Value of combined conventional ultrasound,contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions

ZHENG Xiaoxue; TANG Min; WEI Guoli; TANG Yan; DAI Jia’ni; SONG Jianqiong

doi:10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2020.03.009

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Value of combined conventional ultrasound,contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions

更新时间：2021-10-08

- Value of combined conventional ultrasound,contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions
- Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine Vol. 22, Issue 3, Pages: 184-188(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  四川省达州市中心医院住院部功能科
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2020.03.009
  CLC： R734.2;R445.1
- Published：2020，
扫描看全文
[1]郑小雪,唐敏,魏国李,唐燕,代佳霓,宋建琼.常规超声、超声造影及肿瘤标志物联合评分在肺周围型病变良恶性诊断中的价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2020,22(03):184-188.

ZHENG Xiaoxue, TANG Min, WEI Guoli, et al. Value of combined conventional ultrasound,contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(3):184-188(2020)
[1]郑小雪,唐敏,魏国李,唐燕,代佳霓,宋建琼.常规超声、超声造影及肿瘤标志物联合评分在肺周围型病变良恶性诊断中的价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2020,22(03):184-188. DOI： 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2020.03.009.

ZHENG Xiaoxue, TANG Min, WEI Guoli, et al. Value of combined conventional ultrasound,contrast-enhanced ultrasound and tumor markers in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions. [J]. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine 22(3):184-188(2020) DOI： 10.16245/j.cnki.issn1008-6978.2020.03.009.

摘要

目的探讨常规超声、超声造影及肿瘤标志物联合评分在肺周围型病变良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法选取我院经穿刺活检或术后病理检查确诊的肺周围型病变患者76例

其中良性30例

恶性46例

比较良、恶性病变常规超声、超声造影及肿瘤标记物单一检查方法评分及三种检查方法联合评分;绘制受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线

计算各评分对应的曲线下面积、截断值、诊断敏感性及特异性

并对其进行比较。结果肺周围型良、恶性病变常规超声、超声造影及肿瘤标记物联合评分分别为（6.90±2.27）分、（11.93±2.29）分

二者比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;ROC曲线显示常规超声、超声造影、肿瘤标记物单一检查方法评分及三种检查方法联合评分的截断值分别为1.5分、6.5分、1.5分及8.5分时

诊断肺周围型恶性病变的曲线下面积分别为0.801、0.887、0.754及0.921

对应的敏感性和特异性分别为89.1%、65.6%

71.7%、93.1%和76.1%、65.5%

95.7%、76.7%

其中三种检查方法联合评分的ROC曲线下面积、诊断敏感性均高于常规超声、超声造影、肿瘤标记物单一检查方法评分。结论常规超声、超声造影及肿瘤标志物联合评分对肺周围型病变良恶性鉴别诊断有较高价值。

Abstract

Objective To explore the application value of combined conventional ultrasound

contrast-enhancedultrasound（CEUS）and tumor markers in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions.MethodsSeventy-six patients with histopathologically confirmed peripheral pulmonary lesions（30 benign and 46 malignant）were enrolled in this study.Conventional ultrasound

CEUS and tumor marker detection were performed on each patients.Thescores of three methods and the combination of three methods were recorded and compared. Area under receiver operatingcharacteristic（ROC）curve was drawn

the cutoff value of the score

the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were calculated andcompared.ResultsThe combined score of malignant lesions was significantly higher than that of benign lesions（11.93±2.29 vs.6.90±2.27

P<0.05）.The ROC curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of conventional ultrasound score

CEUS score

tumormarkers score and the combined score were 1.5

6.5

1.5 and 8.5

respectively.The sensitivity and specificity were 89.1%

65.6%

71.7%

93.1% and 76.1%

65.5%

95.7%

76.7%

respectively.The area under the curve and diagnostic sensitivity of the combinedscores were significantly higher than those of any single method score.ConclusionThe combined score of conventional ultrasound

CEUS and tumor marker are of high value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant peripheral pulmonary lesions.

关键词

超声检查造影剂肿瘤标记物肺周围型病变良恶性

Keywords

UltrasonographyContrast agentTumor markersPeripheral pulmonary lesionsbenign and malignant

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Application of contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system in high-risk patients with alpha-fetoprotein- negative hepatocellular carcinoma

CEUS 5-point method and CEUS predictive models assessment of different sizes BI-RADS 4 of breast lesions comparative research

Related Author

郑丽丽

任新平

詹维伟

冯梅晶

李军建

黄哲

周萍萍

吴晓贝

Related Institution

江苏省无锡市新吴区新瑞医院上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院无锡分院超声科

Department of Ultrasound,Tongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College ,Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Department of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University Army Medical University

Shanghai General Hospital

the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University

⁰