
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 重庆医科大学附属第二医院
2. 重庆市中医院
纸质出版日期:2024,
网络出版日期:2024-2-1,
扫 描 看 全 文
许珊, 刘风, 杨扬, 等. 超声造影在钝性腹部创伤患者诊断中的应用价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2024,26(1).
The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of patients with blunt abdominal traumaXu Shan1, Yang Yang2, Liu Feng1, Qin Kaixiu1[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2024,26(1).
Purpose: Trauma is the main leading cause of disability and death in young adult population
of which blunt abdominal trauma is one of the most common types of injury
rapid identification of organ injury in blunt abdominal trauma patients is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in adults with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods: Patients with blunt abdominal trauma attending the emergency department of the Second Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from 2020.10 to 2023.2 were included in this study
general demographic and injuries procedure were collected
organ injuries were assessed by comparing the results of enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and CEUS with American Association for Trauma Surgery standards. The sensitivity
specificity
positive predictive value
negative predictive value and accuracy of CEUS were calculated by drawing cross-tabulations using CECT as a standard.The diagnostic performance between CEUS and CECT were compared by McNemar-Bowke test. The diagnostic consistency between CEUS and CECT was analyzed by kappa consistency test
the cost differences were compared by rank sum test
and the adverse reactions of CEUS were reported. Results: A total of 42 patients with blunt abdominal trauma were included
predominantly male patients. 30 injury patients were found by CECT and 29 injury patients were found by CEUS
and the sensitivity of CEUS was found to be 93.33%
specificity 91.67%
positive predictive value 96.55%
negative predictive value 84.62%
and diagnostic accuracy 92.86%
respectively. McNemar-Bowke test showed that there was no statistical difference in diagnostic performance between CEUS and CECT (χ2=1
P=0.317). Kappa consistency test found that its Kappa value was 0.966. No adverse events were observed and the single time cost was significantly lower than that of CECT (¥806 vs. ¥1657
P=0.000). Conclusion: CEUS is a safe
effective
convenient
low-cost
and radiation-free imaging method that can be used as an effective alternative method to CECT in blunt abdominal trauma patients.
钝性腹部创伤 CEUS CECT 诊断价值
0
浏览量
177
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621