
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院
2. 重庆医科大学医学与社会发展研究中心
3. 重庆医科大学健康领域社会风险预测治理协同创新中心
4. 重庆市健康教育所
纸质出版日期:2016,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]罗新苗,张娜,吴成斌,曾缓,罗明宇,白杨,赵勇.重庆市“送烟=送危害”主题公益广告效果评价[J].保健医学研究与实践,2016,13(06):18-21+51.
Luo Xinmiao, Zhang Na, Wu Chengbin, et al. Outcome Evaluation of the Public Service Advertising with the Theme of " Cigarette as A Gift=Harmful Intention" in Chongqing[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2016,13(6):18-21.
[1]罗新苗,张娜,吴成斌,曾缓,罗明宇,白杨,赵勇.重庆市“送烟=送危害”主题公益广告效果评价[J].保健医学研究与实践,2016,13(06):18-21+51. DOI:
Luo Xinmiao, Zhang Na, Wu Chengbin, et al. Outcome Evaluation of the Public Service Advertising with the Theme of " Cigarette as A Gift=Harmful Intention" in Chongqing[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2016,13(6):18-21. DOI:
目的评价"送烟=送危害"主题公益广告的控烟干预效果
为今后控烟工作的开展提供科学依据。方法采用方便抽样法
在调查地点对目标人群进行问卷调查。在"送烟=送危害"主题公益广告宣传前及宣传后对目标人群均进行1次问卷调查
且2次调查的地点一致。结果广告宣传前调查对象认为吸烟有害健康的人数比例低于广告宣传后
但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);认为吸烟的危害在平时生活中被夸大的人数比例在广告宣传前高于广告宣传后
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同意及非常同意"烟草制品是送人的好礼物"的调查对象人数比例分别由广告宣传前的20.10%及2.03%降至广告宣传后的13.44%及0.58%
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与过去的30d比较
调查对象中吸烟者吸烟量更多的人数比例由广告宣传前的16.55%降至广告宣传后的10.40%
差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。广告宣传后
有57.14%的吸烟者认为该广告增加了他们戒烟的可能性
且调查对象的吸烟率由广告宣传前的41.22%降至40.75%
但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。调查对象中"非常有可能"及"极其有可能"把烟草制品当作礼物送人的人数比例由广告宣传前的12.16%及12.33%下降至广告宣传后的7.23%及3.32%
差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过"送烟=送危害"主题公益广告进行控烟宣教具有一定效果
但我国控烟工作仍任重道远
迫切需要探索更有效的综合控烟措施。
Objective To evaluate the anti-smoking intervention effect of the public service advertising with the theme of "cigarette as a gift=harmful intention"
so as to provide scientific evidence for future anti-smoking initiatives.Methods By convenience sampling
aquestionnaire survey was conducted in the target population at a designated site.The survey was performed both before and after the launch of the public service advertising with the theme of "cigarette as a gift=harmful intention"
at the same place.Results The proportion of respondents who agreed that "smoking is bad for health" was lower before the advertising initiative than that after advertising
but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).However
the proportion of respondents who thought that "the harms of smoking are being overestimated in our daily life" was significantly higher before advertising than that after advertising(P<0.05).The proportion of respondents who agreed or highly agreed that "cigarette is a very good gift" was significantly decreased from 20.10% and 2.03% before advertising to 13.44% and 0.58% after advertising
respectively(both P<0.05).The proportion of respondents who reported " heavier smoking within the past 30days" was significantly reduced from 16.55% before advertising to 10.40% after advertising(P<0.05).Moreover
57.14% of smokers reported that the advertising increased their likelihood of giving up smoking;the smoking rate was decreased from 41.22%to 40.75%
but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The proportion of respondents who reported " very likely or extremely likely to present cigarette as a gift" was significantly decreased from 12.16% and 12.33%before advertising to 7.23% and 3.32% after advertising
respectively(both P <0.05).Conclusion Antismoking intervention via the public service advertising with the theme of "cigarette as a gift=harmful intention" has favorable outcomes.Facing the challenges ahead
however
it is imperative to develop more comprehensive and effective anti-smoking measures to benefit more people.
控烟送烟广告效果评价
Anti-smokingCigarette as a giftAdvertisingOutcome evaluation
0
浏览量
114
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621