
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
上海东华大学医院 上海200051
纸质出版日期:2006,
扫 描 看 全 文
[1]王挥宇.AP复合体修复前牙切角缺损的临床研究[J].高校保健医学研究与实践,2006(01):33-34.
WANG Hui-yu. Clinical Study on Restoration of Incisal Corner Defect of Anterior Tooth with AP Compomer[J]. Health Medicine Research and Practice, 2006,(1):33-34.
目的比较两种粘结剂对AP复合体直接修复前牙切角缺损时固位情况
为临床工作提供参考。方法随机选择前牙切角缺损患者53名
计患牙80颗
分为A、B两组。A组采用Prime&BondNTTM
B组采用自酸蚀粘结剂AdperTMPromptTM
两组均用AP复合体直接修复
术后3月、6月、1年复诊
观察充填物的留存情况。结果术后3月
A、B两组脱落率分别为7·5%、5·0%
差异无统计学意义(p>0·05);术后6月
A、B两组脱落率分别为17·5%、12·5%
差异无统计学意义(p>0·05);术后1年
A、B两组脱落率分别为27·5%、17·5%
A组充填物脱落率高于B组
差异有统计学意义(p<0·05)。结论AP复合体修复前牙切角缺损具有一定疗效
采用自酸蚀粘结剂有助于提高AP复合体直接修复前牙切角缺损时的固位力。
Objective To compare the retention of the restorations of AP compomer used to restore the incisal corner defect directly with two different adhesives. Method 80 anterior teeth with incisal corner defect from 53 patients were divided into two groups according to different adhesive: Prime
&
Bond NT
TM for Group A and self-etching adhesive Adper
TM Prompt
TM for group B. All teeth were restored directly with AP compomer. The retention of the restorations was observed after 3 months
6 months and 1 year. Results After 3 months
the rate of broken-off restoration of group A and group B is 7.5 % and 5.0 % respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (p
>
0.05). After 6 months
the rate of broken-off restoration of group A and group B is 17.5 % and 12.5 % respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (p
>
0.05). After 1 year
the rate of broken-off restoration of group A and group B is 27.5 % and 17.5 % respectively .Group A had more broken-off restorations and there was significant difference between two groups (p
<
0.05). Conclusion AP compomer had some curative effect when used to restore the incisal corner defect directly
and the retention of the restorations would be improved if self-etching adhesive was used.
AP复合体直接修复切角缺损固位
AP compomerdirect restorationincisal corner defectretention
0
浏览量
22
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621