目的探讨“微助教”平台在生理学教学中的应用效果。方法选取湖北医药学院2016级康复专科1班(55人)和2班(57人)共计112名学生为研究对象。1班为对照组,2班为实验组,对照组采取传统讲授法进行教学,实验组用“微助教”平台来辅助生理学教学。课程结束时,通过期末考试和问卷调查来评价“微助教”平台在生理学教学中的应用效果,用SPSS17.0对数据进行分析和t检验。结果实验组和对照组期末考试成绩差异具有统计学意义[(81.46 ± 7.63) vs. (68.21 ± 10.27)
t = -7.769
P = 0.000]
其中第四章内容得分[(15.76 ± 1.) vs. (289.34 ± 1.96)
t = -20.595
P = 0.000],第八章内容得分[(8.31 ± 0.86) vs. (6.28 ± 1.22)
t = -10.207
P = 0.000]及第十章内容得分[(15.99 ± 1.14) vs. (11.19 ± 1.81)
t = -16.856
P = 0.000]差异具有统计学差异。实验班问卷调查回收率为100%,结果显示,56人(98.24%)认为“微助教”有助于互动交流,51人(89.47%)认为“微助教”有助于组织课堂纪律,43人(75.43%)认为“微助教”有助于提高学习兴趣,55人(95.26%)认为“微助教”有助于精准解决各重难点知识点。结论“微助教”平台在生理学教学中的应用有助于提高教学效果,值得推广
Abstract
Objective To discuss the application of micro assistant teaching in physiology teaching. Methods A total of 112 students from the rehabilitation class 1 and 2 of grade 2016 in Hubei University of Medicine were selected as the subjects. The class 1 was the control group and class 2 was the experimental group. The control group was adopted the traditional teaching method. The experimental group was adopted micro assistant teaching method for physiology teaching. The effect of micro assistant teaching in physiology teaching was evaluated by final examination and questionnaire. Results Statistical difference was found in average score between experiment group and control group (81.46±7.63 vs. 68.21±10.27) (P=0.000). Questionnaire survey of teaching effect showed that in experimental group 56 students (98.24%) felt it could help to enhance interactive communication
51 students (89.47%) believed it could help to organize the classroom discipline
43 students (75.43%) believed it could increase learning interest
and 55 students (95.26%) believed it could help to accurately solve the various difficult points of knowledge. Conclusion Micro assistant teaching can improve the teaching effect of physiology teaching