昆明医科大学第一附属医院护理教研室, 昆明 650032
Liang Hongmin, Email: KMlianghongmin@163.com
Published:20 April 2023,
Received:11 December 2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
李娜, 罕若林, 宋云华, 等. 基于BOPPPS教学模型的护理本科内科实习带教方法研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 636-640.
Li Na, Han Ruolin, Song Yunhua, et al. Exploration of undergraduate practice teaching method for nursing internal medicine based on BOPPPS teaching model. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(4):636-640(2023)
李娜, 罕若林, 宋云华, 等. 基于BOPPPS教学模型的护理本科内科实习带教方法研究[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(4): 636-640. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201211-01263.
Li Na, Han Ruolin, Song Yunhua, et al. Exploration of undergraduate practice teaching method for nursing internal medicine based on BOPPPS teaching model. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(4):636-640(2023) DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20201211-01263.
目的
2
探讨运用BOPPPS[引入(B-bridge in)、目标(O-objective)、前测(P-pre-assessment)、参与式学习(P-participatory learning)、后测(P-post-assessment)、总结(S-summary)]教学模型进行护理本科内科实习带教的可行性。
方法
2
选取昆明医科大学护理本科专业实习生73人作为研究对象,分为试验组(30人)和对照组(43人)。试验组采用基于BOPPPS模式的实习带教方法,对照组采用传统教学方法。通过问卷收集学生评价。实习成绩采用题库抽题考核方式,评价学生护理综合推理能力、整体护理技巧能力、临床护理评估能力。教师评价学生实习过程中案例学习参与度和问题解决参与度。采用SPSS 20.0进行
t
检验。
结果
2
学生对实习过程的评价,试验组得分(86.81±2.85)优于对照组得分(82.61±3.82)(
P
<
0.001)。临床思维综合推理、整体护理评估能力评价,试验组优于对照组(
P
<
0.001)。教师评价,试验组优于对照组(
P
<
0.05)。总体效果试验组(20.60±1.73)优于对照组(17.84±1.70)(
P
<
0.001)。
结论
2
基于BOPPPS教学模型的实习带教方法,有助于教师依据护理内科学教学总体目标,开展和示范以症状为核心的整体护理教学,优化时间安排和知识结构,提高实习效率,促进学生整体护理思维模式建立。
Objective
2
To explore the feasibility of applying BOPPPS (B-bridge in
O-objective
P-pre-assessment
P-participatory learning
P-post-assessment
S-summary) course design mode in the teaching of internal medicine practice for nursing undergraduates.
Methods
2
A total of 73 nursing interns of Kunming Medical University were selected as subjects and divided into the experimental group (
n
=30) and the control group (
n
=43). The experimental group adopted the practice teaching method based on BOPPPS model
while the control group adopted the traditional teaching method. Students' evaluation was collected by questionnaire. The students' comprehensive reasoning ability
holistic nursing skills ability and clinical nursing evaluation ability were evaluated by taking out questions from the question bank. And the results of teachers' evaluation on the participation of case study and problem solving in the process of students' internship were collected. SPSS 20.0 was used for
t
-test.
Results
2
The students' evaluation of the practice process in the experimental group (86.81±2.85) was significantly better than that in the control group (82.61±3.82) (
P
<
0.001). The experimental group was significantly better than the control group in comprehensive reasoning of clinical thinking and assessment of holistic nursing ability (
P
<
0.001). Teachers' evaluation in the experimental group was better than that in the control group (
P
<
0.05). The overall effect of the experimental group (20.60±1.73) was significantly better than that of the control group (17.84±1.70) (
P
<
0.001).
Conclusion
2
BOPPPS mode is helpful for teachers to carry out and demonstrate holistic nursing teaching with symptoms as the core according to the overall teaching objectives of nursing internal medicine
optimize the time arrangement and knowledge structure
improve the practice efficiency
and promote the establishment of holistic nursing thinking mode of students.
BOPPPS教学模型护理本科实习
BOPPPS teaching modelUndergraduate nursingInternship
毛婷, 李娟, 张雯, 等. 基于知识内化的教学策略在内科护理学中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2019, 16(9): 696-699. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2019.09.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2019.09.014.
孙丽梅, 王金玄, 金瑞华, 等. 首要教学原理在内科护理学实践课程中的应用研究[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(12): 2189-2193. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.12.026http://dx.doi.org/10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.12.026.
董晓宇. BOPPPS模型框架下同伴互助教学法(PAL)的课程设计与评价[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9(12): 20-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.12.009http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.12.009.
Yang YJ, You J, Wu JR, et al. The Effect of microteaching teaching combined with the BOPPPS model on dental materials education for predoctoral dental students [J]. J Dent Educ, 2019, 83(5): 567-574. DOI: 10.21815/Jde.019.068http://dx.doi.org/10.21815/Jde.019.068.
Gerbase MW, Germond M, Nendaz MR, et al. When the evaluated becomes evaluator: what can we learn from students' experiences during clerkships? [J]. Acad Med, 2009, 84(7): 877-885. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a8171ehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a8171e.
郑转珍, 董春霞, 马艳萍, 等. 内科学教学改革分析与探讨[J]. 基础医学教育, 2016, 18(2): 117-120. DOI: 10.13754/j.issn.2095-http://dx.doi.org/10.13754/j.issn.2095-1450.2016.02.09.
应亮. BOPPPS教学模式在医学伦理学教学中的运用[J]. 中国医学伦理学, 2017, 30(3): 352-354, 358. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2017.03.23http://dx.doi.org/10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2017.03.23.
Celma-Vicente M, López-Morales M, Cano Caballero-Gálvez MD. Analysis of clinical practices in the Nursing Degree: vision of tutors and students [J]. Enfermería Clínica Engl Ed, 2019, 29(5): 271-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcle.2018.04.006http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2018.04.006.
王继年, 王珩, 陈明卫, 等. 互联网+BOPPPS教学模型下临床医学专业实践教学体系的建立与实践[J]. 医学教育管理, 2020, 6(4): 325-329. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2020.04.004http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2020.04.004.
Tuomikoski AM, Ruotsalainen H, Mikkonen K, et al. Nurses' experiences of their competence at mentoring nursing students during clinical practice: a systematic review of qualitative studies [J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 85: 104258. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104258http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104258.
Immonen K, Oikarainen A, Tomietto M, et al. Assessment of nursing students' competence in clinical practice: a systematic review of reviews [J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2019, 100: 103414. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103414.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621
