
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
【摘要】目的:观察应用查房单对规范化培训住院医师重症医学科培训过程岗位胜任力的影响。方法:采用前瞻随机对照研究。将2016年4月-2017年1月分不同批次入重症医学科进行规范化培训住院医师,随机分为实验组和对照组,两组均由经验丰富的ICU高年资主治医师按住院医师规范化培训要求一对一带教。对照组常规进行查房和交接班。实验组实行查房单制度,住培医师入科后由带教老师培训查房单应用,查房及交接班时应用查房单,并由带教老师不定期抽检督促查房单应用。每组培训时间均为2个月。根据ICU特点结合岗位胜任力要求制定调查问卷,住培医师培训结束后进行问卷调查,当场回收整理。应用SPSS17.0统计软件对数据进行统计处理。结果:共114人完成全部临床培训和问卷调查。实验组和对照组人员在年龄、性别、教育背景和专业背景方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组规培住院医师在反映实际病人照护能力方面的准确及时有效病史采集(4.61±0.75 vs 4.01±0.92,P=0.000)、全面系统体格检查(4.38±0.86 vs3.98±1.13,P=0.034)、主要临床问题识别(4.46±0.91 vs4.04±1.16,P=0.034)、初步全面诊疗计划制定(4.40±0.86 vs3.91±1.09,P=0.009)、风险评估(4.58±0.75 vs 4.04±0.91,P=0.001)和医学知识掌握(4.42±0.80 vs 3.91±0.91,P=0.002)方面给出更满意评价;在反映制度下临床工作的有效团队沟通合作(4.28±0.90 vs 3.75±1.07
P=0.005)、系统全面重点交接班(4.33±0.89 vs 3.63±1.16,P=0.000);反映从工作中学习与提高的自我反省(4.47±0.85 vs 4.11±0.92
P=0.028)、日常评估工作不断改进质量(4.47±0.85 vs 4.11±0.92
P=0.028)、经反馈改进能力(4.39±0.92 vs 3.56±1.04
P=0.001);反映专业素养方面的团队间专业有效交流(4.35±0.92 vs 3.84±0.94
P=0.004)、在职业行为中展示自信和品质(4.25±0.99 vs 3.74±1.04
P=0.009);反映沟通能力的与患者/家属有效沟通(4.37±0.98 vs 3.71±1.01
P=0.001)、团队成员间有效交流(4.51±0.76 vs 3.93±1.05
P=0.001)、高效完整病历书写(4.30±0.98 vs 3.81±1.01
P=0.01)均给出更满意评价;对教学培训满意度给出更高评价(4.45±0.68 vs 3.82±0.98
P=0.000)。结论:在规范化培训住院医师重症医学科轮转期间实施查房单制度,有助于提高住院医师ICU工作的岗位胜任力和教学满意度。可能与应用查房单有助于住院医师理顺思路,减少遗漏,更多反馈改进,改善交流效率,增加自信有关
Abstract: Objective(Background):Checklists are increasingly utilized in intensive care unit (ICU)patient care
and could served as a multipurpose teaching tool.Butdata are seldom regarding their efficacy in standardized residenttraining(SRT) program. We examined whether checklist usagein critical care medical residenttraining program was associated withbetter training residents competency. Methods:This is a randomized control study.From April2016 to January 2017 the residents entered intensive care unit for SRT program were randomly divided into experimental group and control group.All training schedules were made according to the training program demands and one to one guided by experienced clinical teacher.Checklistwasused in the experimental group during daily rounds and shifting of duty while the control group trained completely through traditional way.Training time was 2 months.The residents’ clinical competency were assessed byquestionair designed by ourselves. Results:Finally 114 residents finished this program. There were no difference in the general conditions in two groups(p>0.05). The experiment group gave higher satisfaction evaluation in all 6 corecompetencies inaddition totechnicalskill: patient care
medical knowledge
systems-based practice.practice-based learningand improvement
professionalism
interpersonal and communication skills.The experiment group also gave a higher satisfaction about training no matter for trainee or trainer. Conclusion:Checklist used by standardized trainingresidents during critical care medicing rotation would be helpful to improve the residents’clinical competency and training satisfaction.It may be related to the effects that checklist helped training residents more rationalized thinking
less missing
more feed-by improvements
more effective communicationand improved diagnosis and treat quality
and then enhance self-confidence ultimately.
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621