目的 探索和优化以临床病理病生治疗学(clinical pathophysiology and therapy,CPPT)为基础的临床病例讨论课的教学内容,提高该课程的教学质量。方法 自编带教教师评价表,对2016至2017学年参加该课程的全体学生进行调查,评价教学满意度及教学特点。比较不同学制的学生或针对不同年资的教师评价结果的差异,分析评价结果与教师资历的相关性。结果 学生对目前该课程整体有较高的评价,但不同学制的学生对启发思维、鼓励发言、引导提问、关注进程和有效反馈等方面的评价,以及掌握程度的自评差异具有统计学意义。针对不同资历的教师,除发言鼓励以外的各方面得分均存在统计学差异,但掌握程度差异无明显统计学意义。Spearman分析显示,得分与教师资历存在一定的相关性。结论 CPPT病例讨论课整体情况值得肯定,但还需要在许多方面继续改进
Abstract
Objective To explore and optimize the teaching content of clinical case discussion course based on clinical pathophysiology and therapy (CPPT)
and to improve the teaching quality of this course. Methods Self-compiled evaluation form was sent to all the students who participated in this course in 2016-2017 school year
and the teaching satisfaction and teaching characteristics were evaluated. The differences of evaluation results from students with different educational programs or teachers with different seniority were compared
and the correlation between evaluation results and teachers' seniority was analyzed. Results The students had a high evaluation on the course
but students from different programs had significant different comments on thinking inspiring
speech encouraging
questions guiding
process holding and effective feedback
as well as the self-evaluation of mastery degree. For teachers with different seniority
there were significant differences in scores in all aspects except speech encouraging
but no differences in mastery degree. Spearman analysis showed that there was a certain correlation between scores and teachers' seniority. Conclusion The overall situation of the CPPT case discussion course in our school is worthy of recognition
but it needs to be improved in many aspects.
关键词
临床病理病生治疗学 病例讨论课 教学评价 分析
Keywords
Clinical pathophysiology and therapy (CPPT) Case discussion course Teaching evaluation Analysis