Systematic Review of Topical Anesthesia Effects of Lidocaine,Oxybuprocaine and Tetracaine in Electronic Laryngoscopy

SUN Hong; GU Jifeng; LI Ling; ZHANG Xiuwen; BU Fengjiao; HUANG Taomin

doi:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.11.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Systematic Review of Topical Anesthesia Effects of Lidocaine,Oxybuprocaine and Tetracaine in Electronic Laryngoscopy

更新时间：2022-10-08

- Systematic Review of Topical Anesthesia Effects of Lidocaine,Oxybuprocaine and Tetracaine in Electronic Laryngoscopy
- Vol. 21, Issue 11, Pages: 1377-1382(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院药剂科
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.11.022
  CLC： R614
- Published：2021，
扫描看全文
SUN Hong, GU Jifeng, LI Ling, et al. Systematic Review of Topical Anesthesia Effects of Lidocaine,Oxybuprocaine and Tetracaine in Electronic Laryngoscopy. [J]. 21(11):1377-1382(2021)
DOI：

SUN Hong, GU Jifeng, LI Ling, et al. Systematic Review of Topical Anesthesia Effects of Lidocaine,Oxybuprocaine and Tetracaine in Electronic Laryngoscopy. [J]. 21(11):1377-1382(2021) DOI： 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.11.022.

摘要

目的:基于荟萃分析(Meta分析)方法

比较利多卡因、奥布卡因与丁卡因在喉镜诊疗中的表面麻醉效果。方法:系统检索Pub Med、Embase、the Cochrane Library、中国知网和万方数据库

筛选利多卡因或奥布卡因与1%丁卡因在喉镜诊疗中表面麻醉效果比较的随机对照试验

检索时间跨度为自建库至2020年12月。由2名研究者独立、严格进行纳入研究的质量评价和资料提取

采用Rev Man 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入13篇文献

共4 303例患者。Meta分析结果显示

2%利多卡因超声雾化表面麻醉的显效率、总有效率明显优于1%丁卡因喷雾(显效率:RR=1.37

95%CI=1.28～1.46

P <0.000 01;总有效率:RR=1.09

95%CI=1.06～1.13

P <0.000 01)

差异均有统计学意义; 2%利多卡因超声雾化表面麻醉的显效率、总有效率与1%丁卡因超声雾化相当(显效率:RR=1.00

95%CI=0.96～1.03

P=0.94;总有效率:RR=1.00

95%CI=0.98～1.02

P=0.76)

差异均无统计学意义; 0.4%奥布卡因滴眼液表面麻醉在显效率方面具有优于1%丁卡因的趋势(RR=1.23

95%CI=0.87～1.73

P=0.25);奥布卡因凝胶表面麻醉的显效率优于1%丁卡因(RR=1.16

95%CI=1.00～1.34

P=0.05); 0.4%奥布卡因滴眼液、奥布卡因凝胶表面麻醉的总有效率均与1%丁卡因相当(0.4%奥布卡因滴眼液:RR=1.01

95%CI=0.99～1.04

P=0.32;奥布卡因凝胶:RR=1.06

95%CI=0.88～1.27

P=0.53)

差异均无统计学意义;奥布卡因凝胶的药品不良反应发生率明显低于1%丁卡因

差异有统计学意义(RR=0.10

95%CI=0.01～0.77

P=0.03)。结论:在喉镜诊疗中

采用2%利多卡因超声雾化、0.4%奥布卡因滴眼液及奥布卡因凝胶进行表面麻醉

其显效率、总有效率均稍优于或者相当于1%丁卡因;另外

奥布卡因凝胶比1%丁卡因表面麻醉更安全。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the topical anesthesia effects of lidocaine

oxybuprocaine and tetracaine in electronic laryngoscopy. METHODS: Pub Med

Embase

the Cochrane Library

CNKI and Wanfang database were retrieved to extract the randomized clinical trials of the topical anesthesia effects of lidocaine or oxybuprocaine and 1% tetracaine in the electronic laryngoscopy. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to Dec. 2020. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria

and evaluated the methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed by using Rev Man 5. 3 software. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were collected

including 4303 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that the significant effective rate and total effective rate of 2% lidocaine ultrasonic atomization topical anesthesia were significantly better than 1% tetracaine spray（ significant effective rate: RR =1. 37

95% CI =1. 28-1. 46

P <0. 000 01; total effective rate: RR = 1. 09

95% CI = 1. 06-1. 13

P < 0. 000 01）

the differences were statistically significant. The significant effective rate and total effective rate of 2% lidocaine ultrasonic atomization topical anesthesia were similar to 1% tetracaine ultrasonic atomization（ significant effective rate: RR = 1. 00

95% CI = 0. 96-1. 03

P = 0. 94; total effective rate: RR =1. 00

95% CI =0. 98-1. 02

P =0. 76）

the difference was not statistically significant. The significant effective rate of topical anesthesia with 0. 4% oxybuprocaine eye drops was better than that with 1% tetracaine（ RR = 1. 23

95% CI =0. 87-1. 73

P =0. 25）. The significant effective rate of topical anesthesia with oxybuprocaine gel was better than 1% tetracaine（ RR =1. 16

95%CI =1. 00-1. 34

P =0. 05）. The total effective rates of topical anesthesia in 0. 4% oxybuprocaine eye drops and oxybuprocaine gel were similar to that of 1% tetracaine（ 0. 4% oxybuprocaine eye drops: RR = 1. 01

95% CI = 0. 99-1. 04

P =0. 32; oxybuprocaine gel: RR =1. 06

95% CI =0. 88-1. 27

P =0. 53）

with no statistically significant difference. The incidence of adverse drug reactions of obucaine gel was significantly lower than that of 1% tetracaine

and the difference was statistically significant（ RR =0. 10

95% CI =0. 01-0. 77

P =0. 03）. CONCLUSIONS: The significant effective rate and total effective rate of2% lidocaine ultrasonic atomization

0. 4% oxybuprocaine eye drops and oxybuprocaine gel are slightly superior or equivalent to1% tetracaine in topical anesthesia effects of the electronic laryngoscopy. In addition

oxybuprocaine gel is safer than 1%tetracaine in topical anesthesia.

关键词

利多卡因奥布卡因丁卡因喉镜Meta分析

Keywords

LidocaineOxybuprocaineTetracaineLaryngoscopyMeta-analysis

references

查看原文

Views

242

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Systematic Review of Huisheng Oral Liquid on Coagulation Function, Efficacy and Safety of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of Dantian Jiangzhi Pills Combined with Statins in the Treatment of Hyperlipidemia

Systematic Review of Runzao Zhiyang Capsules Combined with Antihistamine in the Treatment of Chronic Urticaria

Systematic Review of Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Formula Granules of Liangfu Pill in the Treatment of Epigastric Pain

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor Combined with Rosuvastatin Therapy in the Treatment of Unstable Angina Pectoris

Related Author

ZHANG Jinhua

TIAN Yuan

YANG Xiaoping

ZHANG Yi

LIU Wei

LI Xingxing

FAN Zongjing

CUI Jie

Related Institution

Dept. of Oncology, Jingmen First People’s Hospital

Traditional Chinese Medicine Phenomics Research Center, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Southwest Medical University

Dept. of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Seventh People’s Hospital

Dept. of Internal Medicine of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital

Second School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

⁰