Quality issues in reviews written by medical postgraduate students: investigation and countermeasures

Chu Jingshen

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230117-01311

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Quality issues in reviews written by medical postgraduate students: investigation and countermeasures

Graduate Education | 更新时间：2023-07-15

- Quality issues in reviews written by medical postgraduate students: investigation and countermeasures
- Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Vol. 22, Issue 6, Pages: 864-868(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院《诊断学理论与实践》编辑部，上海　200025
- 作者简介：
  
  Chu Jingshen, Email: chujingshen@126.com
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230117-01311
  CLC： R44;G232
- Published：20 June 2023，
  
  Received：17 January 2023，
扫描看全文
褚敬申. 医学硕士研究生的综述质量问题调查及对策[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(6): 864-868.

Chu Jingshen. Quality issues in reviews written by medical postgraduate students: investigation and countermeasures. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(6):864-868(2023)
褚敬申. 医学硕士研究生的综述质量问题调查及对策[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(6): 864-868. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230117-01311.

Chu Jingshen. Quality issues in reviews written by medical postgraduate students: investigation and countermeasures. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(6):864-868(2023) DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20230117-01311.

摘要

目的

调查医学硕士研究生撰写的综述质量问题，为提升该群体撰写的医学综述的质量提供参考。

方法

收集2018年至2022年上海交通大学医学院各附属医院在读医学硕士研究生撰写的141篇医学综述，从综述选题、写作表达维度评估撰写质量。综述选题采用自行设计的选题创新性调查问卷（以下简称“选题问卷”）收集外审专家的评价；写作表达依据相关文献提示的综述评价标准，考查综述的提纲、参考文献时效性、分析评价及文本质量问题。采用EPIDATA 3.2录入数据，采用SPSS 20.0进行卡方检验。

结果

本研究共回收有效选题问卷135份（96%，135/141），结果提示70%（94/135）的综述选题缺乏新意。写作表达调查结果提示，95%（128/135）的综述参考文献陈旧，68%（92/135）的综述提纲缺乏重点、层次或逻辑，占比均分别高于分析及评价（59%，80/135）和文本质量问题（61%，83/135），差异有统计学意义（

0.05）。

结论

医学硕士研究生撰写的医学综述存在选题创新性不足、提纲总体质量偏低等问题，学校及导师首先应加强与综述选题相关的创新思维指导方面的教学，同时也应重视科研分析、科研逻辑等科研写作表达的相关培训，从而提高医学硕士研究生相应的科研能力。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the quality issues in medical reviews written by medical postgraduate students

and to provide a reference for improving the quality of medical reviews written by such students.

Methods

A total of 141 medical reviews written by the medical postgraduate students from various affiliated hospitals of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from 2018 to 2022 were collected

and the quality of these medical reviews was evaluated in terms of topic selection and writing expression skills. As for topic selection

a self-designed innovative questionnaire (hereinafter referred to as topic questionnaire) was used to collect the evaluation of external experts

and as for writing expression

the reviews were assessed based on the criteria in relevant literature from the aspects of the outline of the review

the timeliness of references

analysis and evaluation

and the quality of the text. EPIDATA 3.2 was used to input data

and SPSS 20.0 was used for the chi-square test.

Results

A total of 135 (96%

135/141) valid questionnaires were collected in this study

and the results showed that 70% (94/135) of the review topics lacked novelty. The assessment of writing skills showed that 95% (128/135) of the reviews had outdated references

and 68% (92/135) lacked focus

hierarchy or logic in outline

which accounted for a higher proportion than the reviews with analysis and evaluation issues (59%

80/135) and text quality issues (61%

83/135) (

0.05).

Conclusion

There are many quality issues in the medical reviews written by medical postgraduate students

such as a lack of novelty in topic selection and low overall quality of outlines. In order to improve the abilities of scientific research among medical postgraduate students

universities and supervisors should strengthen the guidance of innovative thinking in topic selection and enhance the training of writing expression skills

such as scientific analysis and logic.

关键词

医学硕士研究生医学综述质量调查选题创新性写作技能

Keywords

Medical postgraduate studentMedical reviewQuality investigationTopic selection noveltyWriting skill

references

王凤清，彭耕，王青. 临床/口腔医学博士专业学位论文质量现状分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志， 2022， 21（11）： 1446-1449. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200405-01055http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200405-01055.

姚荣. 浅议学术论文文献综述的写作[J]. 写作，2011（Z1）： 89-91. DOI: 10.19867/j.cnki.writing.2011.z1.030http://dx.doi.org/10.19867/j.cnki.writing.2011.z1.030.

李忠. 研究生学术写作与训练的困境及其纾困：基于学位论文写作规范问题的分析[J]. 学位与研究生教育，2022， 39（4）： 12-19. DOI: 10.16750/j.adge.2022.04.003http://dx.doi.org/10.16750/j.adge.2022.04.003.

李崧，张军，韩秋琴，等. 如何提高医学综述的写作水平[J]. 中华神经科杂志， 2022， 55（12）： 1335-1340. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113694-20220429-00346http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113694-20220429-00346.

李伟华，李传云. 提升医学科学学位硕士研究生科研素养的探讨[J]. 基础医学教育， 2023， 25（2）： 163-165. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn2095-1450.2023.02.17http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn2095-1450.2023.02.17.

陈立宏，李旭，吴永康，等. 关于研究生文献综述撰写的几点建议[J]. 教育教学论坛， 2022（31）： 149-152.

熊淑慧. 研究生新手写作者与专家的文献综述写作对比研究[J]. 上海理工大学学报（社会科学版）， 2021， 43（3）： 228-235. DOI: 10.13256/j.cnki.jusst.sse.2021.03.005http://dx.doi.org/10.13256/j.cnki.jusst.sse.2021.03.005.

夏爽. 编辑如何通过审稿与退修提高综述文章的质量[J]. 编辑学报， 2016， 28（5）： 450-452. DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2016.05.013http://dx.doi.org/10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2016.05.013.

HU J. The schematic structure of literature review in research articles of applied linguistics [J]. Chin J Appl Linguist (Bimonthly), 2010, 33(5): 15-27．

Kwan BSC. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics [J]. Engl Specif Purp, 2006, 25(1): 30-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.06.001.

唐佩瑾，吴美美. 从文献回顾探究硕士论文创新书写现象[J]. 图书馆学与资讯科学， 2013， 39（2）： 4-25．

黄丽娟，奚志刚. 综述型论文的选稿技巧[J]. 编辑学报， 2006， 18（1）： 23. DOI: 10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2006.01.008http://dx.doi.org/10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2006.01.008.

张华，徐影，姜晓晨，等. 医学研究生学术论文写作中存在的问题及分析[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报， 2019， 53（4）： 446-447. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1905.2019.04.026http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1905.2019.04.026.

吴旺泽，郑晟，杨宁，等. 分子生物学原始文献导读结合课程设计的教学改革与实证研究[J]. 高校生物学教学研究（电子版）， 2022， 12（5）： 21-28. DOI: 10.3868/j.issn.2095-1574.2022.05.004http://dx.doi.org/10.3868/j.issn.2095-1574.2022.05.004.

Round JE, Campbell AM. Figure facts: encouraging undergraduates to take a data-centered approach to reading primary literature [J]. CBE Life Sci Educ, 2013, 12(1): 39-46. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.11-07-0057http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-07-0057.

Swales JM. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

褚敬申. PubPeer有关中国学术论文的评论分析及思考[J]. 中国科技期刊研究， 2022， 33（11）： 1499-1506. DOI: 10.11946/cjstp.202111070869http://dx.doi.org/10.11946/cjstp.202111070869.

蒙世佼，任依，许蓉. 临床医学研究生导师能力评价指标体系的构建及信度和效度分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志， 2022， 21（11）： 1441-1446. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210420-01054http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210420-01054.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰