Application of blended teaching based on MOOC and TBL in a medical general education course
Teaching Reform|更新时间:2024-11-27
|
Application of blended teaching based on MOOC and TBL in a medical general education course
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchVol. 23, Issue 11, Pages: 1489-1494(2024)
作者机构:
1.中山大学附属第一医院健康管理中心,广州 510080
2.中山大学护理学院,广州 510080
3.中山大学附属第一医院急诊科,广州 510080
作者简介:
Ye Zi, Email: yezi9@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金信息:
2021 Higher Education Teaching Reform Project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (Guangdong Education Gao Han〔2021〕No. 29)(粤教高函〔2021〕29号);2023 Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Engineering Project of Sun Yat-sen University(80000-12220011)
Wu Liping, Wan Lihong, Huang Yingxiong, et al. Application of blended teaching based on MOOC and TBL in a medical general education course. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(11):1489-1494.
Wu Liping, Wan Lihong, Huang Yingxiong, et al. Application of blended teaching based on MOOC and TBL in a medical general education course. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research, 2024,23(11):1489-1494. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230521-01843.
Application of blended teaching based on MOOC and TBL in a medical general education course
To investigate the teaching effects of blended teaching based on massive open online courses (MOOC) combined with team-based learning (TBL) for the general elective course
First Aid for Burns
for non-medical college students.
Methods
2
We assigned 73 non-medical college students choosing the
Common Home Health Issues and Care
course in the spring semester of 2023 to receive blended teaching based on MOOC and TBL (experimental group)
and 113 non-medical college students choosing the same course in the spring semester of 2024 to receive traditional lecture-based learning (control group). A self-evaluation questionnaire was used to eval
uate the teaching effects and satisfaction with the course of the two groups. SPSS 27.0 was used to perform the
t
-test and chi-square test.
Results
2
The experimental group showed significantly higher proportions of students who had a complete mastery of knowledge of first aid for burns (54.8% vs. 33.6%
P
<
0.01) and students who provided positive feedback on improving autonomous learning ability (98.6% vs. 78.8%
P
<
0.001)
improving the ability of teamwork (100.0% vs. 68.1%
P
<
0.001)
improving communication ability (98.6% vs. 72.6%
P
<
0.001)
and overall satisfaction with the course (97.3% vs. 76.6%
P
<
0.001) compared with the control group.
Conclusions
2
The blended teaching model based on MOOC and TBL can improve the teaching effects of
First Aid for Burns
for non-medical college students
enhancing their autonomous learning
teamwork
and communication abilities. This method is applicable to medical general education courses
which is worthy of promotion and application.
关键词
慕课以团队为基础的教学混合式教学通识教育
Keywords
Massive open online courseTeam-based learningBlended teachingGeneral education
Burgess AW, McGregor DM, Mellis CM. Applying established guidelines to team-based learning programs in medical schools: a systematic review [J]. Acad Med, 2014, 89(4): 678-688. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000162.
Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, et al. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65 [J]. Med Teach, 2012, 34(5): e275-e287. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179.
Kang HY, Kim HR. Impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in the public healthcare education course: a review of flipped classroom with team-based learning [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2021, 21(1): 78. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02508-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02508-y.
River J, Currie J, Crawford T, et al. A systematic review examining the effectiveness of blending technology with team-based learning [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2016, 45: 185-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.012http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.012.
Alabdulkarim L. University health sciences students rating for a blended learning course framework [J]. Saudi J Biol Sci, 2021, 28(9): 5379-5385. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.059http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.059.
Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works? [J]. Adv Physiol Educ, 2006, 30(4): 159-167. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00053.2006http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
Zeng J, Liu L, Tong X, et al. Application of blended teaching model based on SPOC and TBL in dermatology and venereology [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2021, 21(1): 606. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-03042-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03042-7.
James S, Cogan P, McCollum M. Team-based learning for immunology courses in allied health programs [J]. Front Immunol, 2019, 10: 2477. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02477http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.02477.
Shen J, Qi H, Chen Y, et al. Incorporating modified team-based learning into a flipped basic medical laboratory course: impact on student performance and perceptions [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22(1): 608. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03676-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03676-1.
Malekigorji M, Corbett D, Hanna LA, et al. An investigation of Chinese students academic performance, and their views on the learning experience, associated with flipped team-based learning [J]. Lit Inf Comput Educ J, 2018, 9(1): 2788-2799. DOI: 10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0368http://dx.doi.org/10.20533/licej.2040.2589.2018.0368.
Albarrak AI, Zakaria N, Almulhem J, et al. Modified team-based and blended learning perception: a cohort study among medical students at King Saud University [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2021, 21(1): 199. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02639-2http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02639-2.