LIU Hang, et al. Comparison of different ways of pulling out ureter double-J stent in females[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2008,(8):1013-1015.
LIU Hang, et al. Comparison of different ways of pulling out ureter double-J stent in females[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2008,(8):1013-1015.DOI：
Objective:To compare the different ways of pulling out ureter double-J stent in females.Methods:172 female patients requiring urter double-J stent for different cases were chosen
including upper urinary calculus(150 cases)
hydronephrosis with urterostenosis(14 cases)
Ormond’s syndrome(3 cases) and postradiotherapy of uterine cervix cancer(5 cases).These cases were divided into three groups with different ways of pulling out the urter double-J stent.Results:The achievement ratio of cystoscope(100%) and rat-tooth forceps(98.1%) were higher than the blood vessel forceps(92.1%).Conclusion:The cystoscope operation requires the special equipment and cost more money and time.Compared to the blood vessel forceps
using the rat-tooth forceps to pull out the female ureter double-J stent is safe and more effective.
关键词
双J管膀胱镜血管钳鼠齿钳取管
Keywords
Double-J stentCystoscopeRat-tooth forcepsBlood vessel forcepsPull out
京公网安备11010802024621