Ren Danyang, Yang Yanming, Tu Caixia, et al. Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metabolic Disordersin Children. [J]. 30(2):44-50(2024)
DOI:
Ren Danyang, Yang Yanming, Tu Caixia, et al. Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metabolic Disordersin Children. [J]. 30(2):44-50(2024) DOI: 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2024.02.012.
Systematic Review on Efficacy and Safety of Zoledronic Acid in the Treatment of Bone Metabolic Disordersin Children
P =0. 55)比较差异无统计学意义。试验组与对照组在神经系统、消化系统、一般病情和用药部位及骨骼和结缔组织的不良事件 发生率相当;唑来膦酸与其他双膦酸盐在神经系统、消化系统、骨骼肌和结缔组织及骨折的不良事件发生率相当。试验组患儿 严重不良事件发生率与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(RR=2. 59
95%CI 0. 54~12. 50
P =0. 24)。结论:唑来膦酸可有效治疗 儿童骨代谢疾病;唑来膦酸与安慰剂、其他双膦酸盐药物的总体不良事件发生率、严重不良事件发生率相当
尤其是在神经系 统、消化系统及骨骼和结缔组织中的不良事件发生率相当。
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metabolic diseases in children. Methods: PubMed
the Cochrane Library
EMBase
CNKI
VIP
Wanfang database
Clinical Trials
Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials
and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were retrieved
the retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to Dec. 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCT)
case-control studies
case series studies and case reports related to zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metabolic disorders were collected. Quality assessments for RCT
case series studies and case reports were performed by using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment and the Australian JBI Quality Assessment
respectively. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Rev Man 5.3 software for RCT
while descriptive analysis was employed for other study types. Results: A total of 16 studies were enrolled
including 4 RCT
2 case series studies
and 10 case reports. No cohort studies or case-control studies specifically related to children were identified. Meta-analysis results indicated a statistically significant difference in the lumbar spine bone density score of efficacy outcome measure between the zoledronic acid group and the control group (MD=0.45
95% CI from 0.06 to 0.84
P=0.02). Regarding safety outcomes
no statistically significant differences were observed between the zoledronic acid group and the placebo group (RR=1.14
95% CI from 0.82 to 1.60
P=0.44) or other bisphosphonates group (pamidronate
alendronate
RR=1.33
95% CI from 0.53 to 3.35
P=0.55). The incidence of adverse events in the nervous system
digestive system
general condition
administration site and skeleton and connective tissue was comparable between the experimental group and the control group. Similarly
the incidence of adverse events related to nervous system
digestive system
skeleton and connective tissue
and fractures was comparable between experimental group and other bisphosphonates group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of severe adverse events between the experimental group and the control group (RR=2.59
95% CI from 0.54 to 12.50
P=0.24). Conclusion: Zoledronic acid demonstrates effective efficacy for bone metabolic disorders in children. The overall incidences of adverse events and severe adverse events are comparable between zoledronic acid and placebo and other bisphosphonates
especially in terms of adverse events related to the nervous system
digestive system
and skeletonl and connective tissue. [Keywords] zoledronic acid; children; bone metabolic disorders; safety; efficacy; systematic review