Objective To analyze the quality of the final exam papers of 2014 grade five-year medical students

checking different professional students master level of the course

perfecting the question bank construction

checking the quality of teaching and learning

provide the basis for further discusses teaching reform methods. Methods SPSS 21.0 was used for statistical analysis of 133 papers. Results The highest score was 93.5

the lowest score was 52.0

and the average score was 70.6±9.00. 6 students failing

occupy 4.51%; The overall difficulty coefficient of the examination paper (P) was 0.71

and the difference of the questions (D) were both > 0.600 and the overall reliability was 0.764. The examination paper is generally normal distributed. Compared with the different professional results

the difference between the clinical medicine and anesthesia majors was significant (P = 0.006). There was no significant difference between clinical medicine and psychology majors (P = 0.129). The difference between anesthesia and psychology was significant (P = 0.001). Conclusion This examination paper has a comprehensive set of assignments

designed basically reasonable

the difficulty is generally small

the distinction is better

the reliability is better

the score distribution is reasonable. The quality of this paper is better and there are some deficiencies in the proposition

It still needs to be improved. Be able to basic get the weak links of different majors

psychological professional students

s fractions lower than other professional students

should try to strengthen the teaching of the course of psychology majors

provide the basis for further improve the teaching level of overall five-year comprehensive class.