
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
沈阳师范大学教育科学学院
纸质出版日期:2017,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]张野,张珊珊,董韵迪.群体认同在群际威胁与内隐城乡刻板印象间的调节作用[J].保健医学研究与实践,2017,14(05):13-17.
Zhang Ye, Zhang Shanshan, Dong Yundi. The regulatory effect of group identity on the relationship between intergroup threat and implicit urban-rural stereotype[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2017,14(5):13-17.
[1]张野,张珊珊,董韵迪.群体认同在群际威胁与内隐城乡刻板印象间的调节作用[J].保健医学研究与实践,2017,14(05):13-17. DOI:
Zhang Ye, Zhang Shanshan, Dong Yundi. The regulatory effect of group identity on the relationship between intergroup threat and implicit urban-rural stereotype[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2017,14(5):13-17. DOI:
目的探讨群体认同在群际威胁和内隐城乡刻板印象间的调节作用。方法选取沈阳某高校122名自愿参与本研究的城市籍大学生作为被试
采用随机数字表法将其分为4个实验组:一般群体认同凸显-高群际威胁组(30人)、一般群体认同凸显-低群际威胁组(31人)、特定群体认同凸显-高群际威胁组(31人)及特定群体认同凸显-低群际威胁组(30人)
分别完成每组对应的群体认同凸显任务、群体认同凸显强化任务及群际威胁操纵任务
而后对所有被试进行内隐刻板印象内隐联结测验(IAT)
比较4组被试的内隐城乡刻板印象得分。结果特定群体认同凸显-低群际威胁组被试内隐城乡刻板印象得分为0.737±0.331
特定群体认同凸显-高群际威胁组被试得分为0.755±0.306
一般群体认同凸显-低群际威胁组被试得分为0.471±0.245
一般群体认同凸显-高群际威胁组被试得分为0.733±0.332。其中特定群体认同凸显-高群际威胁组被试得分高于特定群体认同凸显-低群际威胁组
但差异并无统计学意义(P>0.05)
而一般群体认同凸显-高群际威胁组被试得分高于一般群体认同凸显-低群际威胁组
且差异具有统计学意义(t=3.568
P<0.05)。将内隐城乡刻板印象作为因变量
通过方差分析探讨群际威胁和群体认同2个因素的影响
发现群际威胁的主效应显著[F(1
118)=6.445
P<0.05]
群体认同的主效应显著[F(1
118)=6.754
P<0.05]
二者的交互作用亦显著[F(1
118)=4.859
P<0.05]。结论群际威胁可增强个体的内隐城乡刻板印象
且群体认同在群际威胁与内隐城乡刻板印象间具有调节作用。
Objective To investigate the regulatory effect of group identity on the relationship between intergroup threat and implicit urban-rural stereotype.Methods A total of 122 urban students from a Shenyang university voluntarily participated in this study.Using a random number table
all participants were divided into 4 groups:high general group identity-high intergroup threat(group 1
n=30)
high general group identity-low intergroup threat(group 2
n=31)
high specific group identity-high intergroup threat(group 3
n=31)
and high specific group identity-low intergroup threat(group 4
n=30).Participants were asked to complete their corresponding group identity highlighting task
strengthened group identity highlighting task
and intergroup threat manipulation task.And then
all participants received Implicit Association Test(IAT).The implicit urban-rural stereotype scores were compared among the 4 groups.Results The mean implicit urban-rural stereotype scores of group 1
2
3
and 4 were 0.733±0.332
0.471±0.245
0.755±0.306
and 0.737±0.331
respectively.The mean score of group 3 was slightly higher than that of group 4
but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The mean score of group 1 was much higher than that of group 2
and the difference was statistically significant(t=3.568
P<0.05).Using implicit urban-rural stereotype score as the dependent variable
analysis of variance revealed that the main effect of intergroup threat was significant[F(1
118)=6.445
P<0.05]
the main effect of group identity was significant[F(1
118)=6.754
P<0.05]
and their interaction was also significant[F(1
118)=4.859
P<0.05].Conclusion Intergroup threat may increase an individual′s implicit urban-rural stereotype
and group identity has a regulatory effect on the relationship between intergroup threat and implicit urban-rural stereotype.
群际威胁内隐刻板城乡刻板群体认同
Intergroup threatImplicit stereotypeUrban-rural stereotypeGroup identity
0
浏览量
181
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621