Preliminary construction of evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process

Wang Jia; Li Ran; Ma Xu; Xie Yibo; Li Jiachen; Wu Jiarong; Wang Xiaokun; Yang Chunxiao

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210830-01446

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Preliminary construction of evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process

Educational Research | 更新时间：2023-11-01

- Preliminary construction of evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process
- Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Vol. 22, Issue 10, Pages: 1489-1493(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  哈尔滨医科大学附属第二医院神经内科，哈尔滨　150000
- 作者简介：
  
  Yang Chunxiao, Email: yangchunxiao72@163.com
- 基金信息：
  
  Heilongjiang Province Education Science "13th Five-Year Plan" 2020 Key Project(GJB1320191)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210830-01446
  CLC： R-05
- Published：20 October 2023，
  
  Received：30 August 2021，
扫描看全文
王佳, 李然, 马煦, 等. 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的医学生腰椎穿刺教学评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1489-1493.

Wang Jia, Li Ran, Ma Xu, et al. Preliminary construction of evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(10):1489-1493(2023)
王佳, 李然, 马煦, 等. 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的医学生腰椎穿刺教学评价指标体系构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(10): 1489-1493. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210830-01446.

Wang Jia, Li Ran, Ma Xu, et al. Preliminary construction of evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students based on Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(10):1489-1493(2023) DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210830-01446.

摘要

目的

构建医学生腰椎穿刺教学评价指标体系，旨在创建涵盖理论知识、技能实践、职业素养的科学考核评价方法，用以全面评估医学生腰椎穿刺术教学效果，从而更有效地提升医学生的临床技能实践能力。

方法

通过文献回顾、小组讨论等初步拟定医学生腰椎穿刺教学评价指标方案，邀请临床一线工作和医学相关20名专家，应用德尔菲专家函询对方案进行修订，并应用层次分析法量化条目，确立最终各级指标权重。

结果

本研究两轮函询问卷的有效回收率均为100%。在未更换专家的情况下进行第二轮函询，权威系数为0.88。肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.136和0.184。经过两轮专家函询，最终初步构建了包括3个一级指标（理论知识、临床综合能力、职业素养）、7个二级指标及22个三级指标的医学生腰椎穿刺教学评价指标体系。

结论

本研究构建的医学生腰椎穿刺教学评价指标体系科学、可信，能为医学生培养及考核提供量化依据，具有理论及实践意义。

Abstract

Objective

To construct the evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students

aiming to create a scientific assessment and evaluation method covering theoretical knowledge

skill practice

and professional accomplishment

so as to comprehensively evaluate the teaching effect of lumbar puncture for medical students

and improve the practical ability of clinical skills of medical students more effectively.

Methods

The evaluation index scheme of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students was initially formulated through literature review and group discussion

and 20 experts related to clinical front-line work and medicine were invited to revise the scheme by applying Delphi expert consultation and applying analytic hierarchy process to quantify the entries and establish the final index weights at all levels.

Results

The valid recovery rate of both rounds of expert consultation questionnaires in this study was 100%. The second round of expert consultation was conducted without changing experts

with an authority factor of 0.88. Kendall's coefficient of harmony was 0.136 and 0.184

respectively. After two rounds of expert consultation

the evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students

including 3 primary indicators (theoretical knowledge

comprehensive clinical ability and professionalism)

7 secondary indicators and 22 tertiary indicators

was initially constructed.

Conclusion

The evaluation index system of lumbar puncture teaching for medical students constructed in this study is scientific and credible

which can provide quantitative basis for the training and assessment of medical students

and is of great theoretical and practical significance.

关键词

腰椎穿刺层次分析法德尔菲法

Keywords

Lumbar punctureAnalytic hierarchy processDelphi method

references

陈庆友，李莉，孙兆吉，等. 同伴互助学习在腰椎穿刺技能教学中的应用[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报， 2019， 40（12）： 1530-1531. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2019.12.034http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2019.12.034.

黄卫，邓婉君，夏欧东. 基于岗位胜任力的医学教育改革中外比较[J]. 医学与社会， 2018， 31（6）： 83-86. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2018.06.027http://dx.doi.org/10.13723/j.yxysh.2018.06.027.

刘超，蒲丽娟，王忠利，等. 临床医学专业本科生创新能力培养体系的构建和实践[J]. 解剖学杂志， 2019， 42（5）： 518-519. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2019.05.021http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2019.05.021.

张文静，刘倩蓉，赵雪红，等. 课程思政在药理学实验教学中的实践与反思[J]. 卫生职业教育， 2019， 37（23）： 87-89.

敬洁，顾凤娇，蒋文春. 基于结构-过程-结果三维质量评价模式构建手术室护理管理质量评价体系[J]. 护理研究， 2017， 31（29）： 3659-3662. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.29.011http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.29.011.

Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies [J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014, 67(4): 401-409. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.

林志萍，郑建盛，谢群，等. 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法的应用型临床本科基础医学PBL课程教学质量评价体系研究[J]. 包头医学院学报， 2020， 36（8）： 114-119. DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2020.08.031http://dx.doi.org/10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2020.08.031.

陈玮. 以柯氏模型为导向的护理学教学效果评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 中国社区医师， 2019， 35（33）： 182-183. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2019.33.128http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2019.33.128.

杨婧，沈丽琼，金晓燕，等. 基于层次分析法的护理学情景模拟教学质量评价指标权重的研究[J]. 护理研究， 2017， 31（10）： 1203-1207. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.10.015http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.10.015.

马庚华，郑长江，王天童. 基于模糊层次分析法的实验室安全评估[J]. 贵州大学学报（自然科学版）， 2021， 38（1）： 120-124. DOI: 10.15958/j.cnki.gdxbzrb.2021.01.19http://dx.doi.org/10.15958/j.cnki.gdxbzrb.2021.01.19.

任悦，李丹丹，潘晨，等. 德尔菲法在临床药学中的应用现状[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析， 2019， 19（12）： 1525-1527. DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2019.12.031http://dx.doi.org/10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2019.12.031.

徐蔼婷. 德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J]. 中国统计， 2006（9）： 57-59. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4557.2006.09.032http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-4557.2006.09.032.

Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, et al. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review [J]. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(8): 684-706. DOI: 10.1177/0269216317690685http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690685.

唐龙花，钟清玲. 慢性病老人养老服务需求问卷编制及信效度[J]. 中国老年学杂志， 2018， 38（22）： 5573-5574. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.22.076http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.22.076.

袁胜山，黄建敏，蒙兰青，等. 实习医师腰椎穿刺术中存在的问题与对策[J]. 右江民族医学院学报， 2014（5）： 797-798. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5817.2014.05.064http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5817.2014.05.064.

冯桂波，李志伟. 腰椎穿刺术模拟教学法对全科临床实生的教学效果评价[J]. 临床医药实践， 2017， 26（11）： 878-880.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Construction of teaching evaluation indices for undergraduate medicine students based on the Delphi method

Research on constructing talent training objectives and courses of undergraduate education of tropical medicine by Delphi method

Development of a homogeneous management evaluation system for clinical observership teaching under the background of national first-class discipline construction

The construction of employer's satisfaction evaluation index towards the post competency of residents

Construction of selection index system of clinical nursing teachers based on Delphi method

Related Author

Gu Shixian

Chu Hongling

He Xuan

Xia Qianfeng

Lu Yajun

Yin Li

Dong Sufang

Cai Qunfang

Related Institution

Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital

Department of Education, Peking University Third Hospital

School of Tropical Medicine, Hainan Medial University

School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong Second Medical University

School of Nursing, Shandong Second Medical University

⁰