Application of situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling
返回论文页
XXXX|更新时间:2023-12-26
|
Application of situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchPages: 1-6(2023)
作者机构:
中山大学附属第一医院妇产科,广州 510080
作者简介:
Zhou Yi, Email: zhouyi6@mail.sysu.edu.cn
基金信息:
2021 Undergraduate Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project of Sun Yat-Sen University(31911130-210407);2022 Postgraduate Medical Education Teaching Reform in the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University(B202218);2022 Guangdong Undergraduate Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project(粤教高函[2023]4号)
Liu Jingyu, Zhao Jingya, Huang Xuan, et al. Application of situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling. [J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 1-6(2023)
DOI:
Liu Jingyu, Zhao Jingya, Huang Xuan, et al. Application of situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling. [J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 1-6(2023) DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20221003-01556.
Application of situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling
To investigate the application effect of situational simulation combined with the debriefing-gather-analyze-summarize (GAS) method in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling.
Methods
2
A total of 30 medical students of the five- and eight-year programs in the classes of 2017 and 2018 who received genetic counseling training in The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from May 2021 to May 2022 were selected as research subjects
and situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method was used for the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling. Assessment was performed by the teacher to evaluate the change in genetic counseling abilities during the teaching process
and a questionnaire survey was conducted to investigate the degree of satisfaction with teaching among the students. SPSS 26.0 software was used for data analysis; normally distributed continuous data were expressed as mean±standard deviation
non-normally distributed continuous data were expressed as
M(min-max)
and categorical data were expressed as frequency and rate; the paired samples
t
-test was used for comparison of assessment scores before and after teaching.
Results
2
After teaching
there were significant increases in the assessment scores of genetic counseling (74.5±18.6 points vs. 87.2±14.5 points
t
=4.10
P
<
0.001) and comprehensive abilities such as clinical ability (35.4±9.6 points vs. 41.1±6.9 points
t
=3.72
P
=0.001)
doctor-patient communication (17.5±4.6 points vs. 20.8±3.8 points
t
=4.34
P
<
0.001)
professional literacy (11.0±2.5 points vs. 12.5±2.3 points
t
=2.89
P
=0.007)
teamwork (3.5±1.0 points vs. 4.2±0.8 points
t
=3.67
P
=0.001)
and organizational effectiveness (7.1±2.0 points vs. 8.3±1.7 points
t
=2.94
P
=0.006). The questionnaire survey showed that the degree of satisfaction among students was rated above satisfaction for the reasonability of the implementation process and links of genetic counseling teaching [3.0 (2.0-4.0) points]
teaching quality [3.5 (2.0-4.0) points]
whether the teaching model could effectively increase the interest and initiative in learning [4.0 (3.0-4.0) points]
the improvement in theoretical knowledge [4.0 (3.0-4.0) points]
communication skills in genetic counseling [4.0 (2.0-4.0) points]
and the understanding of related techniques and application prospect [3.0 (2.0-4.0) points]
. However
two students (6.7%) thought that this teaching model could not efficiently reach teaching objectives
since the teaching process was slightly complicated.
Conclusion
2
Situational simulation combined with the debriefing-GAS method has achieved a good effect in the teaching of prenatal genetic counseling and can help undergraduates to master the theoretical knowledge of prenatal genetic counseling and improve their comprehensive clinical abilities
with a relatively high degree of satisfaction
and therefore
it holds promise for clinical application.
关键词
复盘遗传咨询胎儿医学医学模拟教育教学改革
Keywords
DebriefingGenetic counselingFetal medicineSimulation-based medical educationTeaching reform
Freytag J, Stroben F, Hautz WE, et al. Improving patient safety through better teamwork: how effective are different methods of simulation debriefing? Protocol for a pragmatic, prospective and randomised study [J]. BMJ Open, 2017, 7(6): e015977. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015977.
Kessler DO, Cheng A, Mullan PC. Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: a practical guide [J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2015, 65(6): 690-698. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019.
Gardner R. Introduction to debriefing [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2013, 37(3): 166-174. DOI: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.008http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2013.02.008.
Bortolato-Major C, Mantovani MF, Felix JVC, et al. Debriefing evaluation in nursing clinical simulation: a cross-sectional study [J]. Rev Bras Enferm, 2019, 72(3): 788-794. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0103.
Roze des Ordons AL, Eppich W, Lockyer J, et al. Guiding, intermediating, facilitating, and teaching (GIFT): a conceptual framework for simulation educator roles in healthcare debriefing [J]. Simul Healthc, 2022, 17(5): 283-292. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000619http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000619.