1.河北医科大学教师发展中心,石家庄 050017
2.河北师范大学教育学院,石家庄 050024
3.河北医科大学公共卫生学院,石家庄 050017
Zheng Bin, Email: doublezb@sina.com
Published:20 June 2023,
Received:10 June 2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
邵娟娟, 闫丽娜, 陈颖, 等. 高等医学院校教师教学投入对教学效果满意度的影响分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(6): 947-951.
Shao Juanjuan, Yan Lina, Chen Ying, et al. Analysis of the influence of teachers' teaching input on teaching effect satisfaction in medical colleges. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(6):947-951(2023)
邵娟娟, 闫丽娜, 陈颖, 等. 高等医学院校教师教学投入对教学效果满意度的影响分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(6): 947-951. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220610-01330.
Shao Juanjuan, Yan Lina, Chen Ying, et al. Analysis of the influence of teachers' teaching input on teaching effect satisfaction in medical colleges. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(6):947-951(2023) DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220610-01330.
目的
2
调研分析医学院校教师教学投入对教学效果满意度的影响。
方法
2
采用多阶段分层随机抽样法,选取河北省某地方医学院校基础医学教师与临床教师共782人作为调查对象。通过(均数±标准差)描述教师教学投入现状,用
t
或
F
检验进行组间比较,用多重线性回归分析教学投入对教学效果满意度的影响。
结果
2
医学院校教师教学投入受不同人口特征因素影响,其中教学时间投入受性别、年龄、职称、教龄、学历及类别影响(均
P
<
0.05),情感投入受年龄、职称、教龄、学历及类别影响(均
P
<
0.05),教学能力发展投入受年龄、职称、教龄、类别影响(均
P
<
0.05)。教师人口特征因素及教学投入与其教学效果满意度存在相关性,其中教师教龄与教学效果满意度为负相关(
β
=-0.057,
P
<
0.05),备课时数、周授课时数、教学重视程度、医教研平衡程度、教学技能培训、教学观摩等亚项指标与教学效果满意度存在正相关性(均
P
<
0.05)。基础医学教师教学投入显著高于临床教师(均
P
<
0.05)。
结论
2
建议医学院校及临床教学基地要重视教师梯队建设;优化政策措施,平衡医教研三者关系;构建教师教学工作投入的支持体系,提升教师职业效能感;建设基础医学教师与临床教师相融合的教师专业发展共同体,提升医学生培养质量。
Objective
2
To investigate and analyze the influencing factors of teachers' teaching input status on teaching effect satisfaction in medical colleges.
Methods
2
A total of 782 teachers of basic medicine and clinical medicine in a local medical college in Hebei Province were selected by multi-stage stratified random sampling method. The (mean ± standard deviation) was used to describe the status quo of teachers' teaching input
and the
t
- or
F
-test was used for inter-group comparison. The influence of teaching input on teaching satisfaction was analyzed by multiple linear regression.
Results
2
The teaching input of medical college teachers was affected by different demographic characteristics
among which the teaching time input was affected by gender
age
professional title
teaching age
educational background and category (all
P
<
0.05)
the emotional input was affected by age
professional title
teaching age
educational background and category (all
P
<
0.05)
and the teaching ability development input was affected by age
professional title
teaching age and category (all
P
<
0.05). There was a correlation between the population characteristics of teachers and the teaching input and the satisfaction of teaching effect
and the teaching age of teachers is negatively correlated with the satisfaction of teaching effect (
β
=-0.057
P
<
0.05). There were positive correlations between teaching satisfaction and teaching effect (all
P
<
0.05)
including the number of lesson preparation hours
the number of weekly teaching hours
the degree of teaching attention
the degree of medical teaching research balance
the learning and expansion of teaching skills
and the difference of teaching observation reflecting teaching input. The teaching input of basic medicine teachers was significantly higher than that of clinical teachers (all
P
<
0.05).
Conclusion
2
It is suggested that medical colleges and clinical teaching bases should pay attention to the construction of teacher echelon
optimization of policies and measures to balance the relationship between medical education and research
construction of the support system of teachers' teaching work input to improve teachers' professional efficacy
and the building of a professional development community of teachers integrating basic medical teachers and clinical teachers to improve the training quality of medical students.
教学投入教学效果满意度医学院校教师发展
Teaching inputTeaching effect satisfactionFaculty development in medical colleges
郭建鹏, 唐祯, 吕帅. 什么因素影响了中国高校教师的教学投入: 基于个体与环境两水平变量的分层线性模型分析[J]. 教育发展研究, 2022, 42(9): 57-70. DOI: 10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2022.09.008http://dx.doi.org/10.14121/j.cnki.1008-3855.2022.09.008.
陈睿, 万可. 地方本科院校教师教学投入行为调查与分析: 以湖北省属本科院校为例[J]. 当代教育论坛, 2021(4): 87-98. DOI: 10.13694/j.cnki.ddjylt.20210511.001http://dx.doi.org/10.13694/j.cnki.ddjylt.20210511.001.
李爽, 钟瑶. 在线教师教学投入对学生学习绩效的影响: 基于教师和学生的视角[J]. 开放教育研究, 2020, 26(3): 99-110. DOI: 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2020.03.011http://dx.doi.org/10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2020.03.011.
陈运平, 李婷, 罗序斌. 教师工作投入研究动态与未来展望[J]. 现代教育管理, 2018(4): 61-66. DOI: 10.16697/j.cnki.xdjygl.2018.04.011http://dx.doi.org/10.16697/j.cnki.xdjygl.2018.04.011.
阎光才. 高水平大学教师本科教学投入及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国高教研究, 2018(11): 22-27. DOI: 10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2018.11.05http://dx.doi.org/10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2018.11.05.
冯爱秋, 杨鹏, 林琳. 地方高校教师教学投入状况调查分析[J]. 中国大学教学, 2015(12): 68-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2015.12.016http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0450.2015.12.016.
柳友荣. 教师“教学投入不足”: 概念内涵、现实问题与实践向度[J]. 江苏高教, 2020(11): 66-74. DOI: 10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2020.11.011http://dx.doi.org/10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2020.11.011.
翟洪江. 高校教师本科教学投入的影响因素与对策研究[J]. 教育探索, 2015(5): 144-148.
刘振天. 高校教师教学投入的理论、现况及其策略[J]. 中国高教研究, 2013(8): 14-19, 47. DOI: 10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2013.08.005http://dx.doi.org/10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2013.08.005.
顾泠沅. 教学任务的变革[J]. 教育发展研究, 2001, 21(10): 5-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3855.2001.10.001http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3855.2001.10.001.
骆舒寒, 林世员, 冯晓英, 等. 教师培训助力教师信息化教学能力提升: 基于培训成效的年度比较研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2021(6): 128-134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2021.06.017http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9860.2021.06.017.
徐雄伟, 张国平. 民办高校教师自我导向学习对其教学投入的影响研究[J]. 教师教育研究, 2020, 32(5): 16-23. DOI: 10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2020.05.003http://dx.doi.org/10.13445/j.cnki.t.e.r.2020.05.003.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
