Objective:To compare the clinical therapeutic effect between Focused Ultrasound and microwave treatment to PAR and to investigate the advantages of the former. Method:219 cases of PAR patients randomized

143 were treated with CZB-therapeutic apparatus rhinitis treatment

76 cases in the control group using microwave therapy apparatus treatment. The therapeutic effect was evaluated by clinical symptoms controlled counting-scores

according to the Chinese Lan Zhou principle of treatment and recommendation program for allergic rhinitis (2004). Result:A total of follow-up after 12 months

with a total effective rate are as follows:1 month:97.9% in the treatment group and control group

94.7%(P > 0.05);6 month:89.5% in the treatment group and control group

85.5%(P > 0.05);12 month:81.1% in the treatment group and control group

68.4%(P<0.05). Conclusion:Focused Ultrasound treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis

a more lasting effect

pay attention to the protection of physiological function of the nasal cavity

safe

after light reaction and rapid recovery

is a worthwhile promotion of physical therapy.