Evaluation of teaching effect of opening experiments on occupational health and occupational medicine
返回论文页
Teaching Reform|更新时间:2023-04-14
|
Evaluation of teaching effect of opening experiments on occupational health and occupational medicine
Chinese Journal of Medical Education ResearchVol. 22, Issue 2, Pages: 198-202(2023)
作者机构:
西安医学院公共卫生学院,西安 710000
作者简介:
Men Ke, Email: menke@foxmail.com
基金信息:
Key Research Project of Education and Teaching Reform of Xi'an Medical University in 2020(2020JG-11);The National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Project(81900408;82001181);Key Scientific Research Program of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education(20JS137);Public Emergency Project of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education(20JG027)
Wang Xuemei, Cao Ying, Xing Yuan, et al. Evaluation of teaching effect of opening experiments on occupational health and occupational medicine. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(2):198-202(2023)
Wang Xuemei, Cao Ying, Xing Yuan, et al. Evaluation of teaching effect of opening experiments on occupational health and occupational medicine. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(2):198-202(2023) DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220426-01172.
Evaluation of teaching effect of opening experiments on occupational health and occupational medicine
To carry out opening experiments on occupational health and occupational medicine for students majoring in preventive medicine
reform the experimental teaching mode
and explore the teaching methods to improve students' professional quality and scientific research ability.
Methods
2
Opening experiments were carried out in the experimental course of occupational health and occupational medicine for students of preventive medicine major. A total of 147 students majoring in preventive medicine of Batch 2016 were classified as the control group
and the routine confirmatory experiment was carried out in the group; 176 students majoring in preventive medicine of Batch 2017 were classified as the experimental group
and this group carried out opening experiment. The evaluation was made from three aspects: comprehensive evaluation results
teacher self-evaluation and student satisfaction survey. SPSS 22.0 software was used for analysis and comparison by independent-samples
t
-test and Chi-square test.
Results
2
The theoretical scores of the experimental group and the control group students were (84.37±10.45) vs. (81.44±9.22) (
t
=2.68
P
=0.008)
and the experimental skills scores were (93.66±3.89) vs. (88.41±5.67) (
t
=9.51
P
<
0.001). Questionnaire investigation showed that the students in the opening experimental group were more satisfied with the courses arrangement (
χ
2
=8.31
P=
0.004)
group cooperation (
χ
2
=21.10
P<
0.001)
assessment form (
χ
2
=7.92
P=
0.005)
improvement of the writing ability of scientific research papers (
χ
2
=17.56
P<
0.001)
improvement of practical skills (
χ
2
=11.70
P=
0.001)
logical thinking
language organization and expression ability (
χ
2
=10.33
P=
0.001). They considered the opening experiment was helpful to cultivate innovative thinking and ability
but it had limited effect on the cultivation of employment advantages. And the students considered the opening experiments of setting up professional courses was sufficient and necessary.
Conclusion
2
Carrying out opening experiments for students majoring in preventive medicine is helpful to improve students' professional quality and cultivate their practical ability and scientific research ability.
Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2014, 111(23): 8410-8415. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Schwartzstein RM, Dienstag JL, King RW, et al. The Harvard medical school pathways curriculum: reimagining developmentally appropriate medical education for contemporary learners [J]. Acad Med, 2020, 95(11): 1687-1695. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.000000000000 3270http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003270.
Hueppchen NA, Ziegelstein RC, Record JD. The Johns Hopkins university school of medicine [J]. Acad Med, 2020, 95(9s a snapshot of medical student education in the unite): S206-S210. DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000003480http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000003480.