Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for three-level intervention of birth defects in China

Xie Fei; Zhong Yin; Zhong Zhaohui

doi:10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001330

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for three-level intervention of birth defects in China

更新时间：2024-01-17

- Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for three-level intervention of birth defects in China
- Journal of Chongqing Medical University Vol. 42, Issue 8, Pages: 986-989(2017)
- 作者机构：
  
  重庆医科大学公共卫生与管理学院医学与社会发展研究中心健康领域社会风险预测治理协同创新中心
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001330
  CLC： R174
- Published：2017，
扫描看全文
[1]谢霏,钟引,钟朝晖.中国出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系的构建[J].重庆医科大学学报,2017,42(08):986-989.

Xie Fei, Zhong Yin, Zhong Zhaohui. Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for three-level intervention of birth defects in China. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 42(8):986-989(2017)
[1]谢霏,钟引,钟朝晖.中国出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系的构建[J].重庆医科大学学报,2017,42(08):986-989. DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001330.

Xie Fei, Zhong Yin, Zhong Zhaohui. Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system for three-level intervention of birth defects in China. [J]. Journal of Chongqing Medical University 42(8):986-989(2017) DOI： 10.13406/j.cnki.cyxb.001330.

摘要

目的:制定出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系及确定各指标权重

为出生缺陷干预工作的开展及其干预效果评价提供科学依据。方法:采用文献研究法和德尔菲专家咨询法

通过两轮问卷咨询

建立出生缺陷三级干预综合评价指标体系

运用层次分析法确定各指标权重

最后进行一致性检验。结果:两轮专家积极系数分别为94.3%、90.9%

专家平均权威系数为0.86

最终构建了出生缺陷三级干预综合评价体系的基本框架

包括3个一级指标:项目组织管理

项目过程评价

项目干预评价

9个二级指标和31个三级指标

并确定了各指标的权重。结论:专家代表性好、权威性高

构建的指标体系具有科学性和合理性

可用于出生缺陷三级干预项目的综合评价。

Abstract

Objective:To construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for three-level intervention of birth defects

to determine weights of all indicators

and to provide a scientific evidence for carrying out evaluation of intervention of birth defects. Methods:The evaluation index system was established by means of literature research and Delphi method through two rounds of consultation. The weight of each index was determined by analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Finally

consistency coefficients were tested. Results:The positive coefficients of the two rounds were 94.3% and 90.9% respectively

and the average authority coefficient of the experts was0.86. A comprehensive evaluation index system which included 3 primary indicators(including project organization and management

project process evaluation

project intervention evaluation)

9 secondary indicators and 31 third-level indicators was built

and the weights of all indicators were determined. Conclusion:Experts have good representativeness and high authority. The evaluation system is scientific

reliable and can be used for the comprehensive evaluation of the project for three-levels intervention of birth defects.

关键词

出生缺陷德尔菲法层次分析法指标体系权重

Keywords

birth defectsDelphi methodanalytic hierarchy processindex systemweights

references

Views

185

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

Analysis on the exposure of risk factors before pregnancy for couples at child bearing age in

Incidence of birth defects in Sichuan Province from 2010 to 2018

Related Author

YANG Liu

LI Hong

HUANG Jing

YAO He

YANG Jigao

ZHANG Yi

JI Yuan

SUN Daguang

Related Institution

Birth Defects and Genetic Eugenic Research Institute，Chongqing Institute for Population and Family Planning

Department of Biostatistics，College of Public Health and Management，Chongqing Medical University

Department of Maternal and Child Health Management, Sichuan Provincial Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital/The Affiliated Women’s and Children’s Hospital of Chengdu Medical College

⁰