Cambridge semantic memory test battery applied research among patients with semantic dementia

Miaoxin Shen; Ziling Han; Weilin Zhang; Jinsong Jiao; Xudong Li; Xiaopeng Tong

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002908

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Cambridge semantic memory test battery applied research among patients with semantic dementia

Psychological assessment of cognitive impairment | 更新时间：2022-06-24

- Cambridge semantic memory test battery applied research among patients with semantic dementia
- Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences Vol. 46, Issue 11, Pages: 1291-1295(2021)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院认知障碍科、国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心100070
  2.河北医科大学第二医院神经内科，石家庄　050004
  3.中日友好医院神经内科，北京　100029
  4.西藏民族大学研究生院基础医学部，咸阳　712082
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002908
  CLC： R741
- Published：28 November 2021，
  
  Received：06 July 2021，
扫描看全文
Miaoxin Shen, Ziling Han, Weilin Zhang, et al. Cambridge semantic memory test battery applied research among patients with semantic dementia. [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 46(11):1291-1295(2021)
DOI：

Miaoxin Shen, Ziling Han, Weilin Zhang, et al. Cambridge semantic memory test battery applied research among patients with semantic dementia. [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 46(11):1291-1295(2021) DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002908.

摘要

目的：

检测剑桥语义测验（Cambridge semantic memory test battery，CST）在语义性痴呆（semantic dementia，SD）患者中的研究应用。

方法：

对26例SD患者、25例正常对照组受试者均进行语言量表及其他包括简易精神状态检查量表（mini-mental state examination，MMSE）和蒙特利尔认知评估（Montreal cognitive assessment，MoCA）在内的全面的神经心理学测评。

结果：

①SD组整体测评结果均差于正常对照组（

0.001）；②CST的4个分项测验在检测SD患者与正常对照组时的AUC值分别为0.984（95%CI=0.951~1.000）、0.915（95%CI=0.826~1.000）、0.898（95%CI=0.808~0.988）、0.857（95%CI=0.733~0.980）（

0.001）。③采用双变量分析CST结果与MMSE、MoCA及综合性认知评估、日常生活能力量表（activity of daily living scale，ADL）、临床痴呆评定量表（clinical dementia rating scale，CDR）等结果在0.01层面具有显著相关性（

0.001）；④SD组患者核磁显示SD患者具有明显的颞叶前下部萎缩，且侧重于左侧，并与相关神经心理学量表测评结果相符。

结论：

CST可用于筛查SD患者。

Abstract

Objective

To detect the application of the Cambridge semantic memory test battery (CST) in patients with semantic dementia (SD).

Methods

In the study

26 SD patients and 25 normal control subjects were given language scales and other tests including mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA).

Results

①The overall evaluation results of the SD group were worse than those of the normal control group (

0.001). ②The AUC values of the 4 subtests of CST in the detection of SD patients and the normal control group were 0.984 (95%CI=0.951-1.000)

0.915 (95%CI=0.826-1.000)

0.898 (95%CI=0.808-0.988)

0.857 (95%CI=0.733-0.980) (

0.001). ③Bivariate analysis of CST results and MMSE

MoCA

comprehensive cognitive assessment

activity of daily living scale (ADL)

clinical dementia rating scale (CDR) and other results had significant correlation at the 0.01 level (

0.001). ④SD patients had significant atrophy of the anterior lower part of the temporal lobe

and focused on the left side

which was consistent with the evaluation results of the relevant neuropsychological scale.

Conclusion

CST can be used to screen SD patients.

关键词

剑桥语义测验语义性痴呆神经心理量表测评

Keywords

Cambridge semantic memory test batterysemantic dementianeuropsychologyscale measurement

references

Witoonpanich P, Crutch SJ, Warren JD, et al. The undiscovered syndrome: MacDonald Critchley's case of semantic dementia[J]. Neurocase, 2015, 21(4):408-412.

Hodges JR, Patterson K, Oxbury S, et al. Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy[J]. Brain, 1992, 115(Pt 6):1783-1806.

中国痴呆与认知障碍诊治指南写作组, 中国医师协会神经内科医师分会认知障碍疾病专业委员会. 2018中国痴呆与认知障碍诊治指南(十一)：非阿尔茨海默病痴呆的治疗[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2020, 100(17):1294-1298.

Bang J, Spina S, Miller BL. Frontotemporal dementia[J]. Lancet, 2015, 386(10004):1672-1682.

Rossor MN, Revesz T, Lantos PL, et al. Semantic dementia with ubiquitin-positive tau-negative inclusion bodies[J]. Brain, 2000, 123(Pt2):267-276.

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A prctical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[J]. J Psychiatr Res, 1975, 12(3):189-198.

中华医学会老年医学分会老年神经病学组额颞叶变性专家. 额颞叶变性专家共识[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2014, 47(5):351-356.

Lu JH, Li D, Li F, et al. Montreal cognitive assessment in detecting cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly individuals: a population-based study[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 2011, 24(4):184-190.

Hodges JR, Mitchell J, Dawson K, et al. Semantic dementia: demography, familial factors and survival in a consecutive series of 100 cases[J]. Brain, 2010, 133(Pt1):300-306.

周知, 钱端, 李旭东, 等. 语义性痴呆患者的临床、神经心理及影像学分析[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2016, 30(1):3-6, 12.

魏翠柏, 张玉婧, 周爱红, 等. 语义性痴呆的临床特点[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2018, 44(8):449-452.

Bocchetta M, Iglesias JE, Russell LL, et al. Segmentation of medial temporal subregions reveals early right-sided involvement in semantic variant PPA[J]. Alzheimers Res Ther, 2019, 11(1):41.

Chan D, Fox NC, Scahill RI, et al. Patterns of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease[J]. Ann Neurol, 2001, 49(4):433-442.

Brambati SM, Rankin KP, Narvid J, et al. Atrophy progression in semantic dementia with asymmetric temporal involvement: a tensorbased morphometry study[J]. Neurobiol Aging, 2009, 30(1):103-111.

Gorno-Tempini ML, Rankin KP, Woolley JD, et al. Cognitive and behavioral profile in a case of right anterior temporal lobe neurodegeneration[J]. Cortex, 2004, 40(4/5):631-644.

Sajjadi SA, Sheikh-Bahaei N, Cross J, et al. Can MRI visual assessment differentiate the variants of primary-progressive aphasia?[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017, 38(5):954-960.

Catani M, Mesulam MM, Jakobsen E, et al. A novel frontal pathway underlies verbal fluency in primary progressive aphasia[J]. Brain, 2013, 136(Pt8):2619-2628.

查看原文

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Quantitative electroencephalogram analysis in patients with semantic dementia

Heterogeneity of frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Recent progress in semantic dementia

Related Author

Xiangfei Zhang

Pei Rong

Chunlei Hou

Wenjing Zheng

Zhi Zhou

Xiaoxuan Li

Renbin Wang

Xudong Li

Related Institution

Department of Neurology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital

Department of Cognitive Disorder, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Captital Medical University/China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Disease

Department of Geriatric Neurology,Chinese PLA General Hospital

Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology,Huashan Hospital,Shanghai Medical College,Fudan University

⁰