
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 山西医科大学医学影像学院
2. 山西医科大学第一医院
3. 山西省肿瘤医院
4. 山西省儿童医院
纸质出版日期:2022,
网络出版日期:2022-8-1,
扫 描 看 全 文
沈倩倩, 陈武, 刘晓芳, 等. 剪切波弹性成像和超声造影联合评分鉴别不同大小BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块良恶性的临床价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2022,24(7):521-526.
The diagnostic performance of scoring by shear wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound with respect to differentiating benign and malignant in BI-RADS 4 breast nodules with different sizes[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2022,24(7):521-526.
沈倩倩, 陈武, 刘晓芳, 等. 剪切波弹性成像和超声造影联合评分鉴别不同大小BI-RADS 4类乳腺肿块良恶性的临床价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2022,24(7):521-526. DOI:
The diagnostic performance of scoring by shear wave elastography combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound with respect to differentiating benign and malignant in BI-RADS 4 breast nodules with different sizes[J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine, 2022,24(7):521-526. DOI:
目的:探讨剪切波弹性成像(shear wave elastography,SWE)和超声造影(contrast enhanced ultrasound,CEUS)联合评分对不同大小BI-RADS 4 类乳腺肿块良恶性的诊断价值。方法:收集2020年8月—2021年10月在山西医科大学第一医院超声科就诊的158例患者(共167个肿块)常规超声诊断为BI-RADS 4 类的乳腺肿块,分为大肿块组(>20mm)和小肿块组(≤20mm),均进行SWE和CEUS检查,并分别对每个肿块进行SWE、CEUS单独和联合赋值评分,以病理结果为金标准,构建受试者工作特征曲线(Receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)评价SWE、CEUS单独及联合评分对两组肿块良恶性的诊断效能。结果:大肿块组SWE/CEUS单独评分的AUC分别为0.786/0.820,诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值(Positive predictive value,PPV)和阴性预测值(Negative predictive value,NPV)分别为:79.5%/81.8%、68.7%/75.0%、76.3%/78.9%、79.5%/81.8%和71.9%/75.0%;SWE单独评分与CEUS单独评分的比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.537,P>0.05);大肿块组联合评分临界值为6.5分时,AUC为0.885,95%置信区间(Confidence interval,CI)为0.791-0.947,诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、PPV和NPV分别为88.6%、87.5%、88.2%、88.6%和84.8%,均高于单独评分法,且差异均有统计学意义(Z=2.153、2.287,P均<0.05)。小肿块组SWE/CEUS单独评分的AUC分别为0.730/0.778,其诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、PPV和NPV分别为61.0%/70.7%、68.0%/70.0%、64.8%/69.2%、61.0%/65.1%和68.0%/72.9%;SWE单独评分与CEUS单独评分的比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.688,P>0.05);小肿块组联合评分临界值为5.5分时,AUC为0.868,95%CI为0.781-0.930,诊断敏感性、特异性、准确性、PPV和NPV分别为:87.8%、84.0%、86.8%、83.7%和89.6%,均高于单独评分法,且差异均有统计学意义(Z=3.040、2.746,P均<0.05)。结论:SWE和CEUS联合评分对不同大小BI-RADS 4 类乳腺肿块良恶性的鉴别具有较高的诊断价值,特别是对于小肿块,适当降低诊断临界值,可明显提高诊断准确性,减少不必要的穿刺活检。
Objective: To explore the value of the diagnostic performance of scoring by shear wave elastography (SWE) combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with respect to differentiating benign and malignant in BI-RADS 4 breast nodules with different sizes. Methods: From August 2020 to October 2021
a total of 167 BI-RADS 4 breast nodules in 158 patients were collected from the First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University were divided into large size group (>20 mm) and small size group (≤20 mm)
Both SWE and CEUS were performed
SWE and CEUS scoring alone and combined scoring were built in each nodule. The pathological finings were utilized as the gold standard
receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the separate scoring and combined scoring for discrimination between benign and malignant breast lesions. Results: In large size group
area under the ROC curve(AUC) of SWE/CEUS scoring alone was was 0.786/0.820
and the diagnostic sensitivity
specificity
accuracy
positive predictive value (PPV) and Negative predictive value (NPV) were 79.5%/81.8%
68.7%/75.0%
76.3%/78.9%
79.5%/81.8% and 71.9%/75.0%
respectively; There was no significant difference between the SWE alone score and the CEUS alone score (Z=0.537
P>0.05). when the cut-off value of combined scoring was 6.5 points
the AUC was 0.885
95% confidence interval (CI) was 0.791 to 0.947
and the sensitivity
specificity
accuracy
PPV and NPV were 88.6%
87.5%
88.2%
88.6% and 84.8%
respectively
which were higher than scoring alone
and the differences had statistical significance (Z=2.153/2.287
P<0.05) . In small size group
the AUC of SWE/CEUS scoring alone was 0.730/0.778
and the diagnostic sensitivity
specificity
accuracy
PPV and NPV were 61.0%/70.7%
68.0%/70.0%
64.8%/69.2%
61.0%/65.1% and 68.0%/72.9%
respectively; There was no significant difference between the SWE alone score and the CEUS alone score (Z=0.688
P>0.05). when cut-off value of the combined scoring was 5.5 points
the AUC was 0.868
95% CI was 0.781 to 0.930
and the diagnostic sensitivity
specificity
accuracy
PPV and NPV were 87.8%
84.0%
86.8%
83.7% and 89.6%
respectively
which were higher than scoring alone
and the differences had statistical significance (Z=3.040/2.746
P<0.05). Conclusion: Scoring by SWE combined with CEUS has a high diagnostic value for differentiating benign from malignant BI-RADS 4 breast nodules of different sizes
especially for small nodules
which the diagnostic cut-off point should be appropriately reduced
can effectively reduce unnecessary preoperative biopsies to some extent and improve diagnostic accuracy.
剪切波弹性成像超声造影乳腺肿块联合评分
Shear wave elastographyContrast-enhanced ultrasoundBreast nodulesCombined scoring
0
浏览量
221
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621