Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Efficacy of Probiotics in Prevention of Children with Urinary Tract Infection

Tian Chao; Shi Qiang; Wang Xiaoling

doi:10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2020.05.005

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Efficacy of Probiotics in Prevention of Children with Urinary Tract Infection

更新时间：2022-11-03

- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Efficacy of Probiotics in Prevention of Children with Urinary Tract Infection
- Vol. 26, Issue 5, Pages: 16-20(2020)
- 作者机构：
  
  国家儿童医学中心,首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院药学部,北京,100045
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2020.05.005
  CLC：
- Published：2020，
  
  Published Online：10 May 2020，
扫描看全文
Tian Chao, Shi Qiang, Wang Xiaoling. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Efficacy of Probiotics in Prevention of Children with Urinary Tract Infection. [J]. 26(5):16-20(2020)
DOI：

Tian Chao, Shi Qiang, Wang Xiaoling. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Efficacy of Probiotics in Prevention of Children with Urinary Tract Infection. [J]. 26(5):16-20(2020) DOI： 10.13407/j.cnki.jpp.1672-108X.2020.05.005.

摘要

目的：系统评价益生菌预防儿童泌尿系感染的有效性。方法：检索有关数据库，纳入益生菌预防患儿泌尿系感染的相关随机对照试验（RCT），检索时间为建库至2019年3月。按纳入标准与排除标准筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的方法学质量后，采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果：7项RCT纳入分析，包括1 879例患儿，治疗组938例，对照组941例。治疗组患者使用的药物包括乳酸杆菌、双歧杆菌、罗伊乳杆菌等，对照组患者使用的药物包括安慰剂和呋喃妥因等抗菌药物。Meta分析结果显示，治疗组与对照组预防儿童泌尿系感染的疗效上差异无统计学意义[OR=0.89

95%CI：0.52~1.54

P=0.69]。结论：根据目前相关研究，益生菌对预防泌尿系感染无显著优势。

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the efficacy of probiotics in prevention of children with urinary tract infection. Methods: Databases were retrieved to collect randomized controlled trial (RCT) related to probiotics in prevention of children with urinary tract infection. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to Mar. 2019. After screening the literature according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria

extracting the data and evaluating the methodological quality of the included literature

Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of seven RCT were collected

including 1

879 children

with 938 cases in the treatment group and 941 cases in the control group. The treatment group was given lactobacillus

bifidobacterium lactis and lactobacillus reuteri

while the control group received placebo and macrodantin. Meta-analysis results showed that there was no statistically significant difference between two groups in prevention of urinary tract infection [OR=0.89

95%CI: from 0.52 to 1.54

P=0.69]. Conclusion: According to current relevant research

probiotics have no significant advantage in prevention of urinary tract infection.

关键词

益生菌泌尿系感染儿童Meta分析随机对照试验

Keywords

probioticsurinary tract infectionchildrenMeta-analysisrandomized controlled trial

references

查看原文

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Meta-Analysis of Probiotics in the Treatment of Functional Abdominal Pain in Children

Meta-Analysis of Probiotics in Prevention and Treatment of Bronchial Asthma in Children

Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Milrinoneon Injection in the Treatment of Children with Congenital Heart Disease Complicated with Severe Pneumonia and Heart Failure

Meta-Analysis on Efficacy of Gamma Globulin Combined with Glucocorticoid and Glucocorticoid Alone in the Treatment of Children with Abdominal Henoch-Schönlein Purpura

Medication Analysis of a Child with Chronic Renal Failure Complicated with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection

Related Author

Li Huifang

Fu Jinjin

Wang Jun

Duan Yuhang

Tian Chao

Shi Qiang

Wang Xiaoling

Zhang Xiangyu

Related Institution

Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,, China

Department of Pediatrics, China-Japan Friendship Hospital

National Center for Children’s Health, Beijing Children’s Hospital Affiliated to the Capital Medical University

Hainan Women and Children’s Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Hainan

Kunming City Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Kunming

⁰