Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china

Peng Hong; Pan Xue

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china

Comparative Medicine Education | 更新时间：2023-05-12

- Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china
- Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Vol. 22, Issue 4, Pages: 489-493(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.南充市中心医院/川北医学院第二临床医学院肛肠科，南充　637000
  2.重庆医科大学附属第一医院科技处，重庆　400016
- 作者简介：
  
  Pan Xue, Email: 19563582@qq.com
- 基金信息：
  
  University-Industry Collaborative Education Program(202101395068;202102647021;202102654069);The Teaching Reform Project of Southwest Medical University(ZYTS-151)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231
  CLC： R33
- Published：20 April 2023，
  
  Received：22 January 2021，
扫描看全文
彭洪, 潘雪. 奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 489-493.

Peng Hong, Pan Xue. Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(4):489-493(2023)
彭洪, 潘雪. 奥地利维也纳医科大学医学考试形式介绍及启示[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 489-493. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231.

Peng Hong, Pan Xue. Inspiration of different medical examination forms of Medical University of Vienna in Austria to medical education in china. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(4):489-493(2023) DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20210122-01231.

摘要

医学生需要具备不同层次的能力，所以需要不同的考试形式来衡量能力的高低。不同考试方法的选择对于反映所选课程的学习效果至关重要。本文主要介绍了维也纳医科大学的考试设计及其作用，以及对我国医学教育评估的启示。通过学习奥地利先进的教学评估理念和方法，可为我国医学教育评估方式改革、培养高素质医学人才提供借鉴。

Abstract

Medical students need to have different levels of ability

so various examination forms are required to measure on levels of competency. The choice of different examination methods is very important to reflect the learning effect of the selected courses. The present work describes the examination design and its functions of the Medical University of Vienna

and the enlightenment to the evaluation of higher medical education of China. Learning from the advanced teaching evaluation concepts and methods in Austria may help to promote the reform of medical education evaluation methods and cultivate high-quality medical talents in our country.

关键词

医学考试形式医学教育奥地利

Keywords

Medical examination formMedical educationAustria

references

Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356(4): 387-396. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra054784http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054784.

Norcini J, Anderson B, Bollela V, et al. Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference [J]. Med Teach, 2011, 33(3): 206-214. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559.

Jünger J. Competence-based assessment in the national licensing examination in Germany [J]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz, 2018, 61(2): 171-177. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-017-2668-9http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-017-2668-9.

Fischer MR, Holzer M, Jünger J. Exams at medical faculties- quality, responsibility and perspectives [J]. GMS Z Med Ausbild, 2010, 27(5): Doc66. DOI: 10.3205/zma000703http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000703.

Kazubke E, Schüttpelz-Brauns K. Review of multiple-choice-questions and group performance—a comparison of face-to-face and virtual groups with and without facilitation [J]. GMS Z Med Ausbild, 2010, 27(5): Doc68. DOI: 10.3205/zma000705http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000705.

Daniels VJ, Pugh D. Twelve tips for developing an OSCE that measures what You want [J]. Med Teach, 2018, 40(12): 1208-1213. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1390214http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1390214.

Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J, et al. Does quantity ensure quality? Standardized OSCE-stations for outcome-oriented evaluationof practical skills at different medical faculties [J]. Anat Anzeiger Off Organ Anat Gesellschaft, 2017, 212: 55-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.03.006.

Schleicher I, Leitner K, Juenger J, et al. Examiner effect on the objective structured clinical exam—a study at five medical schools [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2017, 17(1): 71. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-017-0908-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0908-1.

Lörwald AC, Lahner FM, Greif R, et al. Factors influencing the educational impact of Mini-CEX and DOPS: a qualitative synthesis [J]. Med Teach, 2018, 40(4): 414-420. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1408901.

Mortaz Hejri S, Jalili M, Shirazi M, et al. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: protocol for a systematic review [J]. Syst Rev, 2017, 6(1): 146. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0539-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0539-y.

Barrett A, Galvin R, Steinert Y, et al. A BEME (Best Evidence in Medical Education) review of the use of workplace-based assessment in identifying and remediating underperformance among postgraduate medical trainees: BEME Guide No. 43 [J]. Med Teach, 2016, 38(12): 1188-1198. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215413http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1215413.

Kogan JR, Hatala R, Hauer KE, et al. Guidelines: The do's, don'ts and don't knows of direct observation of clinical skills in medical education [J]. Perspect Med Educ, 2017, 6(5): 286-305. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0376-7.

Levine RB, Cayea D. Defining and assessing the 21st-century physician in training [J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2015, 30(9): 1241-1242. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3427-yhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3427-y.

Hochlehnert A, Brass K, Moeltner A, et al. Does medical students' preference of test format (computer-based vs. paper-based) have an influence on performance? [J]. BMC Med Educ, 2011, 11: 89. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-89http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-89.

Raupach T, Brown J, Anders S, et al. Summative assessments are more powerful drivers of student learning than resource intensive teaching formats [J]. BMC Med, 2013, 11: 61. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-61http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-61.

Bennett CR, Mawhood N, Platt MJ. The impact of medical school assessment on preparedness for practice [J]. Med Teach, 2019, 41(1): 112-114. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1425796http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1425796.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Study on the cognition, learning habit and learning effect of Clinical Epidemiology among different types of postgraduates

Opportunities and challenges of pediatric medical education in the new era of China

Health systems science as the third pillar of medical education: global standards and international progress

Practice and thinking of developing quality courses for standardized residency training in ultrasound

Research advances in the application of entrustable professional activities in competency-oriented medical education in colleges and universities

Related Author

He Yao

Li Xuehang

Liu Shaohua

Han Ke

Jia Wangping

Wang Jianhua

Wang Shengshu

Song Yang

Related Institution

Department of Military Medical Technology Support, School of Non-commissioned Officer, Army Medical University

Department of healthcare, Agency for Offices Administration, Central Military Commission, People's Republic of China

Graduate school, Chinese PLA General Hospital & Chinese PLA Medical Academy

Institute of Geriatrics, Second Medical Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Aging and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital & Chinese PLA Medical Academy

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine/National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders

⁰