
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院流行病教研室
2. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院感染科
纸质出版日期:2011,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]文静,唐晓君,钟朝晖,李君,刘晨煜,李革,秦波.重庆市成年男性工人包皮环切知识干预效果的评价[J].重庆医科大学学报,2011,36(12):1500-1503.
WEN Jing1, TANG Xiao-jun1, ZHONG Zhao-hui1, et al. Evaluation of intervention measures about the knowledge of circumcision among adult male workers in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2011,36(12):1500-1503.
[1]文静,唐晓君,钟朝晖,李君,刘晨煜,李革,秦波.重庆市成年男性工人包皮环切知识干预效果的评价[J].重庆医科大学学报,2011,36(12):1500-1503. DOI:
WEN Jing1, TANG Xiao-jun1, ZHONG Zhao-hui1, et al. Evaluation of intervention measures about the knowledge of circumcision among adult male workers in Chongqing[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2011,36(12):1500-1503. DOI:
目的:筛选出适合重庆地区该人群包皮环切的推广方式
以达到有效降低人类免疫缺陷病毒(Human immunodefi-ciency virus
HIV)新发感染率
并提高生殖健康。方法:随机抽取4家工厂
分为3个干预组
分别为普通干预组、特殊干预组1、特殊干预组2
3组分别给予3次、2次、1次干预
并在每次干预后1个月内进行干预效果的评价。结果:各种干预方式干预前后包皮环切术知识知晓率均有所提高
干预前后的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);复合干预方式2的知晓率均高于复合干预方式1、复合干预方式3以及单一干预方式1
并且之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);经趋势卡方检验
普通干预组、特殊干预组1包皮环切知识知晓率的差异均有统计学意义(普通干预组:χ2趋势=9.362
P<0.05;特殊干预组1:χ2趋势=22.476
P<0.001);最喜欢的宣传方式是音像材料
最感兴趣的宣传内容是包皮环切与艾滋病预防的关系。结论:普通干预组较其它两干预组最后知晓率的上升幅度高
达20.81%
复合干预方式2为最好的干预方式;包皮环切与艾滋病(Acquired immure deficiency syndrome
AIDS)的相关知识是主要宣传内容;多种强化相结合的宣教方式是有效的干预方式。
Objective:To screen the way of promoting the circumcision in Chongqing
to achieve to reduce human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) infections effectively
and to improve the reproductive health.Methods: The subjects collected by randomized control were divided into 3 groups:ordinary intervention group
special intervention group 1
and special intervention group 2.The groups were intervened by 3 times
2 times
and 1 time
respectively
and the results were evaluated within a month after every intervention.Results: The level of circumcision knowledge after every intervention was improved and had statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The awareness rate of composite intervention 2 was higher than that of composite intervention 1
composite intervention 3 and single intervention 1
which had statistically significant difference(P<0.05).The awareness rate of ordinary intervention group and special intervention group 1 had statistically significant difference(P<0.05) by the Chi-square trend(ordinary intervention group: χ2trend=9.362
P<0.05;special intervention group 1: χ2trend=22.476
P<0.001).The favorite was acoustical materials and those concerning the relationship between circumcision and HIV.Conclusion: There is a much larger ascending range of the awareness rate in the ordinary intervention group than in the other two intervention groups
which is 20.81%.The composite intervention 2 is the best way of intervention.The knowledge about the circumcision and the acquired immure deficiency syndrome is the main publicized content.Integrated health education and publicity is an effective way of intervention.
包皮环切术干预方式知晓率人类免疫缺陷病毒
circumcisionway of interventionawareness ratehuman immunodeficiency virus(HIV)
0
浏览量
35
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621