Comparison of Efficacy and Economy of Cefotaxime Sodium Sulbactam Sodium Combined with Azithromycin and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-10-08
|
Comparison of Efficacy and Economy of Cefotaxime Sodium Sulbactam Sodium Combined with Azithromycin and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia
JIE Qiong, WAN Meng, ZHU Yubing. Comparison of Efficacy and Economy of Cefotaxime Sodium Sulbactam Sodium Combined with Azithromycin and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia. [J]. 21(4):451-454(2021)
JIE Qiong, WAN Meng, ZHU Yubing. Comparison of Efficacy and Economy of Cefotaxime Sodium Sulbactam Sodium Combined with Azithromycin and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia. [J]. 21(4):451-454(2021) DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.04.016.
Comparison of Efficacy and Economy of Cefotaxime Sodium Sulbactam Sodium Combined with Azithromycin and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia
OBJECTIVE: To probe into the efficacy and economy of cefotaxime sodium sulbactam sodium combined with azithromycin and moxifloxacin in the treatment of community acquired pneumonia( CAP)
so as to provide suggestions and references for the clinical treatment of CAP. METHODS: Prospective study method was used to collect the data of hospitalized patients with CAP in Nanjing First Hospital
Nanjing Medical University from Jan. to Jun.2019. The observation group( n = 68) was treated with cefotaxime sodium sulbactam sodium and azithromycin
while the control group( n = 82) received moxifloxacin. The treatment effects
adverse drug reactions and cost of two groups were observed
and the efficacy and economy were evaluated. RESULTS:( 1) There were no statistically significant differences in gender
smoking status
use of antibiotics in the past 7 d and types of medical insurance between two groups( P > 0. 05)
but there were statistically significant differences in age
drinking status and chronic diseases( P< 0. 05).( 2) In terms of clinical efficacy
the effective rate was 91. 2%( 62/68) in the observation group and91. 5%( 75/82) in the control group
there was no significant difference between two groups( P > 0. 05). Logistic multiple regression model showed that group
gender
age
smoking status
drinking status
chronic disease and use of antibiotics win the past 7 d had no significant effect on the efficacy.( 3) In terms of length of stay
the length of stay in the observation group was 9( 8-10) d
and that in the control group was 7( 6-8) d
there was statistically significant difference between two groups( P < 0. 05).( 4) The incidence of adverse drug reactions in the observation group was 16. 2%( 11/68)
and that in the control group was 4. 9%( 4/82)
with statistically significant difference( P < 0. 05).( 5) The total cost of the observation group was 13 608. 76 yuan
and that of the control group was8 399. 53 yuan
the total cost of the control group was significantly lower than that of the observation group
with statistically significant difference( P < 0. 05).( 6) Due to there was no statistically significant difference in the effective rate between two groups( P > 0. 05)
the minimum cost analysis method was used to directly compare the total cost of two groups for economic evaluation
and the results showed that the control group was more economical.CONCLUSIONS: Cefotaxime sodium sulbactam sodium combined with azithromycin and moxifloxacin is comparable in the treatment of CAP
but moxifloxacin is more cost-effective.
关键词
社区获得性肺炎头孢噻肟钠舒巴坦钠莫西沙星疗效及经济性
Keywords
Community acquired pneumoniaCefotaxime sodium sulbactam sodiumMoxifloxacinEfficacy and economy
Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Whole Process of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Treatment for 20 Patients with COVID-19
Related Author
陈灵
柳芳
夏杨
宋红艳
夏敬胜
卢江
陈永刚
Related Institution
Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University
Dept. of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital