股动脉穿刺后Angioseal血管闭合器与人工压迫止血的并发症研究

方志敏; 钟小兰

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

股动脉穿刺后Angioseal血管闭合器与人工压迫止血的并发症研究

更新时间：2023-12-18

- 股动脉穿刺后Angioseal血管闭合器与人工压迫止血的并发症研究
- Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention
- 重庆医科大学学报 2012年37卷第9期页码：836-837
- 作者机构：
  
  新疆医科大学第二附属医院心内科,乌鲁木齐,830063
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版日期：2012，
扫描看全文
方志敏, 钟小兰. 股动脉穿刺后Angioseal血管闭合器与人工压迫止血的并发症研究[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2012,37(9):836-837.

FANG Zhimin, ZHONG Xiaolan. Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2012,37(9):836-837.
方志敏, 钟小兰. 股动脉穿刺后Angioseal血管闭合器与人工压迫止血的并发症研究[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2012,37(9):836-837. DOI：

FANG Zhimin, ZHONG Xiaolan. Complications of applying Angioseal arterial closure device versus and manual compression homeostasis after common femoral artery puncture in coronary intervention[J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University, 2012,37(9):836-837. DOI：

摘要

目的：比较经股动脉穿刺行冠状动脉介入诊治术后Angioseal血管闭合器和人工压迫止血的安全性。方法：采用随机双盲对照研究，从2008年1月至2011年11月经股动脉穿刺行冠状动脉介入诊治的病例611人次，分为Angioseal血管闭合器组和人工压迫组，比较2组并发症的发生率。结果：２组总的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P >0.05），但在24 h后Angioseal血管闭合器组的并发症发生率有增加的趋势（P<0.05）。结论：使用Angioseal血管闭合器不能减少股动脉穿刺并发症的发生率，尤其在24 h后并发症有增加的趋势，不推荐股动脉穿刺后常规使用Angioseal血管闭合器。

Abstract

Objective：To compare the safety between Angioseal closure device and manual compression homeostasis after performing coronary intervention through femoral artery puncture. Methods：Randomized double blind controlled trial was used. Totally 611 pa－tients treated with coronary intervention through femoral artery puncture from January 2008 to November 2011 were enrolled and di－vided into Angioseal closure device group and manual compression homeostasis group. Complications were compared between the two groups. Results：There was no difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups（P >0.05）. However，the compli－cation rate of Angioseal closure device group tended to increase at 24 h after the treatment（P<0.05）. Conclusions：Angioseal clo－sure device can not decrease complications because delayed complications may occur significantly after 24 h. Angioseal closure de－vice is not recommended to use after performing coronary intervention through femoral artery puncture.

关键词

冠状动脉造影冠状动脉介入血管闭合器人工压迫

Keywords

coronary angiographycoronary interventionarterial closure devicesmanual compression

references

浏览量

844

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同血管病变冠心病患者自主神经活性研究

血清尿酸、C-反应蛋白与冠状动脉病变

冠心病患者脉搏波速度特点研究

探讨高血压合并冠心病脉搏波速度变化特点

女性胸痛患者危险因素及无创检查的临床意义