
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
开封市人民医院药剂科
纸质出版日期:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
周宏伟, 罗秀英. 新活素联合左西孟旦治疗急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克的临床疗效研究[J]. 保健医学研究与实践, 2022,19(2):9-14.
Zhou Hongwei, Luo Xiuying. Clinical effects of rh BNP combined with levosimendan on acute myocardial infarction combined with cardiogenic shock[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2022,19(2):9-14.
目的探讨新活素联合左西孟旦治疗对急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心源性休克(CS)患者的临床疗效
以及心泵功能
脉搏指数连续心排量监测技术(PICCO)血流动力学指标
心肌功能
血清血管加压素(AVP)、血管紧张素Ⅱ(AngⅡ)水平的影响。方法选取2017年1月—2020年1月开封市某医院收治的AMI合并CS患者177例为研究对象
按照不同治疗方案分为对照组、研究组和综合组
各59例。对照组患者采用新活素治疗
研究组患者采用左西孟旦治疗
综合组患者采用新活素联合左西孟旦治疗
3组患者均持续治疗7 d。比较3组患者的治疗效果
比较3组患者治疗前、治疗3 d时及治疗7 d时的心泵功能[心搏量(SV)、左室射血分数(LVEF)、心脏指数(CI)]
PICCO血流动力学指标[中心静脉压(CVP)、体循环阻力指数(SVRI)、肺毛细血管楔嵌压(PCWP)]
心肌功能[血清心肌肌钙蛋白I(c TnI)、肌酸激酶同工酶(CK-MB)、室壁运动计分指数(WMSI)、纵向收缩期峰值应变率(SRs)]及血清AVP、AngⅡ水平
比较3组患者随访6个月时的不良心脏事件(MACE)发生情况。结果综合组患者的治疗总有效率为93.22%
高于对照组的79.66%和研究组的76.27%
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前
3组患者SV、LVEF、CI及WMSI、SRs水平比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d及治疗7 d时
3组患者SV、LVEF、CI及SRs水平均高于治疗前且综合组高于对照组和研究组
WMSI水平均低于治疗前且综合组低于对照组和研究组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前
3组患者CVP、SVRI及PCWP比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d及治疗7 d时
3组患者CVP、SVRI及PCWP均低于治疗前
且综合组低于对照组和研究组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前
3组患者血清c TnI、CK-MB水平比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d及治疗7 d时
3组患者血清cTnI、CK-MB水平均低于治疗前
且综合组低于对照组和研究组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前
3组患者血清AVP、AngⅡ水平比较
差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗3 d及治疗7 d时
3组患者血清AVP、AngⅡ水平均低于治疗前
且综合组低于对照组和研究组
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访6个月时
综合组患者MACE发生率为6.78%
低于对照组的20.34%和研究组的23.73%
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论新活素联合左西孟旦治疗AMI合并CS疗效显著
可明显改善患者的心功能
降低PICCO血流动力学指标和血清AVP、AngⅡ水平
且MACE发生率也较低
值得在临床上推广使用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of rh BNP combined with levosimendan on patients with acute myocardial infarction(AMI) combined with cardiogenic shock(CS)
and the effects on the patients’ cardiac pump function
pulse-indicated continuous cardiac output(PICCO) hemodynamic indexes
myocardial function
and serum arginine-vasopressin(AVP) and angiotensin Ⅱ(AngⅡ) levels. Methods One hundred and seventyseven patients with AMI combined with CS admitted to a hospital in Kaifeng from January 2017 to January 2020 were selected for the study and divided into a control group
a study group and a combined group according to different treatment protocols
59 cases each. Patients in the control group were treated with rh BNP
patients in the study group were treated with levosimendan
and patients in the combined group were treated with rh BNP combined with levosimendan
all for 7 d. The treatment effects of the three groups were compared
and patients in the three groups were compared in terms of cardiac pumping function [stroke volume(SV)
left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)
cardiac index(CI)]
PICCO hemodynamic parameters [central venous pressure(CVP)
systemic vascular resistance index(SVRI)
pulmonary capillary wedge pressure(PCWP)]
myocardial function [serum cardiac troponin I(cTnI)
creatine kinase myocardial band(CK-MB)
wall motion score index(WMSI)
longitudinal peak systolic strain rates(SRs)] and serum AVP and AngⅡ levels before treatment
at 3 d and at 7 d. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events(MACE) in the three groups were compared at 6 months of follow-up. Results The total treatment efficacy of patients in the combined group was 93.22%
which was higher than that of the control group(79.66%) and the study group(76.27%)
and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Before treatment
there were no statistically significant differences in SV
LVEF
CI
WMSI and SRs among the 3 groups(P>0.05); at 3 d and 7 d of treatment
SV
LVEF
CI
WMSI and SRs of the 3 groups were higher than before treatment
and the combined group had higher figures than the control group and the study group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05); the levels of WMSI were lower than before treatment
and the figures for the combined group was lower than those for the control group and the study group
with statistically significant differences(P <0.05). Before treatment
the differences in CVP
SVRI and PCWP were not statistically significant(P>0.05); at 3 d and 7 d of treatment
CVP
SVRI and PCWP were lower than before treatment in all three groups
and the combined group had lower figures than the control group and the study group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05). Before treatment
there was no statistically significant difference in the levels of serum c TnI
CK-MB among the three groups; at 3 d and 7 d of treatment
the levels of serum c TnI
CK-MB and WMSI in the three groups were lower than before treatment
and the combined group had lower figures than the control group and the study group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).Before treatment
there was no statistically significant difference in the levels of serum AVP and AngⅡ among the three groups(P>0.05); at 3 d and 7 d of treatment
the levels of serum AVP and AngⅡ in the three groups were lower than before treatment
and the combined group had lower figures than the control group and the study group
with statistically significant differences(P<0.05).At the 6-month follow-up
the incidence of MACE was 6.78% in the combined group
which was lower than that of 20.34% in the control group and 23.73% in the study group
and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Treating AMI combined with CS with the combination therapy of rh BNP and levosimendan is effective and can significantly improve the pump function and myocardial function of patients
reduce the PICCO hemodynamic index and serum AVP and AngⅡ levels
while also lowering the incidence of MACE
and it is worth promoting in clinical use.
急性心肌梗死伴心源性休克新活素左西孟旦心功能血流动力学血管加压素血管紧张素Ⅱ
Acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shockrhBNPLevosimendanCardiac pump functionHemodynamicsVasopressinAngiotensin Ⅱ
0
浏览量
140
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621