Clinical evaluation of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in multiple injury patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
返回论文页
|更新时间:2024-01-17
|
Clinical evaluation of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in multiple injury patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
Journal of Chongqing Medical UniversityVol. 35, Issue 12, Pages: 1884-1887(2010)
Gu Man-ping, et al. Clinical evaluation of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in multiple injury patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 35(12):1884-1887(2010)
Gu Man-ping, et al. Clinical evaluation of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in multiple injury patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 35(12):1884-1887(2010) DOI: 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.2010.12.039.
Clinical evaluation of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in multiple injury patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
Objective:To explore the importance of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation(NIPPV) in treating patients suffered from multiple injury accompanied with acute lung injury(ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)
and summarize the clinical usage of bi-level airway pressure ventilation mode in the treatment.Methods:The 75 cases with multiple injury complicated with ALI/ARDS were analyzed retrospectively and the following two groups were obtained:the positive pressure ventilation group
in abbreviation NIPPV
and the invasive mechanical ventilation group
in abbreviation IMV.The changes of arterial blood gas individually before and after 2 h treatment and the duration of using ventilation were compared between the two groups.Results:40 cases were enrolled into NIPPV group
and 35 cases belong to IMV group.The arterial partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2) and arterial oxygen saturation(SaO2) had significantly improved after 2 h NIPPV or IMV treatment(both P <0.000 1).5 patients changed to IMV after 3~5 days NIPPV(average=4.2 d)according to their conditions.4 patients who needed general anesthesia operations were given IMV for 20~36 h
then were changed to NIPPV.Duration of using NIPPV were 3~18 d(average=(8±5.5) d)
and duration of using IMV were 5~20 d(average=(9±5.5) d).The changes of arterial blood gas showed no significant difference between NIPPV and IMV at the statistic level of P>0.05.No patient died in two groups.Conclusion:The use of bi-level airway pressure ventilation on NIPPV mode in early stage of multiple injury patients with ALI/ARDS not only has same effect as using IMV
but also can reduce complications and improve patients’ comfortableness.