西安医学院公共卫生学院/陕西省公共安全医学防控研究中心,西安 710021
Published:20 December 2023,
Received:07 April 2021,
扫 描 看 全 文
马永红, 谭姣, 门可, 等. 临床医学专业毕业生综合能力评价及影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(12): 1906-1910.
Ma Yonghong, TanJiao, Men Ke, et al. Research on evaluation of comprehensive ability and influencing factors of graduates in clinical medicine. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(12):1906-1910(2023)
马永红, 谭姣, 门可, 等. 临床医学专业毕业生综合能力评价及影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(12): 1906-1910. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210407-01545.
Ma Yonghong, TanJiao, Men Ke, et al. Research on evaluation of comprehensive ability and influencing factors of graduates in clinical medicine. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(12):1906-1910(2023) DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210407-01545.
目的
2
调查西安某医学院校临床医学专业毕业生的综合能力及影响因素,为完善临床医学专业学生培养模式、提高其综合能力提供科学依据。
方法
2
以《中国本科医学教育标准——临床医学专业(2016版)》为参考,自行设计含有4个维度62个条目的《临床医学专业毕业生综合能力评价问卷》;采用随机抽样的方法以西安某医学院校临床医学专业毕业生为研究对象,对其综合能力现状进行调查;并采用SPSS 22.0统计软件包分析数据,利用多元线性回归法分析其影响因素。
结果
2
临床医学专业毕业生临床能力领域得分最高(3.05±0.84),其次为职业素养领域(2.48±0.81),得分最低的是科学与学术领域(1.89±0.68)。各因子得分中排在前3名的依次是临床执业能力(3.39±0.76)、理论知识掌握情况(3.55±0.48)和医学知识掌握情况(2.98±0.81),得分最低的3个因子依次是文献检索能力(1.31±0.64)、全球健康问题(1.49±0.82)和自我提升意愿及能力(1.81±0.73)。利用多元逐步回归法分析综合能力影响因素,得出最优方程:
Y
=8.412+0.063
X
6
+0.190
X
8
+0.266
X
10
+0.031
X
11
+0.187
X
12
(
X
6
为工作单位层次,
X
8
为学习成绩排名,
X
10
为实践教学满意度,
X
11
为教学模式满意度,
X
12
为毕业后再教育满意度)。其中实践教学满意度、毕业后再教育满意度和教学模式满意度越高,学生成绩排名越高,临床毕业生的综合能力得分越高。就业层次在综合医院的毕业生,其综合能力得分要高于社区/乡镇医院等基层医院的毕业生。
结论
2
临床医学专业学生在培养的过程中应提高实践教学质量、完善教学模式,加大科学与学术领域的培养,提高基层医疗机构再教育投入力度,提高毕业生再教育满意度,从而提高临床医学专业毕业生综合能力。
Objective
2
To investigate the comprehensive ability and influencing factors of clinical medicine graduates from a medical college in Xi'an
and provide a scientific basis for improving the training model and comprehensive ability of clinical medicine students.
Methods
2
Based on the Chinese Undergraduate Medical Education Standard-Clinical Medicine Specialty (2016 Edition)
we conducted a self-designed questionnaire
the Clinical Medicine Graduate Comprehensive Ability Evaluation Questionnaire
containing 62 items in 4 dimensions
selected the clinical medicine graduates as the research objects by random sampling method
used SPSS 22.0 to make data analysis
and performed multiple linear regression to analyze its influencing factors.
Results
2
Clinical medicine graduates had the highest score in the field of clinical competence (3.05±0.84)
followed by the field of professionalism (2.48±0.81)
and the lowest score was in the field of science and academics (1.89±0.68). The top three scores of each factor were clinical practice ability (3.39±0.76)
theoretical knowledge mastery (3.55±0.48) and medical knowledge mastery (2.98±0.81). The three factors with the lowest scores were literature search ability (1.31±0.64)
global health issues (1.49±0.82) and self-improvement willingness and ability (1.81±0.73). Using the multiple stepwise regression method to analyze the influencing factors of comprehensive ability
the optimal equation was obtained:
Y
=8.412+0.063
X
6
+0.190
X
8
+0.266
X
10
+0.031
X
11
+0.187
X
12
(
X
6
working level;
X
8
academic performance ranking;
X
10
practical teaching satisfaction;
X
11
mode of teaching satisfaction;
X
12
Re-education satisfaction after graduation). Among them
the higher the practical teaching satisfaction
the satisfaction of re-education and the satisfaction of teaching mode after graduation
the higher the student's performance ranking
and the higher the comprehensive ability score of clinical graduates. Graduates whose employment level was in a general hospitals had higher comprehensive ability scores than those of grassroots hospitals such as community/township hospitals.
Conclusions
2
In the process of training clinical medicine students
we should improve the quality of practical teaching and the teaching model
increase the training of science and academic fields
increase the investment in re-education of primary medical institutions
and raise the satisfaction of graduates in education
so as to improve the clinical medicine profession comprehensive ability of graduates.
临床医学毕业生综合能力教育评价
Clinical medicine graduatesComprehensive abilityEducation evaluation
张国宾, 王平, 于心党. 高校毕业生质量调查的认识与实践[J]. 高等建筑教育, 2009, 18(5): 155-158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-2909.2009.05.040http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-2909.2009.05.040.
付卫东. 改革开放40年我国农村中小学教师队伍建设: 举措、成效及经验[J]. 教育与经济, 2018, 34(4): 22-29. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2018.04.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-4870.2018.04.003.
刘民, 钟志宏. 本科医学教育质量改进全球标准对我国医学专业认证的影响研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2016, 36(2): 165-169. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.02.002http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.02.002.
文历阳. 深化医学教育改革 促进学生自主发展[J]. 中国高教研究, 2018(5): 81.
汪秋柯, 芮碧宇, 谢雪涛, 等. 临床实习对临床医学专业学生岗位胜任力的影响[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2018, 38(5): 744-748. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.024http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.024.
王丹. 基于对分课堂教学模式的医学文献检索教学改革探索[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2020, 41(5): 392-393.
于双成. 基于医学创新能力培养的医学方法学课程群构建研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2013.
柴晶晶, 朱华栋, 刘继海, 等. 北京协和医学院八年制医学生基于实践的自主学习能力及相关因素分析[J]. 基础医学与临床,2019, 39(5): 763-768. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2019.05.031http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2019.05.031.
李燕, 冷平, 罗萍. 医学技术类人才能力型实践教学体系的构建与实践[J]. 成都中医药大学学报(教育科学版), 2013, 15(3): 45-46.
王虹, 陈琪, 朱滨海, 等. 构建以临床技能训练为核心的“5+3+X”临床医学人才培养体系的探索与实践[J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2013(4): 11-15. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-960X.2013.04.004http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-960X.2013.04.004.
张宇, 李悦, 刘晓民, 等. 临床医学专业学位研究生综合能力培养存在的问题及对策[J]. 医学与社会, 2015(11): 94-96. DOI: 10.13723/j.yxysh.2015.11.029http://dx.doi.org/10.13723/j.yxysh.2015.11.029.
殷樟凤, 朱姬莹. 课程思政对医学生职业素养培养的思考与探索[J]. 中国现代医生, 2018, 56(13): 129-133.
乔洁, 李宁波, 卫建琮. 医学院校本科生研究型教学模式的构建[J]. 基础医学教育, 2020, 22(11): 805-808. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2020.11.07http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2020.11.07.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
