Comparative Study on Safety and Vascular Benefits of Liraglutide and Glimepiride in Patients with Inadequately Glycemic Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Insulin Pump
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-10-08
|
Comparative Study on Safety and Vascular Benefits of Liraglutide and Glimepiride in Patients with Inadequately Glycemic Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Insulin Pump
ZHAO Zhengli, FENG Yujun, GENG Jianlin, et al. Comparative Study on Safety and Vascular Benefits of Liraglutide and Glimepiride in Patients with Inadequately Glycemic Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Insulin Pump. [J]. 21(4):428-431(2021)
ZHAO Zhengli, FENG Yujun, GENG Jianlin, et al. Comparative Study on Safety and Vascular Benefits of Liraglutide and Glimepiride in Patients with Inadequately Glycemic Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Insulin Pump. [J]. 21(4):428-431(2021) DOI: 10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2021.04.011.
Comparative Study on Safety and Vascular Benefits of Liraglutide and Glimepiride in Patients with Inadequately Glycemic Controlled Type 2 Diabetes with Insulin Pump
研究组患者给予利拉鲁肽治疗。记录两组患者治疗前、治疗3个月后外周血生化指标[糖化血红蛋白(Hb A1c)、空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、甘油三酯(TG)、总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(Lp-PLA2)及超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)]、胰岛素相关指标[空腹胰岛素(FINS)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMAIR)]、肾功能指标[血尿酸(SUA)、肌酐(SCr)、尿蛋白排泄率(UAER)及尿微量白蛋白/尿肌酸肝(ACR)]水平
OBJECTIVE: To probe into the effects of liraglutide and glimepiride in the treatment of patients with inadequately glycemic controlled type 2 diabetes with insulin pump and its adverse drug reactions. METHODS: Totally166 patients with type 2 diabetes admitted into Hengshui People’s Hospital from Aug. 2018 to Aug. 2020 were extracted
after 7 d of continuous treatment with subcutaneous insulin pump( insulin dosage > 0. 7 IU/kg)
the blood glucose was still not up to standard. All patients were divided into the research group( n = 84) and the control group( n = 82) via the random number table. The control group was treated with glimepiride
while the research group received liraglutide. Peripheral blood biochemical indicators [glycated hemoglobin( HbA1 c)
fasting blood glucose( FBG)
2 h postprandial blood glucose( 2 h PG)
triglycerides( TG)
total cholesterol( TC)
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol( HDL-C)
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol( LDL-C)
lipoprotein-related phospholipase A2( Lp-PLA2) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein( hs-CRP) ]
homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance( HOMA-IR) ]
renal function indicators [serum uric acid( SUA)
creatinine( SCr)
urinary protein excretion rate( UAER) and urine microalbumin/urinary creatine liver( ACR) ]and vascular function of both lower limbs [intravascular median membrane thickness( IMT)
peak systolic velocity( PSV)and stenosis rate] and adverse drugs reactions of two groups were recorded before treatment and after treatment of3 months. RESULTS: After treatment of 3 months
the levels of HbA1 c
FBG
2 h PG
TG
TC
LDL-C
Lp-PLA2 and hs-CRP in two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment
while the levels of HDL-C were significantly higher than those before treatment; compared with the control group
the levels of HbA1 c
FBG
2 hPG
TG
TC
LDL-C
Lp-PLA2
hs-CRP and other biochemical indicators in the research group decreased significantly
while the levels of HDL-C increased significantly
with statistically significant difference( P < 0. 05). After treatment of 3 months
the levels of FINS
HOMA-IR and other indicators in two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment
and the levels of FINS and HOMA-IR in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group
and the differences were statistically significant( P < 0. 05). After treatment of 3 months
the levels of renal function indicators such as UAER
SCr
SUA and ACR
and vascular function indicators such as IMT
PSV and stenosis rate of two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment; and the levels of the above renal function indicators and vascular function indicators of the research group were significantly lower than those of the control group
the differences were statistically significant( P < 0. 05). There were no severe adverse drug reactions in two groups after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of insulin pump combined with liraglutide is better than glimepiride in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Liraglutide has a more significant effect on blood glucose
Effects of Dapagliflozin Combined with Liraglutide on Inflammatory Factors, Glucolipid Metabolism and Liver Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Combined with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Clinical Study of Empagliflozin Combined with Insulin Aspart in the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled by Insulin Alone
Centennial Development of Insulin
Process of Vitamin B12 Deficiency in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Induced by Metformin
Distribution of Intestinal Flora in Overweight Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Intervention Effect of Liraglutide Combined with Metformin
Related Author
LYU Zhongmei
WANG Deqin
CHU Yang
HUANG Zichong
DAI Yuelong
ZHAO Guishi
SUN Zhongshi
LIU Wanting
Related Institution
Dept.of Nephroendocrinology, Hai’an Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University
Dept.of Medicine,Hospital of China People’s Police University
Dept.of Pharmacy,Hospital of China People’s Police University
Dept.of Pharmacy,the Sixth Medical Center,General Hospital of PLA