ZHANG Chunmei, PENG Lin. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of liver epithelioid angiomyolipoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(12):941-943(2020)
ZHANG Chunmei, PENG Lin. Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of liver epithelioid angiomyolipoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(12):941-943(2020) DOI: 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2020.12.025.
Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of liver epithelioid angiomyolipoma and hepatocellular carcinoma
Objective To explore the clinical application value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)in thedifferential diagnosis of liver epithelioid angiomyolipoma(EAML)and hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsThe conventionalultrasound and CEUS data of 40 patients with liver EAML and 40 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were analyzedretrospectively.Qualitative and quantitative analysis of images were carried out by Qontrast software.The degree of enhancement
arrival time
peak intensity
peak time
enhancement slope and the start time of fading of the two groups were compared.ResultsConventional ultrasound examination showed that the echo types and the number of lesions between the two groupswere significantly differen(tall P<0.05).There were no significant differences in the intensity of blood flow signal
the location oflesions and the edge of lesions between the two groups.Compared with hepatocellular carcinoma group
the contrast-enhancedultrasound examination showed that liver EAML group had more cases of centripetal enhancement and less cases of delayedphase enhancement(both P<0.05).There was no significant difference between the two groups in the enhancement degree ofarterial phase and portal phase.Compared with the hepatocellular carcinoma group
the peak intensity of liver EAML group washigher
while the peak time and the beginning time of regression were shorter(all P<0.05).There was no significant difference inenhancement slope and arrival time between the two groups.ConclusionThere are different blood perfusion characteristicsbetween liver EAML and hepatocellular carcinoma.CEUS is valuable for the differential diagnosis of the two diseases.
Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system in high-risk patients with alpha-fetoprotein- negative hepatocellular carcinoma
CEUS 5-point method and CEUS predictive models assessment of different sizes BI-RADS 4 of breast lesions comparative research
Related Author
郑丽丽
任新平
詹维伟
冯梅晶
李军建
黄哲
周萍萍
吴晓贝
Related Institution
江苏省无锡市新吴区新瑞医院 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院无锡分院超声科
Department of Ultrasound,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College ,Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Department of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University
Shanghai General Hospital
the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University