The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale

Jing Fu; Haiping Zhang; Qian Yu; Yiyin Xing; Jun Xiao

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002917

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale

Psychological assessment of cognitive impairment | 更新时间：2022-06-24

- The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale
- Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences Vol. 46, Issue 11, Pages: 1320-1323(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院康复医学科，成都　610072
  2.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院精神医学中心神经内科，成都　611130
  3.西南医科大学神经病学研究生，泸州　646000
  4.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院精神医学中心神经心理科，成都　611130
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002917
  CLC： R320.54
- Published：28 November 2021，
  
  Received：30 May 2021，
扫描看全文
Jing Fu, Haiping Zhang, Qian Yu, et al. The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale. [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 46(11):1320-1323(2021)
DOI：

Jing Fu, Haiping Zhang, Qian Yu, et al. The reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale. [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 46(11):1320-1323(2021) DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002917.

摘要

目的：

对自编简易临床失语量表进行信度和效度检验。

方法：

对符合标准的45例正常受试者和46例卒中后失语患者进行自编简易临床失语量表的2次评估：不同评定者间评估、汉语失语成套测验（Aphasia Battery of Chinese，ABC）量表评估。计算本量表的重测信度、内部一致性、评定者间信度及校标效度、结构效度、区分效度。

结果：

简易临床失语量表的重测信度为0.867~0.990；量表克龙巴赫α系数为0.873；评分者间信度为0.862~0.992；因子分析KMO为0.825；区分效度

0.001；校标效度为0.805~0.953。

结论：

简易临床失语量表对脑卒中后失语症患者的诊断具有较好的信度和效度，可作为卒中后失语症患者言语功能障碍的测评工具。

Abstract

Objective

To test the reliability and validity of the self-designed simple clinical aphasia scale.

Methods

A total of 45 normal subjects and 46 patients with aphasia after stroke were assessed twice with the self-designed clinical aphasia scale among different raters

and Aphasia Battery of Chinese (ABCJ) scale evaluation was conducted. The retest reliability

internal consistency

inter rater reliability

calibration validity

construction validity and discriminant validity were calculated.

Results

The retest reliability of the simple clinical aphasia scale was 0.867-0.990.The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.873.The reliability inter the raters was 0.862-0.992.Factor analysis KMO was 0.825

discriminant validity was

0.001

and calibration validity was 0.805-0.953.

Conclusion

The simple clinical aphasia scale has good reliability and validity in the diagnosis of Chinese aphasia after stroke

and can be used as a tool to evaluate the language impairment of patients with aphasia after stroke.

关键词

卒中后失语症简易临床失语量表信度效度

Keywords

aphasia after strokesimple clinical aphasia scalereliabilityvalidity

references

高素荣. 失语症[M]. 2版.北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2006.

Hamilton RH. Neuroplasticity in the language system: reorganization in post-stroke aphasia and in neuromodulation interventions[J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2016, 34(4):467-471.

Pustina D, Coslett HB, Ungar L, et al. Enhanced estimations of post-stroke aphasia severity using stacked multimodal predictions[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017, 38(11):5603-5615.

Turner-Stokes L, Hassan N. Depression after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway. Part 1: diagnosis, frequency and impact[J]. Clin Rehabil, 2002, 16(3):231-247.

杨涓, 熊晓雯. 《中国康复研究中心汉语标准失语症检查量表》在客家语失语症患者的应用研究[J]. 中国康复, 2014, 29(5):331-332.

中华神经内科学会, 中华神经外科学会. 各类脑血管疾病的诊断要点[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 1996, 29(6):379-381.

Yang HY, Tian SH, Flamand-Roze C, et al. Scatter diagram between Aphasia quotient(AQ)of the Western Aphasia Battery(WAB)and total scores of the Chinese version of the Language Screening Test(CLAST-a/CLAST-b)[EB/OL]. (2018-05-05)[2021-05-01]. https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Scatter_diagram_between_Aphasia_quotient_AQ_of_the_Western_Aphasia_Battery_WAB_and_total_scores_of_the_Chinese_version_of_the_Language_Screening_Test_CLAST-a_CLAST-b_/6223046https://figshare.com/articles/figure/Scatter_diagram_between_Aphasia_quotient_AQ_of_the_Western_Aphasia_Battery_WAB_and_total_scores_of_the_Chinese_version_of_the_Language_Screening_Test_CLAST-a_CLAST-b_/6223046.

梁俊杰, 陈卓铭, 陈玉美, 等. 基于认知神经心理学研究的失语症评定及治疗进展[J]. 广东医学, 2017, 38(19):3049-3051.

吴积宝. 非语言性认知功能评估量表的编制及标准化[D]. 广州: 南方医科大学, 2014.

Kadyamusuma MR. Standardization of the Shona-English bilingual aphasia assessment tests: a pilot study[EB/OL]. [2021-05-01]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320806042_Standardization_of_the_Shona-English_Bilingual_Aphasia_Assessment_Tests_A_pilot_Studyhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/320806042_Standardization_of_the_Shona-English_Bilingual_Aphasia_Assessment_Tests_A_pilot_Study.

关红丽, 丘卫红, 武惠香, 等. 中文版脑卒中后失语症生活质量量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2017, 39(2):97-101.

汉语失语症康复治疗专家共识组. 汉语失语症康复治疗专家共识[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2019, 41(3):161-169.

John AA, Javali M, Mahale R, et al. Clinical impression and Western Aphasia Battery classification of aphasia in acute ischemic stroke: is there a discrepancy?[J]. J Neurosci Rural Pract, 2017, 8(1):74-78.

包春茶, 张健. 浅谈汉语标准失语症检查量表的优缺点[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2017, 8(3):9-10.

Fromm D, Forbes M, Holland A, et al. Discourse characteristics in aphasia beyond the western aphasia battery cutoff[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2017, 26(3):762-768.

查看原文

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of social impact scale applied in study of stigma in colostomy patients

Reliability and validity of questionnaire of health education needs for patients with gynecological chemotherapy

Reliability and validity for Chinese version of pediatric quality of life inventoryTM （PedsQLTM） 3.0 neuromuscular module

Application of the Chinese version of brief illness perception questionnaire in patients with somatoform disorder

Construction of the continue nursing effectiveness evaluation index for patients with coronary heart disease after PCI

Related Author

Liu Yue

Wang Xihan

Mou Shaoyu

Shen Qingzhu

Shen Ｘin

Zhang Luping

Xie Liling

Zhao Qinghua

Related Institution

College of Nursing,Chongqing Medical University

Department of Gynecology

Department of Urology

Department of Nursing

Branch of Nursing Department，The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

⁰