
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
淮滨县人民医院重症医学科
纸质出版日期:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
王荣, 丁莉莉. 细致化护理对重症高血压脑出血患者日常生活活动能力及神经功能的影响[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(2):97-100.
Wang Rong, Ding Lili. The e ffect of detailed care model on activities of daily living and neurological functions in patients with severe hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(2):97-100.
王荣, 丁莉莉. 细致化护理对重症高血压脑出血患者日常生活活动能力及神经功能的影响[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(2):97-100. DOI:
Wang Rong, Ding Lili. The e ffect of detailed care model on activities of daily living and neurological functions in patients with severe hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(2):97-100. DOI:
目的探讨细致化护理对重症高血压脑出血患者日常生活活动能力、神经功能的影响。方法选取2017年8月—2020年12月信阳市某医院收治的96例重症高血压脑出血患者为研究对象
按照治疗时间分为对照组和观察组
对照组51例
观察组45例。对照组患者给予常规护理干预
观察组患者在对照组患者基础上给予细致化护理干预
2组患者均持续护理10 d。比较2组患者的住院时间、并发症发生情况及护理满意度
比较2组患者护理前及护理后5 d、10 d时的日常生活活动能力(ADL)、简式Fugl-Meyer评估量表(FMA)以及美国国立研究院制定的卒中量表(NIHSS)评分。结果观察组患者住院时间短于对照组
院内感染及压疮发生率也均低于对照组(2.22%vs 13.73%
2.22%vs 15.69%)
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理前
2组患者ADL及FMA评分比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理5 d时
2组患者ADL及FMA评分均高于护理前
且观察组高于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理10 d时
2组患者ADL及FMA评分均高于护理前
且观察组高于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)
此外观察组患者ADL及FMA评分均高于护理5 d时
对照组患者FMA评分高于护理5 d时
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理前
2组患者NIHSS评分比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理5 d时
2组患者NIHSS评分均低于护理前
且观察组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理10 d时
2组患者NIHSS评分均低于护理前
且观察组低于对照组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)
此外2组患者NIHSS评分均低于护理5 d时
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者的护理总满意度为95.56%
高于对照组患者的82.35%
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论细致化护理干预可提高高血压脑出血患者预后质量
改善日常生活活动能力及神经功能
且患者满意度也较高
值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective To explore the effect of detailed care model on activities of daily living(ADL) and neurological functions in patients with severe hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage. Methods Ninety-six patients with severe hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage who were treated in a hospital in Xinyang City from August 2017 to December 2020 were selected as study subjects and divided into a control group and an observation group according to the treatment time
with 51 cases in the control group and 45 cases in the observation group. The patients in the control group were given conventional nursing interventions and the patients in the observation group were given detailed nursing interventions on the basis of the patients in the control group
and the patients in both groups were nursed for 10 d. The length of stay
complications and nursing satisfaction of the patients in the two groups were compared
and the ADL
simple Fugl-Meyer assessment(FMA)
and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) scores of the patients in the two groups were compared before and 5 d and 10 d after nursing. Results The patients in the observation group had a shorter hospital stay than the control group
and the incidence of nosocomial infections and pressure sores were also lower than those in the control group(2.22% vs. 13.73%and 2.22% vs. 15.69%)
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). Before nursing care
the differences in ADL and FMA scores between the two groups were not statistically significant(P>0.05); at 5 d of nursing care
the ADL and FMA scores of patients in both groups were higher than before nursing care and higher in the observation group than in the control group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05); at 10 d of nursing care
the ADL and FMA scores of patients in both groups were higher than before nursing care and higher in the observation group than in the control group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). In addition
the ADL and FMA scores of patients in the observation group were higher than those at 5 d of care
and the FMA scores of patients in the control group were higher than those at 5 d of care
and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Before nursing care
the differences were not statistically significant(P>0.05) when comparing the NIHSS scores between the two groups; at 5 d of nursing care
the NIHSS scores of patients in both groups were lower than before nursing care and lower in the observation group than in the control group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05); at 10 d of nursing care
the NIHSS scores of patients in both groups were lower than before nursing care and lower in the observation group than in the control group
with statistically significant differences(P <0.05). In addition
the NIHSS scores of patients in both groups were lower than those at 5 d of care
and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The total satisfaction rate of patients in the observation group was 95.56%
which was higher than that of patients in the control group(82.35%)
and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The detailed nursing intervention can improve the prognostic quality
activities of daily living and neurological functions of patients with hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage
and the patient satisfaction is also higher
which is worth promotion in clinical use.
细致化护理干预重症高血压脑出血围手术期干预满意度
Detailed nursing interventionSevere hypertensive cerebral hemorrhagePerioperative periodNursing satisfaction
0
浏览量
111
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621