临床麻醉学立体化教学模式探索

宋凤香　邓立琴　马妮娜　闵红星　孟尽海

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

临床麻醉学立体化教学模式探索

请选择... | 更新时间：2024-09-19

- 临床麻醉学立体化教学模式探索
- Exploration and practice of three-dimensional teaching mode for clinical anesthesiology
- 中华医学教育探索杂志 2018年17卷第12期
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 宋凤香
  2. 邓立琴
  3. 马妮娜
  4. 闵红星
  5. 孟尽海
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2018，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
宋凤香　邓立琴　马妮娜　闵红星　孟尽海. 临床麻醉学立体化教学模式探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2018,17(12).

Exploration and practice of three-dimensional teaching mode for clinical anesthesiology[J]. 2018,17(12).
宋凤香　邓立琴　马妮娜　闵红星　孟尽海. 临床麻醉学立体化教学模式探索[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2018,17(12). DOI：

Exploration and practice of three-dimensional teaching mode for clinical anesthesiology[J]. 2018,17(12). DOI：

摘要

目的　探讨立体化教学模式在临床麻醉学教学中的应用效果。方法　将宁夏医科大学2010级麻醉学系本科生（1）班43名学生作为对照组，2010级麻醉学系本科生（2）班42名学生作为观察组。对照组在临床麻醉学教学中采用传统教学，观察组则采用立体化教学模式。在临床麻醉学教学结束后比较两组教学效果，主要包括学生的平时成绩（麻醉计划书+麻醉病例分析）和期末成绩。通过教学满意度调查表比较两种教学方法对学生学习兴趣，临床实践能力，探索问题、分析问题和解决问题能力等方面培养的满意度。采用SPSS 17.0软件进行统计分析，学生成绩采用两独立样本t检验；教学效果满意度采用卡方检验。结果　观察组学生的平时成绩和期末成绩均高于对照组[（88.1±5.1）vs.（75.3±4.2），（82.1±3.3） vs. （75.7±3.9）；P<0.05]。与对照组相比，在教学方法激发学习兴趣（60.5% vs. 90.5%），提高自学能力（30.2% vs. 83.3%）和临床实践能力（51.2% vs. 85.7%），拓宽知识面（46.5% vs. 88.1%）和培养创新精神（55.8% vs. 83.3%）等方面；观察组学生表示非常满意的比例更高（P<0.05）。结论　在临床麻醉学教学中，立体化教学教学效果优于传统教学，前者更有利于提高麻醉学系学生的创新实践能力

Abstract

Objective　To explore the application effects of three-dimensional teaching mode for clinical anesthesiology. Methods　43 students were selected into control group

who were from class one

grade 2010 in the Department of Anesthesiology

Ningxia Medical University. 42 students were selected into observation group

who were from class two

grade 2010 in the Department of Anesthesiology

Ningxia Medical University. The traditional teaching mode were used for the students in control group during the teaching of clinical anesthesiology

while three-dimensional teaching mode were used for the students in observation group during the teaching. At the end of teaching

the teaching results were compared between the control group and the observation group

mainly including the usual scores evaluated from an anaesthesia plan plus an anaesthesia case discussion

and the final scores. The teaching satisfaction questionnaire were used to assess the effects of two teaching methods on the students' interest in learning

the capacity of clin-ical practice

the abilities of exploring

analyzing and solving problems

etc. SPSS 17.0 software was used in statistical analysis. The students' teaching results were tested by using two independent samples t-test. The satisfactions of these teaching effects were tested by using the Chi-square test. Results　The usual and final scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group [(88.1±5.1) vs. (75.3±4.2)

(82.1±3.3) vs. (75.7±3.9); P<0.05]. Compared with the control group

the satisfactions of teaching effects in the observation group were higher such as to stimulate interest in learning (60.5% vs. 90.5%)

to improve the abilities of self-study (30.2% vs. 83.3%) and clinical practice (51.2% vs. 85.7%)

to widen the scope of knowledge (46.5% vs. 88.1%) and to cultivate the spirits of innovation (55.8% vs. 83.3%)

etc (P<0.05). Conclusion　During the teaching of clinical anesthesiology

the three-dimensional teaching mode has more advantages than the traditional one

which is good for improving the students' innovation and practice abilities.

关键词

立体化教学　课堂教学　网络教学　实践教学　临床麻醉学

Keywords

Traditional teaching mode　Classroom teaching　Network teaching　Practical teach-ing　Clinical anesthesiology

references

浏览量

207

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

“5+3”医学教育培养模式下医学基础课程的数字化网络教学研究

依托SPOC平台开展医学免疫学翻转课堂教学的研究

临床麻醉学立体化教学模式探索

数理与医学结合的课堂教学探索

TBL结合CBD教学在全科医学概论课程中的应用效果研究