Construction and reflection of mixed evaluation system of physiology

Mai Wenli; Xu Ce; Gao Ying; Zhou Yuanyuan; Liu Xinghai; Zhang Tuanxiao; Jing Huae; Luo Jiewei

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200809-01174

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Construction and reflection of mixed evaluation system of physiology

Teaching Reform | 更新时间：2023-04-14

- Construction and reflection of mixed evaluation system of physiology
- Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research Vol. 22, Issue 2, Pages: 208-211(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.川北医学院生理教研室，南充 637000
  2.川北医学院化学教研室，南充 637000
- 作者简介：
  
  Luo Jiewei, Email: 420991160@qq.com
- 基金信息：
  
  Educational Reform Project of North Sichuan Medical College(201837004);Ministry of Education Industry-University Cooperation Collaborative Education Project(201801201004);Sichuan Education Development Center Project(CJF17017)
- DOI：10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200809-01174
  CLC： R-05
- Published：20 February 2023，
  
  Received：09 August 2020，
扫描看全文
买文丽, 徐策, 高瑛, 等. 生理学混合式评价体系的构建及思考[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(2): 208-211.

Mai Wenli, Xu Ce, Gao Ying, et al. Construction and reflection of mixed evaluation system of physiology. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(2):208-211(2023)
买文丽, 徐策, 高瑛, 等. 生理学混合式评价体系的构建及思考[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2023, 22(2): 208-211. DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn英文已校 202006097买文丽YYT.

Mai Wenli, Xu Ce, Gao Ying, et al. Construction and reflection of mixed evaluation system of physiology. [J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research 22(2):208-211(2023) DOI： 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200809-01174.

摘要

混合式评价体系以网络平台为载体，构建线上—线下、个人—团队之间跨时空的、动态的评价模式。生理学通过两年的混合式评价体系的运行，系统中过程性评价和终结性评价表现出很好的相关性，学生的学习能力和学习效果与评价结果表现出一致性。实践证明，混合式评价体系不仅优化了传统的评价体系，而且充分拓展了形成性评价的五原则。但在体现网络平台优势的同时，也暴露出了网络平台监督不足的缺陷，应对其进行改进，进一步完善生理学混合式评价体系。

Abstract

The mixed evaluation system uses the network platform as a carrier to construct a dynamic evaluation model that spans time and space between online and offline

between individuals and teams. Mixed evaluation system of physiology was performed for two years

and the process evaluation and the summative evaluation in the mixed evaluation system showed a good correlation

and the students' learning ability and learning effect showed consistency with the evaluation results. Practice has proved that the mixed evaluation system not only optimizes the traditional evaluation system

but also fully expands the five principles of formative evaluation; however

while reflecting the advantages of the network platform

it also exposes the defects of insufficient supervision of the network platform. Thus

we should further improve the mixed evaluation system of physiology.

关键词

混合式评价体系线上线下过程性评价终结性评价

Keywords

Mixed evaluation systemOnline and offlineProcess evaluationSummative evaluation

references

张生. 混合式学习环境下基于学习活动的形成性评价的理论与实践[D]. 长春：东北师范大学， 2008.

苏命峰，黄会雄，宁和南. 云计算环境下混合式学习评价体系构建[J]. 科学大众（科学教育）， 2016（9）： 143， 192. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3315.2016.09.124http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3315.2016.09.124.

钱袁萍. 混合式教学评价机制研究：以省在线开放课程机械工程力学为例[J]. 沙洲职业工学院学报， 2018， 21（3）： 13-16. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8429.2018.03.004http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8429.2018.03.004.

赵国栋，原帅. 混合式学习的学生满意度及影响因素研究：以北京大学教学网为例[J]. 中国远程教育（综合版）， 2010（6）： 32-38， 79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-458X.2010.06.014http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-458X.2010.06.014.

赵建华，李克东. 协作学习及其协作学习模式[J]. 中国电化教育， 2000（10）： 5-6.

李晓文. 翻转课堂的学生满意度评价研究[J]. 高教发展与评估， 2015， 31（3）： 98-105, 116. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2015.03.013http://dx.doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.1672-8742.2015.03.013.

李逢庆. 混合式教学的理论基础与教学设计[J]. 现代教育技术， 2016， 26（9）： 18-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2016.09.003http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-8097.2016.09.003.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰