An analytical method for topic bias in course paper grading

Zhang Mengke; Song Wei; Li Dan; Shen Bingzheng; Chen Ying; Wang Zongchun; Guo Xianxi

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220107-01443

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

An analytical method for topic bias in course paper grading

Educational Research | 更新时间：2023-11-01

- An analytical method for topic bias in course paper grading
- Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Vol. 22, Issue 10, Pages: 1472-1475(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.武汉大学人民医院药学部，武汉　430060
  2.武汉大学第一临床学院，武汉　430060
- 作者简介：
  
  Zhang Mengke, Email: zhmke@126.com
- 基金信息：
  
  Teaching Reform Foundation of Wuhan University School of Medicine(2019023;2022ZG187)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220107-01443
  CLC： R-05
- Published：20 October 2023，
  
  Received：07 January 2022，
扫描看全文
张孟科, 宋伟, 李丹, 等. 课程论文评分中的主题偏倚分析方法研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1472-1475.

Zhang Mengke, Song Wei, Li Dan, et al. An analytical method for topic bias in course paper grading. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(10):1472-1475(2023)
张孟科, 宋伟, 李丹, 等. 课程论文评分中的主题偏倚分析方法研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1472-1475. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220107-01443.

Zhang Mengke, Song Wei, Li Dan, et al. An analytical method for topic bias in course paper grading. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(10):1472-1475(2023) DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20220107-01443.

摘要

课程论文评分往往主观性较强，教师在对课程论文进行评分时可能因对特定主题的论文存在偏倚而在评分中引入偏差，导致论文评分不能准确反映学生的真实水平。本文以《临床药理学》课程论文评分结果为实例，对检验课程论文评分结果中是否包含主题偏倚的分析方法进行了探讨。通过计算纵向偏倚因子和横向偏倚因子，比较了同一教师对不同主题的论文和不同教师对同一主题的论文评分上的差异，构建了一种科学、易行的分析方法。该方法可帮助教师快速发现课程论文评分中是否隐含相关偏差，从而使课程论文评分更加客观准确。

Abstract

Course paper grading often involves subjective factors. Teachers may introduce biases into the grading due to their preferences for certain topics

resulting in inaccurate grading results that fail to reflect the true abilities of students. Taking the grading results of the "Clinical Pharmacology" course as an example

this article investigates the analytical method for detecting topic bias in the course paper grading. A comparative analysis was performed on the differences in the scores between different topics graded by the same teacher and between the same topic graded by different teachers by calculating the vertical bias factor and the horizontal bias factor

and a scientific and feasible analytical method was established. This method can help teachers quickly discover biases in their course paper grading

thereby making the grading more objective and accurate.

关键词

课程论文评分主题偏倚偏倚因子

Keywords

Course paperGradingTopic biasBias factor

references

王艳霞，胡优敏，冯雪梅，等. 实验整合课程考核评估体系建设实践[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志， 2019， 18（11）： 1103-1107. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.11.006http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2019.11.006.

Lynch GJ. The effect of theacher course work on student learning-evidence from the TEL [J]. J Econ Educ, 2014, 21(3): 287-296. DOI: 10.2307/1182248http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1182248.

Ma X. A longitudinal assessment of antecedent course work in mathematics and subsequent mathematical attainment [J]. J Educ Res, 2000, 94(1): 16-28. DOI: 10.1080/00220670009598739http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220670009598739.

张松艳. 基于课程论文的研究生计量经济学教学改革：以浙江科技学院为例[J]. 浙江科技学院学报， 2019， 31（4）： 335-338. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8798.2019.04.012http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8798.2019.04.012.

赵彦芳. 从课程论文到学位论文：提升论文写作素养，深化课程教学改革[J]. 扬州大学学报（高教研究版）， 2017， 21（3）： 78-81. DOI: 10.19411/j.cnki.1007-8606.2017.03.016http://dx.doi.org/10.19411/j.cnki.1007-8606.2017.03.016.

Sheehe JB, Schoener L. Primary trait analysis student, course, and program assessment [J]. Nurse Educ, 2009, 34(3): 114-117. DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31819fca9dhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e31819fca9d.

柴斌锋，竺素娥. 沃尔比重评分法在学生平时成绩考核中的应用[J]. 亚太教育， 2016（17）： 228-229. DOI: 10.16550/j.cnki.2095-9214.2016.17.186http://dx.doi.org/10.16550/j.cnki.2095-9214.2016.17.186.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰