Tian Liang, Gong Deshan. Comparison of Four Sedatives in Epileptic Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination. [J]. 27(2):31-34(2021)
DOI:
Tian Liang, Gong Deshan. Comparison of Four Sedatives in Epileptic Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination. [J]. 27(2):31-34(2021) DOI: 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2021.02.010.
Comparison of Four Sedatives in Epileptic Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of four sedatives for epileptic children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examination. Methods: Totally 320 epileptic children (from 3 to 12 years old) admitted into our hospital from Mar. 2015 to Mar. 2018 were extracted. According to the sequential time of MRI examination
all patients were enrolled and given four sedative drug regimens (chloral hydrate
dexmedetomidine
diazepam and midazolam) to evaluate the MRI imaging quality
sedation process and physiological indexes. Results: Among the four groups
the quality of MRI examination (72 cases) and inadequate sedation (16 cases) in the dexmedetomidine group were significantly better than those in the chloral hydrate group (28 cases
60 cases)
diazepam group (40 cases
44 cases) and midazolam group (52 cases
20 cases)
with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The onset time of dexmedetomidine group (17.5±3.9) min was shorter than that of chloral hydrate group (35.6±6.8) min
diazepam group (25.5±5.7) min and midazolam group (36.1±7.9)min (P<0.05). The average arterial pressure
heart rate and ventilator frequency of four groups during sedation were lower than those before sedation (P<0.05). Conclusion: Four sedatives can be used for MRI examination in children with epilepsy
yet dexmedetomidine has certain advantages in providing more adequate sedation and higher image quality
and has no effects on hemodynamics and respiration.