1.长沙医学院国际教育学院,长沙 410219
2.长沙医学院药理学教研室,长沙 410219
3.长沙医学院第一临床学院,长沙 410219
Bao Meihua, Email: mhbao78@163.com
Published:20 April 2023,
Received:27 December 2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
鲍美华, 李海刚, 郝一. 基于“雨课堂”的教学在留学生药理学教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 531-535.
Bao Meihua, Li Haigang, Hao Yi. The application of "Rain Classroom" in Pharmacology teaching for MBBS international students. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(4):531-535(2023)
鲍美华, 李海刚, 郝一. 基于“雨课堂”的教学在留学生药理学教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 531-535. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211227-01240.
Bao Meihua, Li Haigang, Hao Yi. The application of "Rain Classroom" in Pharmacology teaching for MBBS international students. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(4):531-535(2023) DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20211227-01240.
目的
2
本研究比较了“雨课堂”教学和传统教学在医学学士(Bachelor of Medicine & Bachelor of Surgery,MBBS)留学生药理学教学中的作用。
方法
2
研究选取了55名2016级MBBS留学生,按照学习成绩、年龄、性别、学习态度、学习能力、生源地,分为“雨课堂”试验组(27人)和传统教学对照组(28人)。试验组采用“雨课堂”辅助教学,对照组采用传统教学。授课教师由本校从事多年留学生药理学课程的教师承担,两个组授课教师相同。授课内容为教材
Lippincott’s Illustrated Reviews,Pharmacology
(Karen Whalen著)中的“抗高血压药”章节。教学效果以考试方式进行,包括知识考核(70分)和过程性评价(30分)。课程结束后对学生进行问卷调查。采用SPSS 11.5进行
t
检验和卡方检验。
结果
2
与传统教学相比,采用“雨课堂”教学后,较传统教学学生考试成绩提高[“雨课堂”组平均考试得分为(58.6±6.8)分,传统教学对照组平均考试得分为(52.3±9.4)分,
P
<
0.05],表明学生对知识的掌握更好。过程性评价显示,试验组学生的参与积极性更高,互动高于对照组(7.4次vs. 2.8次)。两种教学方式下,学生考勤及作业得分差异无统计学意义。问卷调查显示,“雨课堂”教学提升了学生的学习兴趣、提高了上课的专注度,进而促进了知识的掌握度。
结论
2
实践证实“雨课堂”教学方式有利于调动学生的学习积极性,提升教学效果。
Objective
2
To compare the effects of "Rain Classroom" teaching model and traditional teaching model in the Pharmacology teaching for MBBS international students.
Methods
2
A total of 55 MBBS international students of the Batch 2016 were selected
and randomly divided into the "Rain Classroom" teaching group (
n
= 27
experimental group) and the traditional teaching group (
n
= 28
control group) according to their academic performance
age
gender
learning attitude
learning ability
and their original country. The experimental group took "Rain Classroom" assisted teaching
and control group took traditional teaching.The teachers for two groups were the same. They have been engaged in the "Pharmacology" course for international students for many years. The chapter "Antihypertensives" in textbook "
Lippincott's Illustrated Reviews
Pharmacology
(edited by Karen Whalen)" was selected as teaching content. The teaching effects were evaluated by the knowledge assessment (70 points) and process evaluation (30 points). A questionnaire survey was conducted at the end of the course. The results were statistically analyzed by
t
-test and Chi-square test using SPSS 11.5 software.
Results
2
Compared with the traditional teaching group
the students of "Rain Classroom" group obtained a significantly higher score in exam. The average exam score of the "Rain Classroom" group was (58.6±6.8) points
while the average exam score of the traditional teaching group was (52.3±9.4) points
indicating a better mastery of knowledge for "Rain Classroom" group (
P
<
0.05). The process evaluation showed that the students in the "Rain Classroom" group were more active in participation and the interaction
which was significantly higher than that in the traditional teaching group (7.4
vs.
2.8 times per students). No obvious difference was observed in students' attendance and homework scores for these two groups. According to the questionnaire survey
the "Rain Classroom" group enhanced students' interest in learning
improved the concentration in classes
and thus promoted the mastery of knowledge.
Conclusion
2
The present study has confirmed the "Rain Classroom" teaching method is conducive to mobilizing students' enthusiasm for learning and improving teaching effect.
留学生雨课堂教学药理学
International studentRain ClassroomPharmacology
董珺, 黎佼. 留学生医学教育教学模式运用探讨[J]. 中国卫生产业, 2020, 17(9): 141-143. DOI: 10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2020.09.141http://dx.doi.org/10.16659/j.cnki.1672-5654.2020.09.141.
刘宝存, 王婷钰. 高等教育国际化背景下的来华留学生教育:进展、问题及建议[J]. 北京教育(高教版), 2020(5): 8-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7997.2020.05.004http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7997.2020.05.004.
鲍美华, 夏妍, 陈纯静, 等. MBBS留学生药理学翻转课堂的探索与实践[J]. 基础医学教育, 2018, 20(10): 893-895. DOI:10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2018.10.27http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2018.10.27.
Xiangming L, Song S. Mobile technology affordance and its social implications: a case of “Rain Classroom”[J]. Br J Educ Technol, 2018, 49(2): 276-291. DOI:10.1111/bjet.12586http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12586.
吴安杰. 基于“雨课堂”混合式教学模式的实践与思考[J]. 高等建筑教育, 2019, 28(5): 154-159. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1005-http://dx.doi.org/10.11835/j.issn.1005-2909.2019.05.024.
刘玲, 王淑英, 李甜. BOPPPS结合雨课堂在药理学教学中的应用[J]. 基础医学教育, 2020, 22(8): 597-600. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2020.08.18http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2020.08.18.
贺元甲, 林爽, 卢利, 等. 雨课堂在口腔医学教学中的应用与效果评价[J]. 中国医学教育技术, 2020, 34(3): 342-345. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202003021http://dx.doi.org/10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202003021.
肇玉明, 李晓蓉, 熊杰, 等. 基于雨课堂的PBL混合式教学在药理学中的实践[J]. 基础医学教育, 2021, 23(12): 880-882. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2021.12.15http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2021.12.15.
莫海文. 巴基斯坦中小学教师教育问题探析[J]. 外国中小学教育, 2011(2): 57-61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8495.2011.02.013http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8495.2011.02.013.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
