西南医科大学附属医院康复医学科,泸州,646000
Published:2023,
Published Online:20 March 2023,
扫 描 看 全 文
JI Yuxiu, XIE Yujie, LIANG Bin, et al. Comparison of effect of radical and focus shock wave transdermal drug delivery. [J]. Journal of Southwest Medical University 46(2):147-151(2023)
JI Yuxiu, XIE Yujie, LIANG Bin, et al. Comparison of effect of radical and focus shock wave transdermal drug delivery. [J]. Journal of Southwest Medical University 46(2):147-151(2023) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3351.2023.02.012.
目的比较发散与聚集式冲击波经皮透药的效果,为临床给药途经提供新的最佳生物学依据。方法将9 只雌性SD 大鼠随机分为3 组:①对照组;②发散式冲击波(radial extracorporeal shock wave,RESW)组(能流:0.35 mJ/mm2,频率:2 Hz,频次:400 次);③ 聚焦式冲击波(focus extracorporeal shock wave,FESW)组(能流:0.16 mJ/mm2,频率:2 Hz,频次:400 次)。使用微正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(micro positron emission tomography/computed tomography,MPET/CT)观察[18]F-NaF 的分布。此外,将12 只SD 大鼠随机分为4 组:①对照组;②FESW 组1(0.03 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 次);③ FESW 组2(0.16 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 次);④FESW 组3(0.35 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 次)。使用高效液相色谱法(high-performance liquid chromatography,HPLC)检测聚焦式冲击波处理后双氯芬酸钠和葡萄糖的透药效率。通过使用重复测量方差分析观察统计学意义。结果通过MPET/CT 观察到FESW 能将[18]F-NaF 穿透皮肤,而RESW 不能。第二阶段研究发现在一定的能量范围内FESW 的能量越高,其渗透力越强。5 h 后分别测量与对照组相比,不同能量下双氯芬酸钠组(对照组160.947 ± 14.973; FESW 1 组189.833 ± 19.202; FESW 组298.464 ± 61.304; FESW 组267.088 ±32.783)、葡萄糖组的药物浓度(对照组17.790 ± 2.944; FESW 1 组58.959± 17.409; FESW 组54.279 ± 7.76; FESW 组56.417 ± 3.397)。重复测量方差分析发现受试者内效应(双氯芬酸钠,F = 4.77,P = 0.03),(葡萄糖,F = 8.95,P = 0.006),对照组、FESW 组1 和FESW 组2 之间有显著性差异(P< 0.05)。结论本研究发现FESW 较RESW 具有更好的药物渗透作用,可以将[18]F-NaF、葡萄糖和双氯芬酸钠透入大鼠体内。本研究结果为临床给药途径提供了新的生物学依据。
Objective This study aimed to observe the functional application of shock wave(SW)in transdermal drug delivery (TDD)and to explore the distribution of drugs after transdermal administration by two types of shock wave. Methods Nine female Sprague-Dawley(SD)rats were randomly divided into 3 groups: ①control group; ② RESW group(0.35 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 pulse);③ FESW group(0.16 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 pulse). Micro positron emission tomography/computed tomography(MPET/CT)was used to observe the distribution of [18]F-NaF. Furthermore,12 SD rats were randomly divided into 4 groups: ① control group; ② FESW group 1 (0.03 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 pulse); ③FESW group 2(0.16 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 pulse); ④ FESW group 3(0.35 mJ/mm2,2 Hz,400 pulse). High-performance liquid chromatography(HPLC)was used to test the penetration efficiency of diclofenac sodium and glucose treated with FESW. Statistical significance was conducted by analysis of variance of repeated measurement. Results It was observed by MPET/CT that FESW could penetrate [18]F-NaF through the skin,while RESW could not. The second stage study found that within a certain energy range,the higher the energy of FESW,the stronger its permeability. 5 hours later,compared with the control group,the drug concentration of diclofenac sodium group(control group 160.947 ± 14.973; FESW 1 group 189.833 ± 19.202; FESW group 2 298.464 ± 61.304; FESW group 3 267.088 ± 32.783)and glucose group(control group 17.790 ± 2.944; FESW 1 group 58.959 ± 17.409; FESW group 2 54.279 ± 7.76; FESW group 3 56.417 ± 3.397)under different energy was measured. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed that the within-subject effect(diclofenac sodium,F=4.77,p=0.03; glucose,F = 8.95,P = 0.006)was significantly different among the control group,FESW group 1 and FESW group 2(P < 0.05). Conclusion The study found that FESW had good drug permeability and could penetrate [18]F-NaF,glucose and diclofenac sodium into the rat body,which provided new biological evidence for new route administration.
冲击波经皮透药发散式冲击波聚集式冲击波微正电子发射断层扫描计算机断层扫描高效液相色谱法
Shock wave(SW)Transdermal drug delivery(TDD)Radial extracorporeal shock wave(RESW)Focused extracorporeal shock wave(FESW)Micro positron emission tomography/computed tomography(PET/CT)High-Performance Liquid Chromatography( HPLC)
0
Views
5
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
