医学院校大学生思维风格的差异性研究：以北京中医药大学为例

张怡淳子　谭曦　孔军辉

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

医学院校大学生思维风格的差异性研究：以北京中医药大学为例

请选择... | 更新时间：2024-09-19

- 医学院校大学生思维风格的差异性研究：以北京中医药大学为例
- Differences in thinking styles among medical students： A case study of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2018年17卷第10期
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 北京中医药大学管理学院（张怡淳子
  2. 孔军辉），研究生院（谭曦）
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2018，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张怡淳子　谭曦　孔军辉. 医学院校大学生思维风格的差异性研究：以北京中医药大学为例[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2018,17(10).

Differences in thinking styles among medical students： A case study of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine[J]. 2018,17(10).
张怡淳子　谭曦　孔军辉. 医学院校大学生思维风格的差异性研究：以北京中医药大学为例[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2018,17(10). DOI：

Differences in thinking styles among medical students： A case study of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine[J]. 2018,17(10). DOI：

摘要

目的　以北京中医药大学为例研究医学院校大学生思维风格特点及差异性。方法　运用斯滕伯格思维风格量表（中文版），采用随机整群抽样的方式对120名在校三年级和四年级学生进行调研，运用SPSS 20.0软件对数据进行t检验、方差分析和等级资料秩和检验。结果　医学院校中医、中药、管理专业平等竞争型思维风格得分分别为（4.09±0.67）（3.64±0.50）（3.72±0.56），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；男生、女生立法型思维风格得分分别为（5.14±0.63）（4.90±0.62），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；审判型思维风格得分分别为（4.46±0.56）（4.23±0.62），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；专制型思维风格得分分别为（4.22±0.52）（3.79±0.57），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.001）；全局型思维风格得分分别为（4.36±0.48）（4.00±0.63），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.01）；内倾型思维风格得分分别为（4.48±0.74）（4.18±0.76），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；激进型思维风格得分分别为（4.79±0.71）（4.49±0.68），差异有统计学意义（P ＜0.05）；有父母卫生背景、无父母卫生背景的大学生审判型思维风格得分分别为（3.97±0.64）（4.35±0.59），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；无政府型思维风格得分分别为（4.39±0.32）（4.06±0.50），差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论　医学院校大学生在立法型、审判型、专制型、平等竞争型、无政府型、全局型、内倾型和激进型思维风格上有差异，其思维风格与性别、主修专业、父母背景等存在相关性

Abstract

Objective　To study the differences and the features of thinking styles among undergrad-uates in Beijing University of Chinese Medicine. Methods　The thinking styles of a total of 120 under－graduates of grade 3 and 4 were investigated with Sternberg Thinking Style Scale (Chinese version) by ran－dom cluster sampling. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 20.0) by means of t-test

analysis of variance and rank sum test. Results　The score of oligarchic style in traditional Chinese medicine

traditional Chinese medicine and management students was (4.09±0.67)

(3.64±0.50) and (3.72±0.56) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01). The score of legislative style was (5.14±0.63) in boys and (4.90±0.62) in girls

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The score of judicial style was (4.46±0.56) and (4.23±0.62) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The score of monarchic style was (4.22±0.52) and (3.79±0.57) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.001). The score of global style was (4.36±0.48) and (4.00±0.63) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.01). The score of internal style was (4.48±0.74) and (4.18±0.76) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The score of liberal style was (4.79±0.71) and (4.49±0.68) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The score of judicial style in undergraduates with and without parents engaged in health industry was (3.97±0.64) and (4.35±0.59) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05). The score of anarchic style was (4.39±0.32) and (4.06±0.50) respectively

and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion　Correlated with undergraduate majors

gender and parents' background

Medical students differ in legislative style

judicial style

monarchic style

oligarchic style

anarchic style

global style

internal style and liberal style

which correlates with gender

major and parents' background.

关键词

思维风格　大学生　医学院校

Keywords

Thinking style　Undergraduates　Medical colleges and universities

references

浏览量

461

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

设置本科临床医学专业（重症医学方向）的可行性探讨

中国医学院校“早期接触临床”的研究进展

我国部分院校医学生学习情况问卷调查分析

全国医学院校医患沟通课程教育教学组织状况调查报告

英国医学专业课程设置特点及其启示