich M, Goubran H, Burnouf T. Fibrin sealant: scientific rationale, production methods, properties, and current clinical use. Vox Sang. 1997;72:133–43.

34.Petersen BT, Barkun A, Carpenter S, Chotiprasidhi P, Chuttani R, Silverman W, et al. Tissue adhesives and fibrin glues: November 2003. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:327–33.

35.Pescatore P, Verbeke C, Härle M, Manegold B. Fibrin sealing in peptic ulcer bleeding: the fate of the clot. Endoscopy. 1998;30:519–23.

36.Nistor RF, Chiari FM, Maier H, Hehl K. The fixed combination of collagen with components of fibrin adhesive-a new hemostypic agent in skull base procedures. Skull Base Surg. 1997;7:23–30.

37.Caers J, Reekmans A, Jochmans K, Naegels S, Mana F, Urbain D, et al. Factor V inhibitor after injection of human thrombin (tissucol) into a bleeding peptic ulcer. Endoscopy. 2003;35:542–4.

38.Flahiff C, Feldman D, Saltz R, Huang S. Mechanical properties of fibrin adhesives for blood vessel anastomosis. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26:481–91.

39.Braunwald NS, Gay W, Tatooles CJ. Evaluation of crosslinked gelatin as a tissue adhesive and hemostatic agent: an experimental study. Surgery. 1966;59:1024–30.

40.Nomori H, Horio H. Gelatin-resorcinol–formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde glue-spread stapler prevents air leakage from the lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:352–5.

41.Matsuda S, Iwata H, Se N, Ikada Y. Bioadhesion of gelatin films crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. J Biomed Mater Res J Soc Biomater Jap Soc Biomater Austr Soc Biomater. 1999;45:20–7.

42.Chang MC, Ko C-C, Douglas WH. Conformational change of hydroxyapatite/gelatin nanocomposite by glutaraldehyde. Biomaterials. 2003;24:3087–94.

43.Nomori H, Horio H, Morinaga S, Suemasu K. Gelatin-resorcinol–formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde glue for sealing pulmonary air leaks during thoracoscopic operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:212–6.

44.Bhatia SK. Biomaterials for clinical applications.Germany: Springer New York, 2010.

45.Chao HH, Torchiana DF. BioGlue: albumin/glutaraldehyde sealant in cardiac surgery. J Card Surg. 2003;18:500–3.

46.Fürst W, Banerjee A. Release of glutaraldehyde from an albumin-glutaraldehyde tissue adhesive causes significant in vitro and in vivo toxicity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1522–8.

47.Gruber-Blum S, Petter-Puchner A, Mika K, Brand J, Redl H, Öhlinger W, et al. A comparison of a bovine albumin/glutaraldehyde glue versus fibrin sealant for hernia mesh fixation in experimental onlay and IPOM repair in rats. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:3086–94.

48.Li J, Celiz A, Yang J, Yang Q, Wamala I, Whyte W, et al. Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces. Science. 2017;357:378–81.

49.Yuk H, Varela CE, Nabzdyk CS, Mao X, Padera RF, Roche ET, et al. Dry double-sided tape for adhesion of wet tissues and devices. Nature. 2019;575:169–74.

50.Liu C, Liu X, Liu C, Wang N, Chen H, Yao W, et al. A highly efficient, in situ wet-adhesive dextran derivative sponge for rapid hemostasis. Biomaterials. 2019;205:23–37.

51.Fan C, Xu K, Huang Y, Liu S, Wang T, Wang W, et al. Viscosity and degradation controlled injectable hydrogel for esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Bioact Mater. 2020;6:1150–62.

52.Bui R, Brook MA. Dynamic covalent Schiff-base silicone polymers and elastomers. Polymer. 2019;160:282–90.

53.Ren H, Zhao F, Zhang Q, Huang X, Wang Z. Autophagy and skin wound healing. Burns Trauma. 2022;10:tkac003. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac003.

54.Artzi N, Shazly T, Baker AB, Bon A, Edelman ER. Aldehyde-amine chemistry enables modulated biosealants with tissue-specific adhesion. Adv Mater. 2009;21:3399–403.

55.Liu J, Li J, Yu F, Zhao Y-x. Mo X-m, Pan J-f. In situ forming hydrogel of natural polysaccharides through Schiff base reaction for soft tissue adhesive and hemostasis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;147:653–66.

56.Hong Y, Zhou F, Hua Y, Zhang X, Ni C, Pan D, et al. A strongly adhesive hemostatic hydrogel for the repair of arterial and heart bleeds. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–11.

57.Shao C, Wang M, Meng L, Chang H, Wang B, Xu F, et al. Mussel-inspired cellulose nanocomposite tough hydrogels with synergistic self-healing, adhesive, and strain-sensitive properties. Chem Mater. 2018;30:3110–21.

58.Dong H, Li Q, Cao X. A medical adhesive used in wet environment by blending tannic acid and silk fibroin. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:2694–701.

59.Kim S-H, Kim K, Kim BS, An Y-H, Lee U-J, Lee S-H, et al. Fabrication of polyphenol-incorporated anti-inflammatory hydrogel via high-affinity enzymatic crosslinking for wet tissue adhesion. Biomaterials. 2020;242:119905. https://doi.10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119905.

60.An Y-H, Kim HD, Kim K, Lee S-H, Yim H-G, Kim B-G, et al. Enzyme-mediated tissue adhesive hydrogels for meniscus repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:479–87.

61.Liu B, Wang Y, Miao Y, Zhang X, Fan Z, Singh G, et al. Hydrogen bonds autonomously powered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels with super-elasticity, self-heal and underwater self-adhesion for sutureless skin and stomach surgery and E-skin. Biomaterials. 2018;171:83–96.

62.Bet M, Goissis G, Vargas S, Selistre-de-Araujo H. Cell adhesion and cytotoxicity studies over polyanionic collagen surfaces with variable negative charge and wettability. Biomaterials. 2003;24:131–7.

63.Rao P, Sun TL, Chen L, Takahashi R, Shinohara G, Guo H, et al. Tough hydrogels with fast, strong, and reversible underwater adhesion based on a multiscale design. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1801884. http://doi.10.1002/adma.201801884.

64.Roy CK, Guo HL, Sun TL, Ihsan AB, Kurokawa T, Takahata M, et al. Self-adjustable adhesion of Polyampholyte hydrogels. Adv Mater. 2015;27:7344–8.

65.Cui C, Wu T, Gao F, Fan C, Xu Z, Wang H, et al. An autolytic high strength instant adhesive hydrogel for emergency self-rescue. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1804925. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201804925.

66.Xu K, Liu Y, Bu S, Wu T, Chang Q, Singh G, et al. Egg albumen as a fast and strong medical adhesive glue. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6:1700132. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700132.

67.Ghobril C, Grinstaff M. The chemistry and engineering of polymeric hydrogel adhesives for wound closure: a tutorial. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:1820–35.

68.Oliveira NM, Zhang YS, Ju J, Chen A-Z, Chen Y, Sonkusale SR, et al. Hydrophobic hydrogels: toward construction of floating (bio) microdevices. Chem Mater. 2016;28:3641–8.

69.Lih E, Lee JS, Park KM, Park KD. Rapidly curable chitosan–PEG hydrogels as tissue adhesives for hemostasis and wound healing. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:3261–9.

70.Yu F, Cao X, Du J, Wang G, Chen X. Multifunctional hydrogel with good structure integrity, self-healing, and tissue-adhesive property formed by combining Diels–Alder click reaction and acylhydrazone bond. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:24023–31.

71.Faghihnejad A, Feldman KE, Yu J, Tirrell MV, Israelachvili JN, Hawker CJ, et al. Adhesion and surface interactions of a self-healing polymer with multiple hydrogen-bonding groups. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24:2322–33.

72.Dankers PY, Harmsen MC, Brouwer LA, Van Luyn MJ, Meijer E. A modular and supramolecular approach to bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering. Nat Mater. 2005;4:568–74.

73.Wang H, Liu Y, Cai K, Zhang B, Tang S, Zhang W, et al. Antibacterial polysaccharide-based hydrogel dressing containing plant essential oil for burn wound healing. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkab041. https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkab041.

74.Miyamoto M, Sasakawa S, Ozawa T, Kawaguchi H, Ohtsuka Y. Platelet aggregation induced by latex particles: I. effects of size, surface potential and hydrophobicity of particles. Biomaterials. 1989;10:251–7.

75.Dumas JJ, Kumar R, Seehra J, Somers WS, Mosyak L. Crystal structure of the GpIbα-thrombin complex essential for platelet aggregation. Science. 2003;301:222–6.

76.Chen X, Taguchi T. Enhanced skin adhesive property of hydrophobically modified poly (vinyl alcohol) films. ACS Omega. 2020;5:1519–27.

77.Zhang D, Xu Z, Li H, Fan C, Cui C, Wu T, et al. Fabrication of strong hydrogen-bonding induced coacervate adhesive hydrogels with antibacterial and hemostatic activities. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:1455–63.

78.Yang H, Li C, Tang J, Suo Z. Strong and degradable adhesion of hydrogels. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2:1781–6.

79.Yang J, Bai R, Li J, Yang C, Yao X, Liu Q, et al. Design molecular topology for wet–dry adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:24802–11.

80.Mooney DJ, Silva EA. A glue for biomaterials. Nat Mater. 2007;6:327–8.

81.Xu L, Gao S, Zhou R, Zhou F, Qiao Y, Qiu D. Bioactive pore-forming bone adhesives facilitating cell ingrowth for fracture healing. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1907491. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201907491.

82.Liu J, Lin S, Liu X, Qin Z, Yang Y, Zang J, et al. Fatigue-resistant adhesion of hydrogels. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–9.

83.Dompé M, Cedano-Serrano FJ, Heckert O, van den Heuvel N, van der Gucht J, Tran Y, et al. Thermoresponsive complex Coacervate-based underwater adhesive. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1808179. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201808179.

84.Ryplida B, Lee KD, In I, Park SY. Light-induced swelling-responsive conductive, adhesive, and stretchable wireless film hydrogel as electronic artificial skin. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1903209. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201903209.

85.Davidson MD, Ban E, Schoonen AC, Lee MH, D'Este M, Shenoy VB, et al. Mechanochemical adhesion and plasticity in multifiber hydrogel networks. Adv Mater. 2020;32:1905719. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201905719.

86.Gonzalez MA, Simon JR, Ghoorchian A, Scholl Z, Lin S, Rubinstein M, et al. Strong, tough, stretchable, and self-adhesive hydrogels from intrinsically unstructured proteins. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1604743. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201604743.

87.Bu Y, Zhang L, Sun G, Sun F, Liu J, Yang F, et al. Tetra-PEG based hydrogel sealants for In vivo visceral Hemostasis. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1901580. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201901580.

88.Tan H, Jin D, Qu X, Liu H, Chen X, Yin M, et al. A PEG-lysozyme hydrogel harvests multiple functions as a fit-to-shape tissue sealant for internal-use of body. Biomaterials. 2019;192:392–404.

89.Shagan A, Zhang W, Mehta M, Levi S, Kohane DS, Mizrahi B. Hot glue gun releasing biocompatible tissue adhesive. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1900998. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900998.

90.Zhao X, Liang Y, Huang Y, He J, Han Y, Guo B. Physical double-network hydrogel adhesives with rapid shape adaptability, fast self-healing, antioxidant and NIR/pH stimulus-responsiveness for multidrug-resistant bacterial infection and removable wound dressing. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1910748. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910748.

91.Seo JW, Kim H, Kim K, Choi SQ, Lee HJ. Calcium-modified silk as a biocompatible and strong adhesive for epidermal electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1800802. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201800802.

92.Granskog V, García-Gallego S, von Kieseritzky J, Rosendahl J, Stenlund P, Zhang Y, et al. High-performance thiol–Ene composites unveil a new era of adhesives suited for bone repair. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1800372. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201870180.

93.Li B, Whalen JJ, Humayun MS, Thompson ME. Reversible bioadhesives using tannic acid primed thermally-responsive polymers. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1907478. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907478.

94.Liu X, Zhang Q, Duan L, Gao G. Tough adhesion of nucleobase-Tackifed gels in diverse solvents. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1900450. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900450.

95.Gang H, Liang C. Biological activity of biomimetic dermal papilla spheres prepared by culture of dermal papilla cells of mice based on hanging drops of gelatin methacrylate and its hair-inducing function in nude mice. Zhonghua Shaoshang Zazhi. 2021;37:770–80.

96.Sani ES, Kheirkhah A, Rana D, Sun Z, Foulsham W, Sheikhi A, et al. Sutureless repair of corneal injuries using naturally derived bioadhesive hydrogels. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaav1281. http://doi.10.1126/sciadv.aav1281.

97.Assmann A, Vegh A, Ghasemi-Rad M, Bagherifard S, Cheng G, Sani ES, et al. A highly adhesive and naturally derived sealant. Biomaterials. 2017;140:115–27.

98.Annabi N, Zhang Y-N, Assmann A, Sani ES, Cheng G, Lassaletta AD, et al. Engineering a highly elastic human protein–based sealant for surgical applications. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaai7466. http://doi.10.1126/scitranslmed.aai7466. Erratum in: Sci Transl Med. 2018 Dec 5;10(470): PMID: 28978753.

99.Blacklow S, Li J, Freedman B, Zeidi M, Chen C, Mooney D. Bioinspired mechanically active adhesive dressings to accelerate wound closure. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw3963. http://doi.10.1126/sciadv.aaw3963.

100.Yang J, Bai R, Suo Z. Topological adhesion of wet materials. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1800671. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201800671.

101.Thavarajah D, De Lacy P, Hussain R, Redfern RM. Postoperative cervical cord compression induced by hydrogel (DuraSeal): a possible complication. Spine. 2010;35:E25–6. http://doi.10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b9fc45.

102.Mehdizadeh M, Weng H, Gyawali D, Tang L, Yang J. Injectable citrate-based mussel-inspired tissue bioadhesives with high wet strength for sutureless wound closure. Biomaterials. 2012;33:7972–83.

103.Wang L, Liu Y, Ye G, He Y, Li B, Guan Y, et al. Injectable and conductive cardiac patches repair infarcted myocardium in rats and minipigs. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021;5:1157–73.

104.Du X, Hou Y, Wu L, Li S, Yu A, Kong D, et al. Anti-infective hydrogel adhesive with non-swelling and robust mechanical properties for Sutureless wound closure. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:5682–93.

105.Barrett DG, Bushnell GG, Messersmith PB. Mechanically robust, negative-swelling, mussel-inspired tissue adhesives. Adv Healthc Mater. 2013;2:745–55.

106.Rose S, Prevoteau A, Elzière P, Hourdet D, Marcellan A, Leibler L. Nanoparticle solutions as adhesives for gels and biological tissues. Nature. 2014;505:382–5.

107.Lu X, Shi S, Li H, Gerhard E, Lu Z, Tan X, et al. Magnesium oxide-crosslinked low-swelling citrate-based mussel-inspired tissue adhesives. Biomaterials. 2020;232:119719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119719.

108.Inoue A, Yuk H, Lu B, Zhao X. Strong adhesion of wet conducting polymers on diverse substrates. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaay5394. http://doi.10.1126/sciadv.aay5394.

109.Costa RR, da Costa DS, Reis RL, Pashkuleva I. Bioinspired baroplastic glycosaminoglycan sealants for soft tissues. Acta Biomater. 2019;87:108–17.

110.Zhao Q, Lee DW, Ahn BK, Seo S, Kaufman Y, Israelachvili JN, et al. Underwater contact adhesion and microarchitecture in polyelectrolyte complexes actuated by solvent exchange. Nat Mater. 2016;15:407–12.

111.Ryu JH, Kim HJ, Kim K, Yoon G, Wang Y, Choi GS, et al. Multipurpose intraperitoneal adhesive patches. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1900495. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201900495.

112.Gill SK, Roohpour N, Topham PD, Tighe BJ. Tunable denture adhesives using biomimetic principles for enhanced tissue adhesion in moist environments. Acta Biomater. 2017;63:326–35.

113.Pan Z, Zhang K-R, Gao H-L, Zhou Y, Yan B-B, Yang C, et al. Activating proper inflammation for wound-healing acceleration via mesoporous silica nanoparticle tissue adhesive. Nano Res. 2020;13:373–9.

114.Okada M, Hara ES, Yabe A, Okada K, Shibata Y, Torii Y, et al. Titanium as an instant adhesive for biological soft tissue. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2020;7:1902089. https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201902089.

115.Yang K, Wang Y, You Y, Yang H, Hao X. Non-equilibrium polymerization enables adhesive material with anti-freezing, multipurpose adhesion, long-term air stability and anisotropic deformation. Chem Eng J. 2020;382:122926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122926.

116.Gao Y, Wu K, Suo Z. Photodetachable adhesion. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1806948. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806948.

117.Walker BW, Lara RP, Yu CH, Sani ES, Kimball W, Joyce S, et al. Engineering a naturally-derived adhesive and conductive cardiopatch. Biomaterials. 2019;207:89–101.

118.Yi H, Seong M, Sun K, Hwang I, Lee K, Cha C, et al. Wet-responsive, reconfigurable, and biocompatible hydrogel adhesive films for transfer printing of Nanomembranes. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1706498. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706498.

119.Yang H, Li C, Yang M, Pan Y, Yin Q, Tang J, et al. Printing hydrogels and elastomers in arbitrary sequence with strong adhesion. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1901721. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201901721.

120.Ge L, Li Q, Huang Y, Yang S, Ouyang J, Bu S, et al. Polydopamine-coated paper-stack nanofibrous membranes enhancing adipose stem cells' adhesion and osteogenic differentiation. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:6917–23.

121.Zhang S, Xu K, Darabi MA, Yuan Q, Xing M. Mussel-inspired alginate gel promoting the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and anti-infection. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:496–504.

122.Hsu HH, Liu Y, Wang Y, Li B, Luo G, Xing M, et al. Mussel-inspired autonomously self-healable all-in-one supercapacitor with biocompatible hydrogel. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:6935–48.

123.Wang L, Zhang X, He Y, Wang Y, Zhong W, Mequanint K, et al. Ultralight conductive and elastic aerogel for skeletal muscle atrophy regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1806200. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806200.

124.Song C, Zhang X, Wang L, Wen F, Xu K, Xiong W, et al. An injectable conductive three-dimensional elastic network by tangled surgical-suture spring for heart repair. ACS Nano. 2019;13:14122–37.

125.Zhang S, Xu K, Ge L, Darabi MA, Xie F, Derakhshanfar S, et al. A novel nano-silver coated and hydrogel-impregnated polyurethane nanofibrous mesh for ventral hernia repair. RSC Adv. 2016;6:90571–8.

126.Xu H, Zhang G, Xu K, Wang L, Yu L, Xing MM, et al. Mussel-inspired dual-functional PEG hydrogel inducing mineralization and inhibiting infection in maxillary bone reconstruction. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;90:379–86.

127.Han L, Liu K, Wang M, Wang K, Fang L, Chen H, et al. Mussel-inspired adhesive and conductive hydrogel with long-lasting moisture and extreme temperature tolerance. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28:1704195. http://doi.10.1002/adfm.201704195.

128.Liao M, Wan P, Wen J, Gong M, Wu X, Wang Y, et al. Wearable, healable, and adhesive epidermal sensors assembled from mussel-inspired conductive hybrid hydrogel framework. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27:1703852. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201703852.

129.Salzlechner C, Haghighi T, Huebscher I, Walther AR, Schell S, Gardner A, et al. Adhesive hydrogels for maxillofacial tissue regeneration using minimally invasive procedures. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9:1901134. https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901134.

130.Ruprai H, Shanu A, Mawad D, Hook JM, Kilian K, George L, et al. Porous chitosan adhesives with L-DOPA for enhanced photochemical tissue bonding. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:314–26.

131.Jiang J, Wan W, Ge L, Bu S, Zhong W, Xing M. Mussel-inspired nanofibrous sheet for suture-less stomach incision surgery. Chem Commun. 2015;51:8695–8.

132.Wang L, Jiang J, Hua W, Darabi A, Song X, Song C, et al. Mussel-inspired conductive cryogel as cardiac tissue patch to repair myocardial infarction by migration of conductive nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:4293–305.

133.Jiang P, Li S, Lai J, Zheng H, Lin C, Shi P, et al. Nanoparticle-programmed surface for drug release and cell regulation via reversible hybridization reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:4467–74.

134.Wu T, Cui C, Huang Y, Liu Y, Fan C, Han X, et al. Coadministration of an adhesive conductive hydrogel patch and an injectable hydrogel to treat myocardial infarction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;12:2039–48.

135.Han L, Lu X, Liu K, Wang K, Fang L, Weng L-T, et al. Mussel-inspired adhesive and tough hydrogel based on nanoclay confined dopamine polymerization. ACS Nano. 2017;11:2561–74.

136.Cui C, Fan C, Wu Y, Xiao M, Wu T, Zhang D, et al. Water-triggered Hyperbranched polymer universal adhesives: from strong underwater adhesion to rapid sealing Hemostasis. Adv Mater. 2019;31:1905761. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201905761.

137.Waite JH. Mussel adhesion–essential footwork. J Exp Biol. 2017;220:517–30.

138.Ahn BK. Perspectives on mussel-inspired wet adhesion. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139:10166–71.

139.Jiang J, Huang Y, Wang Y, Xu H, Xing M, Zhong W. Mussel-inspired dopamine and carbon nanotube leading to a biocompatible self-rolling conductive hydrogel film. Materials. 2017;10:964. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10080964.

140.Yu J, Wei W, Danner E, Ashley RK, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH. Mussel protein adhesion depends on interprotein thiol-mediated redox modulation. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:588–90.

141.Wei K, Senturk B, Matter MT, Wu X, Herrmann IK, Rottmar M, et al. Mussel-inspired injectable hydrogel adhesive formed under mild conditions features near-native tissue properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:47707–19.

142.Gebbie MA, Wei W, Schrader AM, Cristiani TR, Dobbs HA, Idso M, et al. Tuning underwater adhesion with cation–π interactions. Nat Chem. 2017;9:473–9.

143.Tiu BDB, Delparastan P, Ney MR, Gerst M, Messersmith PB. Enhanced adhesion and cohesion of bioinspired dry/wet pressure-sensitive adhesives. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:28296–306.

144.Lee D, Bae H, Ahn J, Kang T, Seo D-G, Hwang DS. Catechol-thiol-based dental adhesive inspired by underwater mussel adhesion. Acta Biomater. 2020;103:92–101.

145.Deepankumar K, Lim C, Polte I, Zappone B, Labate C, De Santo MP, et al. Supramolecular β-sheet suckerin–based underwater adhesives. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1907534. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907534.

146.Massoumi B, Abbasian M, Jahanban-Esfahlan R, Mohammad-Rezaei R, Khalilzadeh B, Samadian H, et al. A novel bio-inspired conductive, biocompatible, and adhesive terpolymer based on polyaniline, polydopamine, and polylactide as scaffolding biomaterial for tissue engineering application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;147:1174–84.

147.Li S, Chen N, Li Y, Zhao J, Hou X, Yuan X. Environment-dependent adhesive Behaviors of mussel-inspired coordinate-crosslinked bioadhesives. Macromol Mater Eng. 2020;305:1900620. https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201900620.

148.Seo S, Lee DW, Ahn JS, Cunha K, Filippidi E, Ju SW, et al. Significant performance enhancement of polymer resins by bioinspired dynamic bonding. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1703026. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703026.

149.Han L, Wang M, Li P, Gan D, Yan L, Xu J, et al. Mussel-inspired tissue-adhesive hydrogel based on the polydopamine–chondroitin sulfate complex for growth-factor-free cartilage regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:28015–26.

150.Cheng H, Yue K, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Liu Y, Khalilpour A, Li B, et al. Mussel-inspired multifunctional hydrogel coating for prevention of infections and enhanced osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:11428–39.

151.Higginson CJ, Malollari KG, Xu Y, Kelleghan AV, Ricapito NG, Messersmith PB. Bioinspired design provides high-strength benzoxazine structural adhesives. Angew Chem. 2019;131:12399–407.

152.Jeon EY, Lee J, Kim BJ, Joo KI, Kim KH, Lim G, et al. Bio-inspired swellable hydrogel-forming double-layered adhesive microneedle protein patch for regenerative internal/external surgical closure. Biomaterials. 2019;222:119439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119439.

153.Hong S, Pirovich D, Kilcoyne A, Huang CH, Lee H, Weissleder R. Supramolecular Metallo-bioadhesive for minimally invasive use. Adv Mater. 2016;28:8675–80.

154.Huang N, Liu Y, Fang Y, Zheng S, Wu J, Wang M, et al. Gold nanoparticles induce tumor vessel normalization and impair metastasis by inhibiting endothelial Smad2/3 Signaling. ACS Nano. 2020;14:7940–58.

155.Wilker JJ. Materials science: how to suck like an octopus. Nature. 2017;546:358–9.

156.Chen R, Fu Q, Liu Z, Hu X, Liu M, Song R, editors. Design and experimental research of an underwater vibration suction module inspired by octopus suckers. ROBIO, 2017 IEEE International Conference on.New York City, US: IEEE, 2017.

157.Kier WM, Smith AM. The structure and adhesive mechanism of octopus suckers. ICB. 2002;42:1146–53.

158.Hou J, Wright E, Bonser RH, Jeronimidis G. Development of biomimetic squid-inspired suckers. J Bionic Eng. 2012;9:484–93.

159.Varenberg M, Gorb SN. Hexagonal surface micropattern for dry and wet friction. Adv Mater. 2009;21:483–6.

160.Wang S, Luo H, Linghu C, Song J. Elastic energy storage enabled magnetically actuated, octopus-inspired smart adhesive. Adv Funct Mater. 2021;31:2009217. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202009217.

161.Dayan CB, Chun S, Krishna-Subbaiah N, Drotlef DM, Akolpoglu MB, Sitti M. 3D printing of elastomeric bioinspired complex adhesive microstructures. Adv Mater. 2021;33:2103826. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103826.

162.Baik S, Kim DW, Park Y, Lee T-J, Ho Bhang S, Pang C. A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature. 2017;546:396–400.

163.Chang W-Y, Wu Y, Chung Y-C. Facile fabrication of ordered nanostructures from protruding nanoballs to recessional nanosuckers via solvent treatment on covered nanosphere assembled monolayers. Nano Lett. 2014;14:1546–50.

164.Chen Y-C, Yang H. Octopus-inspired assembly of nanosucker arrays for dry/wet adhesion. ACS Nano. 2017;11:5332–8.

165.Kim DW, Baik S, Min H, Chun S, Lee HJ, Kim KH, et al. Highly permeable skin patch with conductive hierarchical architectures inspired by amphibians and octopi for omnidirectionally enhanced wet adhesion. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1807614. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201807614.

166.Liu Z, Wang X, Qi D, Xu C, Yu J, Liu Y, et al. High-adhesion stretchable electrodes based on Nanopile interlocking. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1603382. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603382.

167.Chipara AC, Brunetto G, Özden Ş, Haspel H, Kumbhakar P, Kukovecz A, et al. Nature inspired solid-liquid phase amphibious adhesive. Soft Matter. 2020;16:5854–60.

168.Liimatainen V, Drotlef DM, Son D, Sitti M. Liquid-superrepellent bioinspired fibrillar adhesives. Adv Mater. 2020;32:2000497. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202000497.

169.Drotlef DM, Amjadi M, Yunusa M, Sitti M. Bioinspired composite microfibers for skin adhesion and signal amplification of wearable sensors. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1701353. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701353.

170.Liang C, Ye Z, Xue B, Zeng L, Wu W, Zhong C, et al. Self-assembled nanofibers for strong underwater adhesion: the trick of barnacles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:25017–25.

171.Mertens SF, Hemmi A, Muff S, Gröning O, De Feyter S, Osterwalder J, et al. Switching stiction and adhesion of a liquid on a solid. Nature. 2016;534:676–9.

172.Kizilkan E, Gorb SN. Combined effect of the microstructure and underlying surface curvature on the performance of biomimetic adhesives. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1704696. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201704696.

173.Barreau V, Hensel R, Guimard NK, Ghatak A, McMeeking RM, Arzt E. Fibrillar elastomeric micropatterns create tunable adhesion even to rough surfaces. Adv Funct Mater. 2016;26:4687–94.

174.Maier GP, Rapp MV, Waite JH, Israelachvili JN, Butler A. Adaptive synergy between catechol and lysine promotes wet adhesion by surface salt displacement. Science. 2015;349:628–32.

175.Xu X, Xia X, Zhang K, Rai A, Li Z, Zhao P, et al. Bioadhesive hydrogels demonstrating pH-independent and ultrafast gelation promote gastric ulcer healing in pigs. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:aba8014. http://doi.10.1126/scitranslmed.aba8014.

176.Qi X, Yao X, Deng S, Zhou T, Fu Q. Water-induced shape memory effect of graphene oxide reinforced polyvinyl alcohol nanocomposites. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2:2240–9.

177.Xie T. Tunable polymer multi-shape memory effect. Nature. 2010;464:267–70.

178.Yang SY, O'Cearbhaill ED, Sisk GC, Park KM, Cho WK, Villiger M, et al. A bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1–10.

179.An R, Zhang X, Han L, Wang X, Zhang Y, Shi L, et al. Healing, flexible, high thermal sensitive dual-network ionic conductive hydrogels for 3D linear temperature sensor. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;107:110310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110310.

180.Zeng Y, Li T, Yao Y, Li T, Hu L, Marconnet A. Thermally conductive reduced graphene oxide thin films for extreme temperature sensors. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1901388. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201901388.

181.Yao MS, Lv XJ, Fu ZH, Li WH, Deng WH, Wu GD, et al. Layer-by-layer assembled conductive metal–organic framework Nanofilms for room-temperature Chemiresistive sensing. Angew Chem. 2017;129:16737–41.

182.Montgomery M, Ahadian S, Huyer LD, Rito ML, Civitarese RA, Vanderlaan RD, et al. Flexible shape-memory scaffold for minimally invasive delivery of functional tissues. Nat Mater. 2017;16:1038–46.

183.North MA, Del Grosso CA, Wilker JJ. High strength underwater bonding with polymer mimics of mussel adhesive proteins. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9:7866–72.

184.Cui C, Wu T, Chen X, Liu Y, Li Y, Xu Z, et al. A Janus hydrogel wet adhesive for internal tissue repair and anti-postoperative adhesion. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:2005689.

185.Wang Y, Shang L, Chen G, Sun L, Zhang X, Zhao Y. Bioinspired structural color patch with anisotropic surface adhesion. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaax8258. https://doi.10.1126/sciadv.aax8258.

186.Boutry CM, Beker L, Kaizawa Y, Vassos C, Tran H, Hinckley AC, et al. Biodegradable and flexible arterial-pulse sensor for the wireless monitoring of blood flow. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3:47–57.

187.Darabi MA, Khosrozadeh A, Wang Q, Xing M. Gum sensor: a stretchable, wearable, and foldable sensor based on carbon nanotube/chewing gum membrane. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7:26195–205.

188.Chang Q, Darabi MA, Liu Y, He Y, Zhong W, Mequanin K, et al. Hydrogels from natural egg white with extraordinary stretchability, direct-writing 3D printability and self-healing for fabrication of electronic sensors and actuators. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7:24626–40.

189.Chang Q, He Y, Liu Y, Zhong W, Wang Q, Lu F, et al. Protein gel phase transition: toward superiorly transparent and hysteresis-free wearable electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30:1910080. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910080.

190.Chun S, Son W, Kim DW, Lee J, Min H, Jung H, et al. Water-resistant and skin-adhesive wearable electronics using graphene fabric sensor with octopus-inspired microsuckers. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:16951–7.

查看原文

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据