On the effect of individualized pulmonary protective ventilation on general anesthesia pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery

Qianrong Wang; Lina Yu; Yan Zhou; Bowei Yao; Haojie Gong

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002836

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

On the effect of individualized pulmonary protective ventilation on general anesthesia pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery

Clinical research | 更新时间：2022-06-24

- On the effect of individualized pulmonary protective ventilation on general anesthesia pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery
- Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences Vol. 47, Issue 5, Pages: 572-576(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.浙江大学附属第二医院麻醉科，杭州　310009
  2.湖州市中心医院麻醉科，湖州　313000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002836
  CLC： R614.2
- Published：28 May 2022，
  
  Received：09 October 2020，
扫描看全文
Qianrong Wang, Lina Yu, Yan Zhou, et al. On the effect of individualized pulmonary protective ventilation on general anesthesia pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery. [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 47(5):572-576(2022)
DOI：

Qianrong Wang, Lina Yu, Yan Zhou, et al. On the effect of individualized pulmonary protective ventilation on general anesthesia pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery. [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 47(5):572-576(2022) DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.002836.

摘要

目的：

探讨个体化肺保护性通气对颅脑手术患者全身麻醉肺通气效果的影响。

方法：

选取湖州市中心医院2018年7月至2019年7月收治的54例择期行颅脑手术的患者，采用随机数字表法将其分为常规组与个体化组（

=27）：常规组给予传统容量控制机械通气，个体化组给予个体化呼气末正压通气（positive end expiratory pressure，PEEP）的肺保护性通气。检测并比较麻醉诱导前（T

）、切皮后（T

）、机械通气1 h（T

）、机械通气2 h（T

）、气管拔管后30 min（T

）血气分析、平均动脉压、肺动态顺应性，气道平台压术后1 d胸部CT，并记录患者术后7 d内肺部并发症的发生情况。

结果：

与常规组相比较，个体化组患者T

、T

时氧合指数以及肺动态顺应性均明显高于常规组，差异有统计学意义（

0.05）；同时T

、T

时气道平台压明显低于常规组，差异有统计学意义（

0.05）。

结论：

与常规通气比较，个体化肺保护性通气可以改善择期颅脑手术患者术中氧合指数、肺动态顺应性，同时降低机械通气时的气道平台压，并且安全有效。

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of individualized pulmonary protective ventilation on general anesthesia pulmonary ventilation in patients undergoing craniocerebral surgery.

Methods

Fifty-four patients admitted to Huzhou Central Hospital for craniocerebral surgery from July 2018 to July 2019 were selected as the study objects. They were divided into the conventional group (

=27) and the individualized group (

=27) randomly. The conventional group was given traditional volumetric control mechanical ventilation

and the individualized group was given individualized pulmonary protective ventilation by positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) . Blood gas analysis

mean arterial pressure

pulmonary dynamic compliance and airway platform pressure were detected and compared before anesthesia induction (T

)

after skin incision (T

)

mechanical ventilation for 1 h (T

)

for 2 h (T

)

and tracheal extubation for 30 min (T

)

and chest CT one day after surgery and the occurrence of pulmonary complications within seven days after surgery were recorded.

Results

Compared with the conventional group

the oxygenation index at T

and T

and the lung dynamic compliance in the individualized group were significantly higher (

0.05) . At the same time

the airway platform pressure at T

and T

was significantly lower than that in the conventional group (

0.05) .

Conclusion

Compared with conventional ventilation

individualized pulmonary protective ventilation can improve the intraoperative oxygenation index and dynamic compliance of lung

and reduce the airway platform pressure during mechanical ventilation

which is safe and effective.

关键词

最佳呼吸末正压肺顺应性氧合指数颅脑手术

Keywords

optimal positive end respiratory pressurelung complianceoxygenation indexcraniocerebral surgery

references

Güldner A, Kiss T, Serpa Neto A, et al. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 123(3): 692-713.

Flexman AM, Gooderham PA, Griesdale DE, et al. Effects of an alveolar recruitment maneuver on subdural pressure, brain swelling, and mean arterial pressure in patients undergoing supratentorial tumour resection: a randomized crossover study[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2017, 64(6): 626-633.

Ruszkai Z, Kiss E, László I, et al. Effects of intraoperative PEEP optimization on postoperative pulmonary complications and the inflammatory response: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2017, 18(1): 375.

Sogame LCM, Vidotto MC, Jardim JR, et al. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications in elective intracranial surgery[J]. J Neurosurg, 2008, 109(2): 222-227.

Chu H, Dang BW. Risk factors of postoperative pulmonary complications following elective craniotomy for patients with tumors of the brainstem or adjacent to the brainstem[J]. Oncol Lett, 2014, 8(4): 1477-1481.

Sabaté S, Mazo V, Canet J. Predicting postoperative pulmonary complications: implications for outcomes and costs[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2014, 27(2): 201-209.

Hess DR, Kondili D, Burns E, et al. A 5-year observational study of lung-protective ventilation in the operating room: a single-center experience[J]. J Crit Care, 2013, 28(4): 533.e9-533. 15.

Chen L, Zhao HL, Alam A, et al. Postoperative remote lung injury and its impact on surgical outcome[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2019, 19(1): 30.

Anaesthesiology PROVENIFTCTNOTESO, Hemmes SNT, de Abreu MG, et al. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery (PROVHILO trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2014, 384(9942): 495-503.

Jonson B, Richard JC, Straus C, et al. Pressure-volume curves and compliance in acute lung injury: evidence of recruitment above the lower inflection point[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999, 159(4 Pt 1): 1172-1178.

Amato MBP, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2015, 372(8): 747-755.

Kangelaris KN, Calfee CS, May AK, et al. Is there still a role for the lung injury score in the era of the Berlin definition ARDS?[J]. Ann Intensive Care, 2014, 4(1): 4.

Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, et al. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy[J]. Anesthesiology, 2010, 113(6): 1310-1319.

张才军, 谢俊然, 肖旺频, 等. 个体化保护性肺通气策略对老年患者全身麻醉肺通气效果的影响[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2019, 36(8): 1475-1478.

Zhang CJ, Xie JR, Xiao WP, et al. Effect of individualized protective pulmonary ventilation strategy on pulmonary ventilation in elderly patients under general anesthesia[J]. Chin J Exp Surg, 2019, 36(8): 1475-1478.

查看原文

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

Wang Qianrong

Related Institution

No data

⁰